Trial Outcomes & Findings for Impact, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Bladder Basics (NCT NCT05852353)

NCT ID: NCT05852353

Last Updated: 2025-12-19

Results Overview

Recruitment was measured as the number and percentage of individuals who expressed interest, were screened, and provided consent.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

204 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

3 months

Results posted on

2025-12-19

Participant Flow

Parents of children aged 5-10 years with presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), defined as dysfunctional voiding scoring system (DVSS) score \> 6 for girls, \>9 for boys, were recruited from our pediatric urology clinic, local pediatric practices and the community. Community recruitment involved flyers posted in public libraries, community and childcare centers and community-based organizations.

268 families met eligibility criteria. 15 families submitted surveys the were found to be fraudulent. 102 families signed informed consent and were assigned to the study arm.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Single Arm Longitudinal Assessment
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Overall Study
STARTED
102
Overall Study
Signed informed consent (child with LUTS)
72
Overall Study
Signed informed consent (child did not have LUTS)
30
Overall Study
Completed intervention (child with LUTS)
52
Overall Study
Completed intervention (child did not have LUTS)
23
Overall Study
Completed 4-week survey (child with LUTS)
51
Overall Study
Completed 4-week survey (child did not have LUTS)
23
Overall Study
Completed 12-week survey (child with LUTS)
47
Overall Study
Completed 12-week survey (child did not have LUTS)
21
Overall Study
COMPLETED
68
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
34

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Single Arm Longitudinal Assessment
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Overall Study
Family (dyad with LUTS) who consented but withdrew
2
Overall Study
Family (dyad did not have LUTS) who consented but withdrew
1
Overall Study
Family (dyad) who consented but did not complete intervention
24
Overall Study
Family (dyad) who completed intervention but was lost to follow-up
7

Baseline Characteristics

Impact, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Bladder Basics

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad - Parent Participants
n=70 Participants
Each parent-child dyad receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Parent-Child Dyad - Child Participants
n=70 Participants
Each parent-child dyad receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Total
n=140 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
70 Participants
n=6 Participants
70 Participants
n=6 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
70 Participants
n=8 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
70 Participants
n=6 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
64 Participants
n=8 Participants
47 Participants
n=6 Participants
111 Participants
n=6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants
n=8 Participants
23 Participants
n=6 Participants
29 Participants
n=6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or European, not Hispanic or Latino
33 Participants
n=8 Participants
37 Participants
n=6 Participants
70 Participants
n=6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian or Asian American, not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants
n=8 Participants
21 Participants
n=6 Participants
48 Participants
n=6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino/a
8 Participants
n=8 Participants
7 Participants
n=6 Participants
15 Participants
n=6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American, not Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
2 Participants
n=6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Middle Eastern or North African
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
2 Participants
n=6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants
n=8 Participants
2 Participants
n=6 Participants
2 Participants
n=6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
70 Participants
n=8 Participants
70 Participants
n=6 Participants
140 Participants
n=6 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Population: Parent-child dyads who completed the screening survey.

Recruitment was measured as the number and percentage of individuals who expressed interest, were screened, and provided consent.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=429 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Number and Percentage of Participants Recruited
Expressed Interest (submitted survey) - all dyads
429 Participants
Number and Percentage of Participants Recruited
Eligible for Participation - dyads with LUTS at baseline
183 Participants
Number and Percentage of Participants Recruited
Consented - dyads with LUTS at baseline, excludes withdrawn dyads
70 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months

Population: Parent-child dyads who signed informed consent, did not withdraw, and in which the child in the dyad had presence of lower urinary tract symptoms at baseline (DVSS score \> 6 in girls, \> 9 in boys)

Engagement was measured by assessing the video completion rate (videos watched/total videos) as calculated by the video platform.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=70 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Engagement: Video Completion Rate
Completed 80% - 100% of the curriculum
50 Participants
Engagement: Video Completion Rate
Completed 20% - 80% of the curriculum
2 Participants
Engagement: Video Completion Rate
Completed 0% - 20% of the curriculum
18 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 4-weeks and 12-weeks

