Y-3 Injection Through Skull Bone Marrow in the Treatment of Acute Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction (SOLUTION)
NCT ID: NCT05849805
Last Updated: 2024-04-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-17
2024-01-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Transplantation for Stroke Patients
NCT01028794
Multiple Burrhole Therapy With Erythropoietin for Unstable Moyamoya
NCT03162588
Feasability Study of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Treatment of CLI
NCT00595257
Umbilical Cord Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Treatment in Ischemic Stroke
NCT02580019
Autologous Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BMSCs) Transplantation in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke
NCT05850208
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility, safety and efficacy of Intracalvaria bone marrow injection of cytoprotective drug Y-3 in mMCAI patients with contradictions of reperfusion therapy or poor reperfusion outcome.
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) clinical trial. The trial planned to enroll 20 patients with mMCAI, aged 18-85 years, within 24 hours of onset, with contradictions of reperfusion therapy or poor reperfusion outcome.
Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the following 2 groups at 1:1 ratio.
Intracalvaria bone marrow injection group: intracalvaria bone marrow injection Y-3 (dose was given as 32 ug/kg)once a day for 3 consecutive days, as well as standard treatment and management according to the related guidelines.
Conventional treatment group: standard treatment and management according to related guidelines
Face to face interviews will be made on baseline, 4±1 days after randomization, 7±2 days after randomization, 14±2 days after randomization or discharge day, and 90 days after randomization.
The primary outcomes include feasibility outcomes and safety outcomes. Feasibility Outcomes include the internal plate of skull was drilled throughly, drug leakage during injection, the patient refused to continue, failure for other reasons during 3 days'treatment. Safety Outcomes includes Infection events (skin infection, osteomyelitis, or intracranial infection), symptomatic and non-symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, moderate to severe bleeding(defined by the GUSTO), hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency during the treatment, severe or extremely severe anaemia (hemoglobin \<60g / L), mortality, incidence of other adverse events / serious adverse events reported. The secondary outcomes include change of the NIHSS scores from baseline to 14±2 days or at discharge, the NIHSS scores improved by 4 points from baseline at 7±2 days, the NIHSS limb score improved by 2 points from baseline at 7±2 days, change of core infarction volume from baseline to 7±2 days, change of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores from baseline values to 14±2 days or at discharge, the modified Rankin Scale(mRS) 0-3 points at 90±7 days, Rate of decompressive hemicraniectomy according to guidelines within 90±7 days, Rate of decompressive hemicraniectomy within 90±7 days, neurological intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization days, cost of the NICU hospitalization
Safety indicators will be compared using the Fisher exact probability method. Primary effectiveness measures will be tested by the t-test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Secondary effectiveness measures will use the Fisher exact probability method, where the comparison of neurofunction scale or daily living energy scale will be performed using non-parametric analysis. NICU hospitalization days and NICU hospitalization costs differences will be compared using the t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All statistics will be two-sided, P \<0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intracalvaria bone marrow injection group
Y-3 ,Intracalvaria bone marrow injection , continuous medication for 3 days, with standard treatment and management according to the related guidelines.
Intracalvaria bone marrow injection
Intracalvaria bone marrow injection Y-3 (dose was given at 32 ug/kg), continuous medication for 3 days
Conventional treatment
standard treatment and management according to related guidelines
Conventional treatment group
standard treatment and management according to related guidelines
Conventional treatment
standard treatment and management according to related guidelines
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intracalvaria bone marrow injection
Intracalvaria bone marrow injection Y-3 (dose was given at 32 ug/kg), continuous medication for 3 days
Conventional treatment
standard treatment and management according to related guidelines
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
A.Acute cerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage B. Acute posterior circulation infarction C.Other types of TOAST classification such as intracranial artery dissection, vasculitis and moyamoya disease
2. Hemorrhagic transformation in the infarct area, over 30% of the infarct area, and significant occupancy effect
3. Bilateral pupil fixation / pupillary reflex disappeared
4. Decompressive craniectomy was planned before randomization
5. Resistant hypertension (systolic\> 200mmHg or diastolic\> 110mmHg) or hypotension (systolic \<70mmHg or diastolic \<50mmHg)
6. Abnormal blood glycemia before randomization (random venous blood glucose \<2.8 mmol/L or\> 23 mmol/L)
7. Severe hepatic or renal insufficiency (Note: severe hepatic insufficiency refers to the ALT\> 3 times the upper limit of normal or the AST \> 3 times the upper limit of normal; severe renal insufficiency means the creatinine value\> 1.5 times the upper limit of normal or GFR \<40 ml/min/1.73m2)
8. Severe cardiac insufficiency before randomization (compliance with New York College of Cardiology (NYHA) Cardiac Function Class III, IV)
9. Dual antiplatelet (aspirin plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor or cilostazol) within 24 hours or tirofiban within 4 hours
10. Combining with contraindications for intra-diplo administration, such as skull fracture, skull infection, subdural / external hematoma, subscalp hematoma, scalp skin or subcutaneous infection, etc
11. Bleeding tendency (including but not limited to): platelet count \<100×109 / L; received heparin within nearly 24h, APTT ≥35s; oral warfarin, INR\>1.7; new-oral-anticoagulant orally; with direct thrombin or factor Xa inhibitor; Combining with coagulopathy such as hemophilia
12. presence of severe or very severe anemia (hemoglobin \<60g / L)
13. Combining with respiratory failure, and still difficult to correct after endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy, requiring ventilator treatment
14. Combining with severe CNS degenerative disease, such as AD, PD and severe dementia from various causes
15. Combining with other organic diseases, such as malignancy, the patient's life expectancy is less than 3 months
16. Allergy to any component of the therapeutic drug
17. Other neuroprotective agents without guideline recommendations and with unknown mechanism of the most important component were used within 24 hours of onset
18. Patients with pregnancy, lactation, or a possible pregnancy and a planned pregnancy
19. Unable to comply with the trial protocol or follow-up requirements
20. Other circumstances deemed unsuitable by investigator
21. Also participate in other interventional clinical trials
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
yilong Wang
Vice President of Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Beijing, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wijdicks EF, Sheth KN, Carter BS, Greer DM, Kasner SE, Kimberly WT, Schwab S, Smith EE, Tamargo RJ, Wintermark M; American Heart Association Stroke Council. Recommendations for the management of cerebral and cerebellar infarction with swelling: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Apr;45(4):1222-38. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000441965.15164.d6. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
Treadwell SD, Thanvi B. Malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Postgrad Med J. 2010 Apr;86(1014):235-42. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.094292.
Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, De Marchis GM, Fonseca AC, Padiglioni C, de la Ossa NP, Strbian D, Tsivgoulis G, Turc G. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2021 Mar;6(1):I-LXII. doi: 10.1177/2396987321989865. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
Jadhav AP, Desai SM, Jovin TG. Indications for Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Current Guidelines and Beyond. Neurology. 2021 Nov 16;97(20 Suppl 2):S126-S136. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012801.
Wu S, Wu B, Liu M, Chen Z, Wang W, Anderson CS, Sandercock P, Wang Y, Huang Y, Cui L, Pu C, Jia J, Zhang T, Liu X, Zhang S, Xie P, Fan D, Ji X, Wong KL, Wang L; China Stroke Study Collaboration. Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):394-405. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30500-3.
Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, Amelink GJ, Schmiedeck P, Schwab S, Rothwell PM, Bousser MG, van der Worp HB, Hacke W; DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007 Mar;6(3):215-22. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70036-4.
Kolias AG, Kirkpatrick PJ, Hutchinson PJ. Decompressive craniectomy: past, present and future. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Jul;9(7):405-15. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.106. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
Chamorro A, Dirnagl U, Urra X, Planas AM. Neuroprotection in acute stroke: targeting excitotoxicity, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and inflammation. Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jul;15(8):869-881. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00114-9. Epub 2016 May 11.
Ugalde-Trivino L, Diaz-Guerra M. PSD-95: An Effective Target for Stroke Therapy Using Neuroprotective Peptides. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;22(22):12585. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212585.
Zhou L, Li F, Xu HB, Luo CX, Wu HY, Zhu MM, Lu W, Ji X, Zhou QG, Zhu DY. Treatment of cerebral ischemia by disrupting ischemia-induced interaction of nNOS with PSD-95. Nat Med. 2010 Dec;16(12):1439-43. doi: 10.1038/nm.2245. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
Hill MD, Goyal M, Menon BK, Nogueira RG, McTaggart RA, Demchuk AM, Poppe AY, Buck BH, Field TS, Dowlatshahi D, van Adel BA, Swartz RH, Shah RA, Sauvageau E, Zerna C, Ospel JM, Joshi M, Almekhlafi MA, Ryckborst KJ, Lowerison MW, Heard K, Garman D, Haussen D, Cutting SM, Coutts SB, Roy D, Rempel JL, Rohr AC, Iancu D, Sahlas DJ, Yu AYX, Devlin TG, Hanel RA, Puetz V, Silver FL, Campbell BCV, Chapot R, Teitelbaum J, Mandzia JL, Kleinig TJ, Turkel-Parrella D, Heck D, Kelly ME, Bharatha A, Bang OY, Jadhav A, Gupta R, Frei DF, Tarpley JW, McDougall CG, Holmin S, Rha JH, Puri AS, Camden MC, Thomalla G, Choe H, Phillips SJ, Schindler JL, Thornton J, Nagel S, Heo JH, Sohn SI, Psychogios MN, Budzik RF, Starkman S, Martin CO, Burns PA, Murphy S, Lopez GA, English J, Tymianski M; ESCAPE-NA1 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):878-887. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30258-0. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
Daneman R, Prat A. The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Jan 5;7(1):a020412. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020412.
Terstappen GC, Meyer AH, Bell RD, Zhang W. Strategies for delivering therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021 May;20(5):362-383. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00139-y. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Charabati M, Rabanel JM, Ramassamy C, Prat A. Overcoming the Brain Barriers: From Immune Cells to Nanoparticles. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Jan;41(1):42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
Xie J, Shen Z, Anraku Y, Kataoka K, Chen X. Nanomaterial-based blood-brain-barrier (BBB) crossing strategies. Biomaterials. 2019 Dec;224:119491. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119491. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
Herisson F, Frodermann V, Courties G, Rohde D, Sun Y, Vandoorne K, Wojtkiewicz GR, Masson GS, Vinegoni C, Kim J, Kim DE, Weissleder R, Swirski FK, Moskowitz MA, Nahrendorf M. Direct vascular channels connect skull bone marrow and the brain surface enabling myeloid cell migration. Nat Neurosci. 2018 Sep;21(9):1209-1217. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0213-2. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
Brioschi S, Wang WL, Peng V, Wang M, Shchukina I, Greenberg ZJ, Bando JK, Jaeger N, Czepielewski RS, Swain A, Mogilenko DA, Beatty WL, Bayguinov P, Fitzpatrick JAJ, Schuettpelz LG, Fronick CC, Smirnov I, Kipnis J, Shapiro VS, Wu GF, