Sngception and Pain in Spine Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways
NCT ID: NCT05885802
Last Updated: 2023-06-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-03-29
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pain management practice is traveling through a paradigm shift as opioid crises arise in the western countries. Opioid-based pain control is being disarmed and replaced by multimodal analgesia (MMA) and becoming the mainstay strategy. Opioids are increasingly being reserved as rescue medications. MMA target different parts of the nociceptive pathway, preventing its wind-up during surgery. Decreased firing of the nociceptive neurons may be linked to lower postoperative pain scores or even the suppressing chronic pain incidence. In our ERAS pathway, we implement erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as the main analgesic firepower.
As postoperative pain decreases, an observed rising complaint is "sng", or soreness, in native Taiwanese in our ERAS spine patients. It is very different from the nociceptive "pain" we are familiar with. Patients avoid movements if it causes pain, but they tend to stretch or adjust postures if sngception dominates. The term "sngception" has been proposed in 2018 by Taiwanese scholars. It is believed to be a sense of acidosis, possibly within the muscles. Acidosis and associated pain are well documented, such as in muscle aches from exercise, cancer or diabetic ketoacidosis. The underlying mechanism is yet to be established but does not entirely overlap with nociception. There are numerous similarities of sngception in our patients and sngception:
1. a sensation different from nociception,
2. usual painkillers are ineffective, suggesting an alternative route of transmission,
3. relieved by movement,
4. inflammation and acidosis in the vicinity of surgical wound. In this study, we intended to characterize sngception by observing various perioperative factors, as well as the short- and long- term outcomes they bring. This will be done through a detailed sngception and pain trajectory analysis. Only when we know the main causative factor(s), we can design treatment plans toward guarding against sngception. This further improves the quality of postoperative recovery and safety as less opioids may be required as rescue medications.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05830331
Complex Spine Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
NCT04538092
Enhanced Recovery After Spinal Surgery Protocol Versus Conventional Care in Non Insulin Diabetic Patients ( ERAS )
NCT05033899
Evaluation of Spine Surgery Analgesic Pathway
NCT02887404
Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery
NCT02949518
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ERAS group
Routine spine surgical patients receiving ERAS protocol that complies with current guidelines.
No specific intervention other than routine anesthesia protocol
No specific intervention other than routine anesthesia protocol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No specific intervention other than routine anesthesia protocol
No specific intervention other than routine anesthesia protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I\~III
Exclusion Criteria
2. Active alcohol or drug addiction.
3. Pregnancy
4. Allergy to main anesthetics that preclude the use of routine ERAS anesthesia management.
5. Patient refusal to participate in study.
6. Emergent operations.
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei City, Taipei, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lin JH, Hung CH, Han DS, Chen ST, Lee CH, Sun WZ, Chen CC. Sensing acidosis: nociception or sngception? J Biomed Sci. 2018 Nov 29;25(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12929-018-0486-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB 2022-09-009BC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.