Trial Outcomes & Findings for McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence Intubation (NCT NCT05850052)
NCT ID: NCT05850052
Last Updated: 2025-02-03
Results Overview
The visualization of the vocal cords, defined using the modified Cormack and Lehane classification: Grade I: Full view of the glottis (vocal cords are completely visible). Grade IIa: Partial view of the glottis (only the posterior portion of the glottis is visible). Grade IIb: Only the arytenoids or the posterior extremity of the vocal cords are visible (the anterior commissure is not seen). Grade III: Only the epiglottis is visible (the glottis is not visible). Grade IV: Neither the epiglottis nor the glottis is visible (only the soft palate is seen).
COMPLETED
NA
400 participants
From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery, up to 12 hours.
2025-02-03
Participant Flow
Randomization data were missing for n = 6 patients.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
McGrath Videolaryngoscope for Rapid Endotracheal Intubation
The researchers will use the McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation.
McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation: Visualize a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
Efficacy of Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
The researchers seeks to compare the efficacy of conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade,
Conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade: Examine a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
193
|
201
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
193
|
201
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Gender data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
McGrath Videolaryngoscope for Rapid Endotracheal Intubation
n=193 Participants
The researchers will use the McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation.
McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation: Visualize a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
Efficacy of Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
n=201 Participants
The researchers seeks to compare the efficacy of conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade,
Conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade: Examine a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
Total
n=394 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46 years
n=193 Participants
|
46 years
n=201 Participants
|
46 years
n=394 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
119 Participants
n=193 Participants • Gender data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
109 Participants
n=200 Participants • Gender data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
228 Participants
n=393 Participants • Gender data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
74 Participants
n=193 Participants • Gender data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
91 Participants
n=200 Participants • Gender data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
165 Participants
n=393 Participants • Gender data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Study center
Istanbul
|
96 participants
n=193 Participants
|
104 participants
n=201 Participants
|
200 participants
n=394 Participants
|
|
Study center
Konya
|
97 participants
n=193 Participants
|
97 participants
n=201 Participants
|
194 participants
n=394 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
28 kg/m^2
n=193 Participants
|
28 kg/m^2
n=201 Participants
|
28 kg/m^2
n=394 Participants
|
|
History of difficult airway
Yes
|
6 Participants
n=193 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
7 Participants
n=200 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
13 Participants
n=393 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
History of difficult airway
No
|
187 Participants
n=193 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
193 Participants
n=200 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
380 Participants
n=393 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
Mallampati score
I (Soft palate, uvula, pillars visible
|
59 Participants
n=192 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
54 Participants
n=196 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
113 Participants
n=388 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
Mallampati score
II (Soft palate, major part of uvula visible)
|
89 Participants
n=192 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
104 Participants
n=196 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
193 Participants
n=388 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
Mallampati score
III (Soft palate, base of uvula visible)
|
39 Participants
n=192 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
35 Participants
n=196 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
74 Participants
n=388 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
Mallampati score
IV (Only hard palate visible
|
5 Participants
n=192 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
3 Participants
n=196 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
8 Participants
n=388 Participants • The Mallampati score is missing for 1 patient in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group and for 5 patients in the direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
ASA physical status
1 (Healthy)
|
41 Participants
n=193 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
39 Participants
n=200 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
80 Participants
n=393 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
ASA physical status
2 (Mild systemic illness)
|
124 Participants
n=193 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
135 Participants
n=200 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
259 Participants
n=393 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
|
ASA physical status
3 (Severe systemic illness)
|
28 Participants
n=193 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
26 Participants
n=200 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
54 Participants
n=393 Participants • This data for one patient is missing in Direct laryngoscopy group
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery, up to 12 hours.The visualization of the vocal cords, defined using the modified Cormack and Lehane classification: Grade I: Full view of the glottis (vocal cords are completely visible). Grade IIa: Partial view of the glottis (only the posterior portion of the glottis is visible). Grade IIb: Only the arytenoids or the posterior extremity of the vocal cords are visible (the anterior commissure is not seen). Grade III: Only the epiglottis is visible (the glottis is not visible). Grade IV: Neither the epiglottis nor the glottis is visible (only the soft palate is seen).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
McGrath Videolaryngoscope for Rapid Endotracheal Intubation
n=193 Participants
The researchers will use the McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation.
McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation: Visualize a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
Efficacy of Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
n=201 Participants
The researchers seeks to compare the efficacy of conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade,
Conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade: Examine a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Visualization of the Vocal Cords
Grade I - Full view of the glottis
|
90 Participants
|
85 Participants
|
|
Visualization of the Vocal Cords
Grade IIa - Partial view of the glottis
|
63 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
|
Visualization of the Vocal Cords
Grade IIb - Only the arytenoids or the posterior extremity of the vocal cords are visible
|
26 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Visualization of the Vocal Cords
Grade III - Only the epiglottis is visible
|
10 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Visualization of the Vocal Cords
Grade IV - Neither the epiglottis nor the glottis is visible
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery, up to 12 hours.Population: N = 4 patients were missing the number of attempts in the McGrath Videolaryngoscope group. N = 3 patients were missing the number of attempts in the Direct Laryngoscopy group.
An intubation attempt was recorded once the endotracheal tube entered the oral cavity
Outcome measures
| Measure |
McGrath Videolaryngoscope for Rapid Endotracheal Intubation
n=189 Participants
The researchers will use the McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation.
McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation: Visualize a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
Efficacy of Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
n=198 Participants
The researchers seeks to compare the efficacy of conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade,
Conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade: Examine a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With 1, 2, 3, and 4 Intubation Attempts
1 intubation attempt
|
167 Participants
|
176 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With 1, 2, 3, and 4 Intubation Attempts
2 intubation attempts
|
21 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With 1, 2, 3, and 4 Intubation Attempts
3 intubation attempts
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With 1, 2, 3, and 4 Intubation Attempts
4 intubation attempts
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From the start time of intubation to time of the end of surgery, up to 12 hours.Intubation was considered a failure if there was: (1) a failure to intubate after 3 attempts, (2) the need to switch intubators or intubation device, or (3) the need to stop study per anesthesiologist's discretion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
McGrath Videolaryngoscope for Rapid Endotracheal Intubation
n=193 Participants
The researchers will use the McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation.
McGrath videolaryngoscope for rapid sequence endotracheal intubation: Visualize a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
Efficacy of Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
n=201 Participants
The researchers seeks to compare the efficacy of conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade,
Conventional direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade: Examine a patient's airway to aid placement of tracheal tube with ease.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intubation Failure.
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
McGrath Videolaryngoscope for Rapid Endotracheal Intubation
Efficacy of Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place