Endometrial Vitamin D Receptor in PCOS

NCT ID: NCT05885633

Last Updated: 2023-06-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-21

Study Completion Date

2023-04-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is widely expressed not only in tissues responsible for calcium hemostasis, but also in reproductive organs, including the endometrium. The VDR, which is low in the proliferative phase, starts to increase in the early secretory phase and decreases again in the mid-secretory phase. Enzymes responsible for vitamin d (VD) production and metabolism are expressed locally in the endometrium. Binding of active VD to VDR in nuclear or plasma membrane increases receptivity gene expression and immunomodulators by activating genomic and nongenomic pathways. VDR expression defect has been reported in the decidual cells of recurrent miscarriages. There are no studies investigating the endometrial VDR expression pattern in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and its phenotypes. The VDR expression pattern in the endometrium of PCOS patients who underwent invitro fertilization /intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) and total embryo freezing was analyzed at both mRNA and immunohistochemical. The study group consisted of 44 PCOS patients who were referred to IVF/ICSI because they did not respond to first-line treatment with letrozole or clomiphene citrate (CC). Twenty patients who were scheduled for IVF/ICSI due to male factor infertility and who were matched with the study group in terms of age and body mass index (BMI) were included as the control group. Following egg collection, endometrial tissue was collected by pipelle cannula while the patient was under anesthesia. All good quality blastocysts of both groups were vitrified. The mRNA expression of vitamin D receptor transcript 2 (VDR-X2) and vitamin D receptor transcript 4 (VDR-X4) were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The quantitative cycle equation method was used to calculate the differences between VDR-mRNA expressions. Endometrial VDR and progesterone receptor (PR) immunoreactivity were determined by immunohistochemistry.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study question: How does the expression of endometrial vitamin D receptor vary according to phenotypes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)?

What is known already: VDR is widely expressed not only in tissues responsible for calcium hemostasis, but also in reproductive organs, including the endometrium. The VDR, which is low in the proliferative phase, starts to increase in the early secretory phase and decreases again in the mid-secretory phase. Enzymes responsible for VD production and metabolism are expressed locally in the endometrium. Binding of active VD to VDR in nuclear or plasma membrane increases receptivity gene expression and immunmodulators by activating genomic and nongenomic pathways. VDR expression defect has been reported in the decidual cells of recurrent miscarriage cases. There are no studies investigating the endometrial VDR expression pattern in PCOS and its phenotypes.

Study design, size, duration: The study group consisted of 44 PCOS patients who were referred to IVF/ICSI because they did not respond to first-line treatment with letrozole or clomiphene citrate (CC). Twenty patients who were scheduled for IVF/ICSI due to male factor infertility and who were matched with the study group in terms of age and BMI were included as the control group. Those who met at least two of the criteria for hyperandrogenemia (HA), ovulatory dysfunction (OD) and polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) determined by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/ American Society for Reproductive Medicine were considered PCOS. Following egg collection, endometrial tissue was collected by pipelle cannula while the patient was under anesthesia. All good quality blastocysts of both groups were vitrified.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: The 44 participants in the PCOS group were divided into four phenotypic groups as follows according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus panel. Phenotype A: HA+OD+PCOM (classical/complete, n=17); phenotype B: HA+OD (classical/non-PCOM, n=10); phenotype C: HA+PCOM (ovulatory, n=9); and phenotype D: OD+PCOM (non-hyperandrogenic, n=8). The mRNA expression of vitamin D receptor transcript 2 (VDR-X2) and vitamin D receptor transcript 4 (VDR-X4) were determined by qPCR. The quantitative cycle equation method was used to calculate the differences between VDR-mRNA expressions. Endometrial VDR and progesterone receptor (PR) immunoreactivity were determined by immunohistochemistry. The histological score formula was used for the quantitative evaluation of VDR and PR immunoreactivity.

Limitations, reasons for caution: The lack of an equal number of participants for each phenotype is our first limitation. Due to the collection of endometrial samples in the IVF/ICSI cycle, the possible effect of ovarian stimulation drugs and the associated increased estrogen levels on the endometrium has not been excluded. Changes in endometrial VDR-mRNA expression could not be confirmed by protein measurement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Vitamin D Receptor Defect

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

While the study group consisted of PCOS patients, the control group was selected from non-PCOS patients with male factor infertility.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PCOS

Infertile PCOS patients (n=44)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endometrial sampling with pipelle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Following oocyte retrieval while the patient was under anesthesia, endometrial tissue sampling was performed with the help of pipelle cannula. A portion of the endometrial tissue was put into RNA stabilization buffer (RNAlater) to be used in qPCR and stored at -20°C until the analysis. The remaining endometrial tissue was first fixed with 10% formalin, followed by paraffin blocking and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis.

