Recycling Potential in Endoscopy - a Multicentre Prospective Observational Study
NCT ID: NCT05921136
Last Updated: 2023-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-06-12
2023-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Usefulness of Different Types of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Investigations.
NCT04585516
Retrospective Review of Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy Procedures
NCT05012527
The EYE Study Enhancing the Diagnostic Yield of Standard Colonoscopy by Artificial Intelligence Aided Endoscopy
NCT05139186
Reuse of Polyp Traps, a Way to Approach Sustainability
NCT06838312
Computer-aided Detection During Screening Colonoscopy
NCT05734820
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In different endoscopic departments waste will be weighed. Those are two hospitals (university and non-university) and two outpatient endoscopy units, each for four weeks. The waste will be divided into residual waste, paper and plastic in order to record the possible recycling potential. In addition, it will be investigated how great the savings potential is by avoiding disposable products (gowns, endoscopes).
The present study addresses the following end points:
* Parts of waste per examination in g (residual waste, plastic, paper).
* Savings potential through reusable items (e.g. gowns)
* Comparison of disposable vs. reusable endoscopes
* Descriptive description of the amount of waste at the different locations
* Statistical comparison of the amount of waste in the different locations
* Statistical comparison of the amount of waste per examination
* Statistical comparison of the amount of waste between out-patient and in-patient
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Type of examination (interventional vs diagnostic)
* Known multi-resistant germs (yes vs no)
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Georg Dultz
Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MDZ Magendarmzentrum, Gastroenterologisch, internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis
Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany
Klinikum der J. W. Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
IPG Hanau, Praxis für Gastroenterologie
Hanau, Hesse, Germany
Klinikum Hanau, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Diabetologie und Infektiologie
Hanau, Hesse, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rodriguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H, Agrawal D, Arvanitakis M, Baddeley R, Bak E, Bhandari P, Bretthauer M, Burga P, Donnelly L, Eickhoff A, Hayee B, Kaminski MF, Karlovic K, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Pellise M, Pioche M, Siau K, Siersema PD, Stableforth W, Tham TC, Triantafyllou K, Tringali A, Veitch A, Voiosu AM, Webster GJ, Vienne A, Beilenhoff U, Bisschops R, Hassan C, Gralnek IM, Messmann H. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2022 Aug;54(8):797-826. doi: 10.1055/a-1859-3726. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
Namburar S, von Renteln D, Damianos J, Bradish L, Barrett J, Aguilera-Fish A, Cushman-Roisin B, Pohl H. Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Gut. 2022 Jul;71(7):1326-1331. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324729. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
Welsch L, Friedrich-Rust M, Tal A, Haider N, Kim S, Schneider M, Schmitt L, Wittersheim L, Schmitt S, Heide A, Heilani M, Zeuzem S, Eickhoff A, Michael FA. Cutting waste in endoscopy: a multicentre observational study in the German healthcare system. Gut. 2025 Jun 15:gutjnl-2024-333401. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333401. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Flomi
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.