Population: Parent-child dyads who completed the Bladder Basics video (based on parent's self-report) and completed initial post-lesson survey, and in which the child in the dyad had presence of lower urinary tract symptoms at baseline (DVSS score \> 6 in girls, \> 9 in boys)

Post-assessment completion was measured as the percentage of participants who completed surveys following the Bladder Basics videos. After completing the videos, participants completed surveys to test knowledge, and collect data regarding user feedback and symptom improvement. The 2 post-intervention surveys were sent at 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=52 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Post-assessment Completion Rates
Completed 12-week survey
47 Participants
Post-assessment Completion Rates
Completed 4-week survey
51 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 4-weeks; 12-weeks

Population: Children with LUTS at baseline and who completed the 4-week and 12-week surveys, respectively.

To evaluate the impact of Bladder Basics on short- and long-term bladder health clinical outcomes by comparing baseline and post-intervention Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) questionnaire results in healthy children ages 5-10 years old with pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms. The survey consists of 10 questions, each scored from 0 to 3 (0 = Almost Never; 1 = Less Than Half the Time; 2 = About Half the Time; 3 = Almost Every Time). Scores were summed to create the overall score (0 to 30). Children with a higher DVSS score have more frequent symptoms and/or behavioral problems

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=51 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
baseline score - 4-week survey completers (both genders)
11.51 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.12
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
4-weeks score - 4-week survey completers (both genders)
8.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.61
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
baseline score - 4-week survey completers (girls)
11.38 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.41
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
baseline score - 4-week survey completers (boys)
11.86 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.25
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
4-weeks score - 4-week survey completers (boys)
8.93 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.34
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
baseline score - 12-week survey completers (both genders)
11.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.17
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
12-weeks score - 12-week survey completers (both genders)
6.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.87
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
12-weeks score - 12-week survey completers (girls)
6.80 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.95
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
baseline score - 12-week survey completers (boys)
11.92 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.35
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
12-weeks score - 12-week survey completers (boys)
6.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.73
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
4-weeks score - 4-week survey completers (girls)
8.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.37
Change in Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) to Evaluate Bladder Health Clinical Outcomes
baseline score - 12-week survey completers (girls)
11.40 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Post-lesson (approximately 4 weeks) and 12 weeks post-intervention

Population: Parents of children with LUTS at baseline and who completed immediate post-video survey and 12-week survey, respectively.

To evaluate the impact of Bladder Basics on improving knowledge of pediatric bladder health practices by comparing baseline pre-intervention to post-intervention survey results in parents of healthy children ages 5-10 years old with pediatric lower urinary tract symptoms. Knowledge surveys will be created by study team. The survey consists of 11 questions. Correct answers are scored as 1, incorrect answers are scored as 0. Question scores were summed to create an overall score of 0 to 11, with higher scores corresponding to better knowledge about bladder health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=52 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Pre-intervention to Post-intervention Knowledge Survey Created by ResearchTeam
Baseline - post-lesson survey completers
10 score on a scale
Interval 9.0 to 11.0
Pre-intervention to Post-intervention Knowledge Survey Created by ResearchTeam
Baseline - 12-week survey completers
10 score on a scale
Interval 9.0 to 11.0
Pre-intervention to Post-intervention Knowledge Survey Created by ResearchTeam
Post-lesson score - post-lesson survey completers
11 score on a scale
Interval 10.25 to 11.0
Pre-intervention to Post-intervention Knowledge Survey Created by ResearchTeam
12-week score - 12-week survey completers
11 score on a scale
Interval 11.0 to 11.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: Parents of children with LUTS at baseline and who completed the baseline and 4-week surveys.

