Realistic Evaluation of a Job Retention Program After Breast Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05919498
Last Updated: 2023-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
215 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-01
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In France, 58,500 new cases of breast cancer are diagnosed each year, half of them in women of working age. The importance of job retention has been formalized in the objectives of the latest cancer plans, and in the 2018-2022 national health strategy. Initiatives are observed to promote this issue by employers: development of a charter by the National Cancer Institute and in the associative field aimed at promoting support practices in their professional environment for people with cancer. Despite the development of descriptive knowledge on prognostic factors for returning to work after cancer, the results of interventional studies are mixed. No intervention has been shown to be effective in facilitating return to work and reducing social disparities in employment after breast cancer. Interventions have been criticized for being too medicalized and lacking a sufficient theoretical basis to analyse causes (theory of the problem) and propose solutions (theory of action).
The "FASTRACS" intervention was developed with the Intervention Mapping protocol to facilitate the return to work after breast cancer, it defines a return-to-work path from the hospital to the company through care primaries. This intervention is anchored in primary care with an early transition consultation in general medicine in the month following the end of active treatments (chemotherapy or radiotherapy according to the care protocol). This positioning in primary care allows a bio-psycho-social assessment of the needs of women after cancer. This consultation was designed to establish a plan of care and return to work according to the temporality and individual needs of each woman. It will make it possible to determine the right time for the pre-recovery visit in order to anticipate the professional challenges of the recovery.
Return to work/maintenance in employment interventions are complex social interventions, implemented by social actors who act in an environment with which they interact. These interventions (or programs) present an increased risk of failure in their implementation and sustainability. Realistic evaluation comes from the trend of theory-based evaluation (theory-based or theory-driven evaluation). According to this approach, social interventions are based on theories, which can be tested through empirical observation to better understand how and why they produce their effects, and in what context. This approach overcomes the limits of the "black box" model. It is recommended to inform the public decision to interrupt, modify or intensify an intervention. It aims to answer the question: "what works, how, why, for whom, and under what circumstances?" ". It aims to describe the mechanisms of the effectiveness of an intervention by linking its effects to the characteristics of its implementation context (search for CME configurations = context - mechanisms - effects). The search for these configurations, otherwise called "half-regularities" because they can be observed empirically with certain variations, is intended to develop a middle-range theory with a sufficient level of generalization and abstraction. to explain the tendencies and the regularities observed in the interactions contexts-mechanisms-effects of the intervention. This approach is particularly indicated in the evaluation of the FASTRACS intervention, given the complexity of the intervention, the number of actors involved, and the variety of its implementation contexts.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Professional Life After Breast Cancer: Feasibility of a Coaching Program for an Adapted Return to Work
NCT05056350
Psychosocial Support to Facilitate the Return to Employment of Women With Breast Cancer
NCT01780064
The Unmet Needs and the Workplace Reintegration of Breast Cancer Patients: the NEW-BreCa Project
NCT05309252
Study to Assess the Impact of Personalized Coaching on the Time Period and Quality of Return to Work After Breast Cancer
NCT04469205
Return to Work and Living Healthy After Head and Neck Cancer
NCT03065634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients in the FASTRACS-RCT intervention arm
The individuals in this group are patients in the intervention arm of the FASTRACS-RCT study.
Once their follow-up for the FASTRACS-RCT study is completed, they will be contacted to participate in the RECOVA-FASTRACS survey. They will be asked to conduct an individual semi-directive interview.
Patients may agree to provide contact information for people who have accompanied them on their return-to-work journey.
Individual semi-directive interview
This intervention concerns the trajectories of patients who have completed their participation in FASTRACS-RCT. Participant are : patients in the FASTRACS-RCT intervention arm (Groupe 1) and Trajectory persons (groupe 2).
During the individual interviews, the investigator and the participant will discuss the use of the FASTRACS-RCT tools and the patient's course of care.
