Histopathologic and Lymphocyte Subpopulations Evaluation of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract of Crohn's Disease

NCT ID: NCT05874349

Last Updated: 2023-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-01

Study Completion Date

2023-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) comprises a series of disorders of unknown cause, such as ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD) and indeterminate colitis (IC), associated with an over-the-top immune response that produces lesions of variable depth and extent in the intestine. They have a chronic course, without cure and with an unpredictable evolution. Clinical symptoms of CD are characterized by malaise, weight loss, fever, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, vomiting, sometimes palpable mass, perianal disease, among others. The disease is most frequently located in the ileocecal area, but all the entire digestive tract from the oral cavity to the rectum may be affected. The involvement of the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGT) (L4) in CD is frequently undiagnosed. From 1-7% of patients with CD refer symptoms or signs that are due to UG involvement. Chronic iron deficient anaemia, in the absence of digestive symptoms, is the only guiding sign that may alert about the diagnosis.

Furthermore, retrospective cohort studies suggest that CD of the UGT is associated with a worse prognosis. The systematic study of the UGT in the initial evaluation of CD at the time of diagnosis is not generally recommended in adulthood, European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) guidelines recommend upper endoscopy only if there are upper digestive symptoms (vomiting, dyspepsia, etc.). In the case of gastroscopy, gastric biopsies have to be performed due to the possible presence of focal active gastritis, which is considered very specific of CD. This statement is based on a limited series of cases published in 1980. On the other hand, systematic performance of duodenal biopsies is not recommended. This fact has caused that the histopathology of duodenal CD is very unknown and the need to perform duodenal biopsies of the UGT is still a matter of debate.

Macro and microscopic findings from the UGT have generally been used to differentiate between UC and CD in cases of IC. Among the macroscopic findings highlight the presence of sores or ulcers and most specific and frequent microscopic findings are granulomas and chronic inflammatory infiltrate respectively. However, it is known that CD can cause lymphocytic infiltration of the duodenal epithelium (duodenal lymphocytosis or lymphocytic enteritis) and villus atrophy. These are findings are characteristically found in celiac disease, and therefore, these histological lesions of the duodenum also propose the differential diagnosis between celiac disease and CD.

In addition, it must be considered that many of the patients with IBD take immunosuppressive for disease control, which have been reported to be the cause of lymphocytic enteritis and duodenal villus atrophy. This proposed drug-induced enteropathy is based only in a few series of cases in the context of treatment with azathioprine and methotrexate. There are no studies systematically evaluate how often these drugs can cause a "sprue like" enteropathy.

The lymphocytic enteritis of celiac disease has been associated with a specific pattern of lymphocyte subpopulations (increase in the percentage of CD3+TCRγẟ+ lymphocytes and decrease in the percentage of CD3-). It is unknown if CD duodenal lymphocytes is associated with a specific CD cytometric pattern. If so, the evaluation of lymphocyte subpopulations could be of great diagnostic aid when considering the differential diagnosis between celiac disease, CD and other forms of duodenal lymphocytosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hypothesis:

Routine evaluation of the upper digestive tract mucosa can be useful for the differential diagnosis between of adult CD and celiac disease, particularly in patients with chronic iron-deficient anemia and lymphocytic enteritis in the duodenum. The study of the lymphocytic subpopulations can help in the differential diagnosis of lymphocytic enteritis and identify in which cases are due to CD. Nowadays, the prevalence of "sprue-like" enteropathy associated with the use of immunosuppressants in CD is unknown.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Crohn Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort 1: Crohn's disease

Patients with CD diagnosed according to the criteria of the ECCO guidelines. For the histological and lymphocyte subpopulation analysis of duodenal samples, all patients with CD who required an endoscopic examination during the disease have been prospectively included. All the recorded variables were registered at the moment of the endoscopy.

General variables

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Variables evaluated: age, sex, location, extent, and phenotype of IBD according to the Montreal classification, smoking habit, therapeutic requirements (immunosuppressants, biologics, steroids, salicylates, drugs that cause enteropathy such as olmesartan, valsartan, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, etc, ...).

Clinical activity

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Clinical activity was evaluated using the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) (cut-off values: \<5, remission; 5-7, mild activity; 8-16, moderate activity; and \>16, severe activity).

Laboratory data

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laboratory data: blood count, renal function and C-reactive protein, anti-transglutaminase antibodies, genetic study of celiac disease DQ2.5, DQ8, and DQ2.2, study of parasites, fecal calprotectin.