To measure the acceptability and feasibility of the Bladder Basics education program. The self-efficacy survey is adapted from Parents Patient Activation Measure-13 (PPAM-13). Participants answered questions as strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree, and NA. Raw scores were transformed to an overall scale of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=51 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Validated Self-efficacy Survey
Baseline
63.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.82
Validated Self-efficacy Survey
4-weeks
70.84 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.16

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Immediately after completing the videos (up to 4 weeks following baseline)

Population: Parents of children with LUTS at baseline who completed the intervention.

To measure the acceptability and feasibility of the Bladder Basics education program. The acceptability survey is developed based on the Technology Acceptance Theory. The survey contains 13 questions assessing perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude towards intervention, and behavioral intention for future use. Each question is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale, each with a range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Scores are summed and averaged to create the overall score, with a range of 1 to 5 (higher scores indicate better acceptability).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=52 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Validated Acceptability Survey
4.306 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.490

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Immediately after completing the videos (up to 4 weeks following baseline)

Population: Parents of children with LUTS at baseline who completed the intervention.

To measure the acceptability and feasibility of the Bladder Basics education program. This survey is adapted from the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction (ARCS) questionnaire. Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not true) to 5 (very true). Scores are summed and averaged to create overall score (range: 1 to 5). Higher scores indicate better education design.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=52 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Validated Education Design Survey -- Parents
4.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Immediately after completing the videos (up to 4 weeks following baseline)

Population: Children with LUTS at baseline who completed the intervention.

To measure the acceptability and feasibility of the Bladder Basics education program. This survey is adapted from the Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction (ARCS) questionnaire. Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not true) to 5 (very true).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=52 Participants
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Fun · Strongly disagree
1 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Fun · Disagree
1 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Fun · Neither agree or disagree
4 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Fun · Agree
15 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Fun · Strongly agree
31 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Important · Strongly disagree
1 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Important · Disagree
1 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Important · Neither agree or disagree
2 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Important · Agree
12 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Important · Strongly agree
36 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Easy · Strongly disagree
0 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Easy · Disagree
1 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Easy · Neither agree or disagree
7 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Easy · Agree
20 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Easy · Strongly agree
24 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Enjoyable · Strongly disagree
3 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Enjoyable · Disagree
1 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Enjoyable · Neither agree or disagree
2 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Enjoyable · Agree
16 Participants
Validated Education Design Survey - Children
Enjoyable · Strongly agree
30 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Immediately after completing the videos (up to 4 weeks following baseline)

Population: The Overall Number of Participants Analyzed represents the number of parent-child dyads who completed the Bladder Basics video (based on parent's self-report) and who completed initial post-intervention survey, and in which the child in the dyad had presence of lower urinary tract symptoms at baseline (DVSS score \> 6 in girls, \> 9 in boys).

Number of excerpted items obtained from participant feedback according to topic area. To measure acceptability and feasibility of Bladder Basics with consideration of stakeholder, educational design, and behavioral change theory barriers. Open-ended feedback questions were used to characterize the intervention's ability to be used as a population-level intervention. Feedback was coded according to topic area.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Parent-Child Dyad
n=312 Excerpts
Each family (parent-child dyad) receives the intervention (digital pediatric bladder health patient education curriculum). The intervention consists of 7 videos that can be viewed over a time period of up to 4 weeks.
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Affective attitude
48 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Age appropriateness
10 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Burden
90 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Course content: Educational topics
15 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Course content: Presentation format
43 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Future content: Epidemiology of pediatric bladder health
3 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Future content: Bathroom use best practices
8 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Future content: Bathroom pathology content
28 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Future content: Dietary Information and Bowel habits
9 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Future content: Format suggestions
10 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Future content: No changes needed
24 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
General acceptability
6 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Intervention coherence
6 Excerpts
Open-ended Feedback Questions to Measure Acceptability and Feasibility of Education Program
Perceived effectiveness
12 Excerpts

Adverse Events

Parent-Child Dyad - Parent Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Parent-Child Dyad - Child Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Kathleen Kan, MD

Stanford University

Phone: (650) 497-8000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place