Evaluating Treatment Continuation in Telehealth Patients Receiving an Automated Patient-Reported Outcome Tool

NCT ID: NCT05895539

Last Updated: 2023-06-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-08

Study Completion Date

2020-11-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Engaging patients through integration of patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical care can improve the patient experience and provide a systematic way to collect adverse event (AE) data. Collecting these data on a large scale can inform new solutions to longstanding barriers to successful treatment such as medication non-adherence.

This study evaluated whether implementing a patient-reported outcome data collection and AE surveillance tool would result in greater treatment continuation for patients receiving care on a telehealth platform. We evaluated how this data collection and surveillance tool - a short prompt for patients to provide information on treatment satisfaction and side effects - impacted the outcome of interest, treatment continuation. We tested two cycles in n=2,000 patients receiving care for erectile dysfunction on a telehealth platform using a randomized control experimental design and accounted for incidents where true randomization was not possible during implementation. The first cycle tested the tool alone, while the second cycle tested the tool in conjunction with a messaging template system that provided standardized side effect counseling.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Internet-based Intervention Web-based Intervention Online Intervention Erectile Dysfunction Telemedicine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Did not receive the tool

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention

Did receive the tool

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

An automated patient-reported outcome data collection and adverse event surveillance tool

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients received a short prompt to provide information on treatment satisfaction and side effects

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

An automated patient-reported outcome data collection and adverse event surveillance tool

Patients received a short prompt to provide information on treatment satisfaction and side effects

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male patients living in the US, who were diagnosed with erectile dysfunction by a telehealth provider, and who were prescribed phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors as treatment

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ro

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lauren Broffman, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ro

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ro HQ

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zhou MS, Jain T, Hardy N, Perez-Segura A, Hickman J, Leopold L, Qualliotine K, Yedidi RS, Whetsell M, Broffman L. The design, implementation, and impact of an automated patient-reported outcome data collection and adverse event surveillance tool: a randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):1277. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10231-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37986191 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

21-12-196-599

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

E-health Implementation (Iowa)
NCT03954184 COMPLETED NA