Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Heart Failure

NCT ID: NCT05881720

Last Updated: 2023-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study was to identify potential prognostic factors of sacubitril/valsartan vs Valsartan treatment response.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study will include 80 symptomatic patients with chronic HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II/III: Group 1 (N = 40) received sacubitril/valsartan (target dose, 100 mg twice daily) or group 2 received valsartan (target dose, 80 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment. Analysis of biochemical parameters, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and echocardiographic evaluation was performed at baseline and 6 months later. The primary outcome was the change in LVEF%, Lipo A, troponin I, NT-Pro BNP and neopterin levels. The secondary outcome is reporting efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs Valsartan use and the relationship between NYHA and EF and biomarkers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Group 1 (N = 40) received sacubitril/valsartan (target dose, 100 mg twice daily) or group 2 received valsartan (target dose, 80 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
Double Blind randomized controlled trial

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 (N = 40)

Group 1 (N = 40) received sacubitril/valsartan (target dose, 100 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sacubitril / Valsartan Oral Tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 1 (N = 40) received sacubitril/valsartan (target dose, 100 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.

Group 2 (N = 40)

group 2 received valsartan (target dose, 80 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Valsartan 80 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

group 2 received valsartan (N=40, target dose, 80 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sacubitril / Valsartan Oral Tablet

Group 1 (N = 40) received sacubitril/valsartan (target dose, 100 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.

Intervention Type DRUG

Valsartan 80 mg

group 2 received valsartan (N=40, target dose, 80 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy according to physician's judgment.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

sacubitril / valsartan (100 mg twice daily) Valsartan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with HF were enrolled if aged \> 35 years,
* Stable symptomatic systolic chronic HF (≥ 4 weeks), with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 35%,
* NYHA class II-III,
* Sinus rhythm and resting HR ≥ 70 beats/min on optimised standard medical therapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with acute decompensation,
* Cerebrovascular events during the previous 6 months,
* Pregnancy, breastfeeding,
* Any valve dysfunction/abnormality,
* Active myocarditis,
* Second-degree and third-degree atrioventricular block,
* Sick sinus syndrome.
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Damanhour University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rehab Werida

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rehab H Werida, Ass.Prof.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Damanhour University

Ahmed El-Sherbeni

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Tanta University

Lamiaa Khedr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tanta University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tanta University Hospital

Tanta, Elgarbia, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dogheim GM, Khairat I, Omran GA, El-Haggar SM, Amrawy AME, Werida RH. Clinical comparative study assessing the effect of ivabradine on neopterin and NT-Pro BNP against standard treatment in chronic heart failure patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;78(6):943-954. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03290-6. Epub 2022 Mar 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35238960 (View on PubMed)

McMurray JJV, Jackson AM, Lam CSP, Redfield MM, Anand IS, Ge J, Lefkowitz MP, Maggioni AP, Martinez F, Packer M, Pfeffer MA, Pieske B, Rizkala AR, Sabarwal SV, Shah AM, Shah SJ, Shi VC, van Veldhuisen DJ, Zannad F, Zile MR, Cikes M, Goncalvesova E, Katova T, Kosztin A, Lelonek M, Sweitzer N, Vardeny O, Claggett B, Jhund PS, Solomon SD. Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Women Compared With Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARAGON-HF. Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):338-351. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044491. Epub 2019 Nov 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31736337 (View on PubMed)

Biering-Sorensen T, Lassen MCH, Shah A, Claggett B, Zile M, Pieske B, Pieske-Kraigher E, Voors A, Shi V, Lefkowitz M, Packer M, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD; PARAMOUNT Investigators. The Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Left Ventricular Myocardial Deformation in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAMOUNT trial). J Card Fail. 2023 Jun;29(6):968-973. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.03.019. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37031887 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

sacubitril/valsartan in HF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.