The individual interviews will take place at the location chosen by the participant and will last on average one hour.
Trajectory persons
Trajectory persons are defined by FASTRACS-RCT patients. These persons have accompanied patients on their return-to-work journey. They may be someone close to you (family, friends, etc.), the general practitioner, a person from the company (colleagues, manager, occupational physician), or other health professionals (nurse, psychologist, etc.).
As a first step, all trajectory persons will complete an individual semi-directive interview. Then, some will be offered to participate in focus groups
Individual semi-directive interview
This intervention concerns the trajectories of patients who have completed their participation in FASTRACS-RCT. Participant are : patients in the FASTRACS-RCT intervention arm (Groupe 1) and Trajectory persons (groupe 2).
During the individual interviews, the investigator and the participant will discuss the use of the FASTRACS-RCT tools and the patient's course of care.
The individual interviews will take place at the location chosen by the participant and will last on average one hour.
Focus groups
This second intervention will take place at the end of the last patient followed by the FASTRACS-RCT.
During the focus groups, participants will discuss the use of the FASTRACS-RCT tools.
The focus groups will take place in a meeting room made available for the occasion and will last on average two hours.
Professionals/Focus group
This group is composed of some of the trajectory persons and professionals who participated in the delivery of the FASTRACS-RCT study intervention tools.
These individuals will participate in the focus groups.
Focus groups
This second intervention will take place at the end of the last patient followed by the FASTRACS-RCT.
During the focus groups, participants will discuss the use of the FASTRACS-RCT tools.
The focus groups will take place in a meeting room made available for the occasion and will last on average two hours.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Individual semi-directive interview
This intervention concerns the trajectories of patients who have completed their participation in FASTRACS-RCT. Participant are : patients in the FASTRACS-RCT intervention arm (Groupe 1) and Trajectory persons (groupe 2).
During the individual interviews, the investigator and the participant will discuss the use of the FASTRACS-RCT tools and the patient's course of care.
The individual interviews will take place at the location chosen by the participant and will last on average one hour.
Focus groups
This second intervention will take place at the end of the last patient followed by the FASTRACS-RCT.
During the focus groups, participants will discuss the use of the FASTRACS-RCT tools.
The focus groups will take place in a meeting room made available for the occasion and will last on average two hours.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Woman aged between 18 and 55.
* With a diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma of stage cTNM or pTNM stage I to III (UICC 8th edition), confirmed on histological examination.
* Treated by intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy in an adjuvant or neoadjuvant situation.
* Breast surgery +/- of the axillary area, carried out within 3 months preceding the start of adjuvant chemotherapy, or scheduled after neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy.
* In salaried employment at the time of diagnosis (permanent or temporary contract, interim assignment, civil servant).
* Affiliated to a French social security scheme.
* Reading, understanding, and writing the French language.
* Followed in one of the investigating centers.
* Not opposing the collection data.
* Persons declared by the patients for the study of the trajectories and only if their agreement is obtained for each person concerned (general practitioner, occupational physician, personnel of the resource center fort occupational and environmental pathologies (CRPPE), colleagues and hierarchy in the company and any key person identified by the patient who participated in the recovery process using the intervention tools).(groupe 2)
* Participants in discussion groups independent of trajectories (oncologists, clinical research associates, general practitioners, occupational health teams and CRPPE staff). (Groupe 3)
* For all categories of participants, it is necessary to be of legal age, to be able to read, understand and speak French.
Exclusion Criteria
* Distant metastases.
* History or co-existence of another primary cancer (apart from a basal cell cancer of the skin and/or non-mammary cancer in complete remission for more than 5 years).
* Recurrence or second breast cancer.
* Without employment contract, self-employed or supported contract.
* Cannot be followed for the duration of the study, for medical, social, family, geographical or psychological reasons.
* Deprived of liberty by court or administrative decision.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pôle de Santé Publique des Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22-5143
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.