Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Hookah Café Customers in the Atlanta Area (NCT NCT05916170)
NCT ID: NCT05916170
Last Updated: 2025-12-23
Results Overview
Change in eCO from baseline (before entry into the hookah café) to follow-up (upon exit from the hookah café) - eCO will be measured with the Bedfont Micro+ Smokerlyzer. Higher scores represent higher concentrations of Carbon Monoxide (CO), which is correlated with greater waterpipe use.
COMPLETED
NA
977 participants
Baseline and after exiting the café up to 10 hours
2025-12-23
Participant Flow
This is a cluster randomized crossover trial in which hookah cafes started in the No Warning Control condition and then crossed over to the Health Warnings Intervention, in which they were randomized to display one of four health warning messages (Milestones). Participants were cafe patrons on the days/nights that data collection was being conducted. Participants were only permitted to participate in one instance of data collection at one hookah cafe. Some cafes only had Control period.
Unit of analysis: Hookah Cafe
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Hookah Cafes in Atlanta, GA
Each hookah café will serve as its own control and will be used for data collection for both arms of the study. Cafes will start in the no-warning control arm and then will cross over to the intervention arm, where they will display one of four text-only warning signs. Participants will only participate in one of the arms.
|
|---|---|
|
No Warning Control
STARTED
|
507 27
|
|
No Warning Control
COMPLETED
|
479 27
|
|
No Warning Control
NOT COMPLETED
|
28 0
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
STARTED
|
470 23
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
Lung Damage Warning
|
148 6
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
Heart Damage Warning
|
104 5
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
CO Poison Warning
|
112 6
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
Fetal Damage Warning
|
106 6
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
COMPLETED
|
431 19
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
39 4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Hookah Cafes in Atlanta, GA
Each hookah café will serve as its own control and will be used for data collection for both arms of the study. Cafes will start in the no-warning control arm and then will cross over to the intervention arm, where they will display one of four text-only warning signs. Participants will only participate in one of the arms.
|
|---|---|
|
No Warning Control
Lost to Follow-up
|
12
|
|
No Warning Control
Withdrawal by Subject
|
15
|
|
No Warning Control
Noncompliance with protocol
|
1
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
Lost to Follow-up
|
15
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
|
10
|
|
Health Warning Intervention
Noncompliance with protocol
|
14
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Hookah Café Customers in the Atlanta Area
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
No Warning Control
n=507 Participants
No warnings posted in the hookah café
No Warnings: No warnings posted in the hookah café
|
Health Warning Intervention
n=470 Participants
Cafes will display text-only warning signs
Health Warnings: Text-only warnings about one health harm will be displayed in the hookah cafés where data collection is being conducted.
|
Total
n=977 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=68 Participants
|
31.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=4 Participants
|
31.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=219 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
295 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
289 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
584 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
203 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
177 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
380 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown
|
9 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
35 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
458 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
427 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
885 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
14 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
4 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
38 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
4 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
389 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
380 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
769 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
12 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
23 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
37 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=219 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
507 participants
n=68 Participants
|
470 participants
n=4 Participants
|
977 participants
n=219 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and after exiting the café up to 10 hoursPopulation: Participants were included in analysis if they completed both pre- and post-cafe eCO collection in cafes that completed both the control and intervention arms of this crossover trial. Participants in each arm are unique.
Change in eCO from baseline (before entry into the hookah café) to follow-up (upon exit from the hookah café) - eCO will be measured with the Bedfont Micro+ Smokerlyzer. Higher scores represent higher concentrations of Carbon Monoxide (CO), which is correlated with greater waterpipe use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
No Warning Control
n=356 Participants
No warnings posted in the hookah café
|
Health Warning Intervention
n=375 Participants
Each cafe displayed signs communicating one of four health warning messages. The primary outcome is reported as all of the health warnings aggregated versus the no warning control.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Expired Carbon Monoxide (eCO Boost)
|
25.7 parts per million
Standard Error 2.93
|
23.5 parts per million
Standard Error 2.91
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursParticipants will be asked at three items assessing their anticipated hookah smoking within the next month. Items will be averaged to create a composite score of intent to continue the behavior within the next month. 1. How interested are you in smoking tobacco in a hookah in the next month? 2. How likely are you to smoke tobacco in a hookah in the next month? 3. How much do you plan to smoke tobacco in a hookah in the next month? Response options: (1) Not at all, (2) Very little, (3) Somewhat, (4) Quite a bit, (5) Very much
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursOne item to measure participants' motivation to quit smoking hookah, rated on a 1-10 scale of Not at all motivated to Extremely motivated
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursParticipants will be asked a variety of items to assess their hookah smoking behaviors within the café. Items will be scored individually. 1. Did you smoke hookah in this café/lounge/bar today? (1) Yes, (2) No 2. (If no) Why didn't you smoke hookah in this café/lounge/bar today? Free text response 3. (If yes) Compared to a typical night, how much did you smoke? (1) Less hookah than usual, (2) About the same amount of hookah as usual, (3) More hookah than usual, (4) This was my first time smoking hookah 4. (If less) Why did you smoke less than usual? Free text response 5. (If more) Why did you smoke more than usual? Free text response
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursEight items from the Product Evaluation Scale (Hatsukami et al. 2013) will be used to assess participants' subjective experiences of smoking hookah. Items scores will be averaged across the subscale. 1. Was it satisfying? 2. Did it taste good? 3. Did you enjoy the sensations in your mouth? 4. Did you enjoy it? 5. Did it make you dizzy? 6. Did it make you nauseous? 7. Was it too much nicotine? 8. Were there bothersome side effects? Response options: (1) Not at all - (7) Extremely
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursFour items to assess participants' knowledge of health harms based on warning statements used across the study. We will calculate a sum score for each individual with higher scores indicating more accurate knowledge. Response options: True / False / I don't know
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursFour items to assess the participants' agreement with statements of how each of the four health harms utilized across the study apply to their own health. We will calculate a mean score across all four items for each individual, where higher scores indicate stronger beliefs about personal harm from hookah smoking. Response options: (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursOne Y/N item to assess participants' exposure to warnings. If participants report warning exposure, an open-ended item will assess warning recall.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursParticipants in the intervention arm will be asked to select the warning(s) that they saw at the café from four possible warnings. For each warning message that they report having seen, they will be asked to select where they saw the warning from a list of possible locations. (Intervention arm only)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursFor each warning selected in the Warning Recognition section, participants will be asked if they discussed the warning with others. If they answer positively, they will be given a list of topics to choose from to describe what they talked about, including a free-text option.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursParticipants will be asked whether they changed their smoking behavior as a result of the warning(s) they saw (as reported in the Warning Recognition section). They will be asked to report whether they smoked more, less, or the same amount as they usually do. These items will be asked for each warning the participant reports seeing.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: at exit; up to 10 hoursDuration of time in café will be calculated from the time of completion of eCO measurement at Time 1 to start of survey at Time 2. Additionally, we will utilize a subjective measure of time spent in the café: Compared to what you planned, how long did you stay at the café/lounge/bar? (Longer, shorter, about the same).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Control - No Warnings
Intervention - Health Warnings
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place