Non-PCOS control

Non-PCOS control with male factor infertility

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endometrial sampling with pipelle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Following oocyte retrieval while the patient was under anesthesia, endometrial tissue sampling was performed with the help of pipelle cannula. A portion of the endometrial tissue was put into RNA stabilization buffer (RNAlater) to be used in qPCR and stored at -20°C until the analysis. The remaining endometrial tissue was first fixed with 10% formalin, followed by paraffin blocking and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis.

Phenotype A

Phenotype A: HA+OD+PCOM (classical/complete, n=17)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endometrial sampling with pipelle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Following oocyte retrieval while the patient was under anesthesia, endometrial tissue sampling was performed with the help of pipelle cannula. A portion of the endometrial tissue was put into RNA stabilization buffer (RNAlater) to be used in qPCR and stored at -20°C until the analysis. The remaining endometrial tissue was first fixed with 10% formalin, followed by paraffin blocking and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis.

Phenotype B

phenotype B: HA+OD (classical/non-PCOM, n=10)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endometrial sampling with pipelle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Following oocyte retrieval while the patient was under anesthesia, endometrial tissue sampling was performed with the help of pipelle cannula. A portion of the endometrial tissue was put into RNA stabilization buffer (RNAlater) to be used in qPCR and stored at -20°C until the analysis. The remaining endometrial tissue was first fixed with 10% formalin, followed by paraffin blocking and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis.

Phenotype C

phenotype C: HA+PCOM (ovulatory, n=9)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endometrial sampling with pipelle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Following oocyte retrieval while the patient was under anesthesia, endometrial tissue sampling was performed with the help of pipelle cannula. A portion of the endometrial tissue was put into RNA stabilization buffer (RNAlater) to be used in qPCR and stored at -20°C until the analysis. The remaining endometrial tissue was first fixed with 10% formalin, followed by paraffin blocking and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis.

Phenotype D

phenotype D: OD+PCOM (non-hyperandrogenic, n=8).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endometrial sampling with pipelle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Following oocyte retrieval while the patient was under anesthesia, endometrial tissue sampling was performed with the help of pipelle cannula. A portion of the endometrial tissue was put into RNA stabilization buffer (RNAlater) to be used in qPCR and stored at -20°C until the analysis. The remaining endometrial tissue was first fixed with 10% formalin, followed by paraffin blocking and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

endometrial sampling with pipelle

Following oocyte retrieval while the patient was under anesthesia, endometrial tissue sampling was performed with the help of pipelle cannula. A portion of the endometrial tissue was put into RNA stabilization buffer (RNAlater) to be used in qPCR and stored at -20°C until the analysis. The remaining endometrial tissue was first fixed with 10% formalin, followed by paraffin blocking and prepared for immunohistochemical analysis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of PCOS
* Approval for IVF/ICSI and total embryo freezing
* Consent to endometrial sampling

Exclusion Criteria

* Women with hyperandrogenism or ovulatory dysfunction due to non-PCOS etiologies.
* Patients taking vitamin D, insulin sensitizers, lipid-lowering or other hormonal drugs in the last three months were not included.
* Those with a history of mechanical endometrial injury, polypectomy, hysteroscopic myomectomy, endometrioma resection, dilatation/curettage, ovarian drilling and salpingectomy were also excluded.
* Participants with premalignant or malignant endometrial pathology, those with a history of tubal factor infertility, congenital uterine anomaly or any chronic systemic diseases were not included.
* Azoospermia patients were excluded from the study because we preferred ejaculate sperm for ICSI in patients in the control group.
Minimum Eligible Age

26 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

32 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bahçeşehir University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Firat University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Uşak University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

nur DE gungor, assoc. prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

BAU IVF-Center

aynur A ersahin, assoc. prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

BAU IVF-Center

arzu yurci, assoc. prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Memorial IVF-Center

Ulun ulug, prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Halic University

meltem yardım, specialist

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yerkoy State Hospital

nilufer celik, assoc. prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital

ahmet tektemur, assoc. prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Firat University

Tuncay Kuloglu, Assoc. prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Firat University

Kagan Gungor, Assoc. prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medeniyet University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Usak University Training and Research Hospital

Uşak, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carmina E, Longo RA. Increased Prevalence of Elevated DHEAS in PCOS Women with Non-Classic (B or C) Phenotypes: A Retrospective Analysis in Patients Aged 20 to 29 Years. Cells. 2022 Oct 17;11(20):3255. doi: 10.3390/cells11203255.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36291122 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UsakUn

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oral Administration of DCI to Women With PCOS
NCT00497653 TERMINATED PHASE2/PHASE3