Endoscopic and histology data

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic signs suggestive of CD in UDT (presence of canker sores, ulcers, ...) and colon inflammatory activity was evaluated when available in patients with active disease using the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD: 0-2, remission; 3-6, mild endoscopic activity; 7-15, moderate endoscopic activity; and \>15, severe endoscopic activity).

Duodenal biopsies were assessed by 2 pathologists and were evaluated according to Marsh classification modified by Ensari \[Marsh 0, 1, 2 or 3\], the limit of normality for intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) per 100 enterocytes is set at 25, gastric biopsies (determination of H. Pylori by immunohistochemistry) and esophageal biopsies was recorded too.

Percentage of lymphocyte subpopulations are assessed by flow cytometry.

Cohort 2: Control groups

Two groups are included: 1) Disease control: Patients with celiac disease diagnosed according to the Catassi and Fasano criteria and 2) Healthy control subjects. For the histological and lymphocyte subpopulation analysis of duodenal samples, patients with celiac disease were prospectively included to undergone gastroscopy, before starting gluten-free diet. Control subjects were patients referred for upper endoscopy due to digestive symptoms that have normal appearing mucosa both at endoscopic and histological assessment (Marsh 0, \<25 intraepithelial lymphocytes). Serological markers of celiac disease were negative and they have no signs of inflammatory bowel diseases.

General variables

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Variables evaluated: age, sex, location, extent, and phenotype of IBD according to the Montreal classification, smoking habit, therapeutic requirements (immunosuppressants, biologics, steroids, salicylates, drugs that cause enteropathy such as olmesartan, valsartan, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, etc, ...).

Clinical activity

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Clinical activity was evaluated using the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) (cut-off values: \<5, remission; 5-7, mild activity; 8-16, moderate activity; and \>16, severe activity).

Laboratory data

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laboratory data: blood count, renal function and C-reactive protein, anti-transglutaminase antibodies, genetic study of celiac disease DQ2.5, DQ8, and DQ2.2, study of parasites, fecal calprotectin.

Endoscopic and histology data

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic signs suggestive of CD in UDT (presence of canker sores, ulcers, ...) and colon inflammatory activity was evaluated when available in patients with active disease using the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD: 0-2, remission; 3-6, mild endoscopic activity; 7-15, moderate endoscopic activity; and \>15, severe endoscopic activity).

Duodenal biopsies were assessed by 2 pathologists and were evaluated according to Marsh classification modified by Ensari \[Marsh 0, 1, 2 or 3\], the limit of normality for intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) per 100 enterocytes is set at 25, gastric biopsies (determination of H. Pylori by immunohistochemistry) and esophageal biopsies was recorded too.

Percentage of lymphocyte subpopulations are assessed by flow cytometry.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

General variables

Variables evaluated: age, sex, location, extent, and phenotype of IBD according to the Montreal classification, smoking habit, therapeutic requirements (immunosuppressants, biologics, steroids, salicylates, drugs that cause enteropathy such as olmesartan, valsartan, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, etc, ...).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Clinical activity

Clinical activity was evaluated using the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) (cut-off values: \<5, remission; 5-7, mild activity; 8-16, moderate activity; and \>16, severe activity).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Laboratory data

Laboratory data: blood count, renal function and C-reactive protein, anti-transglutaminase antibodies, genetic study of celiac disease DQ2.5, DQ8, and DQ2.2, study of parasites, fecal calprotectin.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic and histology data

Endoscopic signs suggestive of CD in UDT (presence of canker sores, ulcers, ...) and colon inflammatory activity was evaluated when available in patients with active disease using the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD: 0-2, remission; 3-6, mild endoscopic activity; 7-15, moderate endoscopic activity; and \>15, severe endoscopic activity).

Duodenal biopsies were assessed by 2 pathologists and were evaluated according to Marsh classification modified by Ensari \[Marsh 0, 1, 2 or 3\], the limit of normality for intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) per 100 enterocytes is set at 25, gastric biopsies (determination of H. Pylori by immunohistochemistry) and esophageal biopsies was recorded too.

Percentage of lymphocyte subpopulations are assessed by flow cytometry.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (\> 18 years)
* Diagnosis of Crohn disease
* Diagnosis of Coeliac disease
* Control subjects
* Study period: The study period has been 36 months (June 2017 - June 2020)

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal of the patient to participate in the study
* Pregnancy
* Serious comorbidities: heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, bleeding disorders, etc
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Mutua de Terrassa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maria Esteve, PhD, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa

Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CROHNLY23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.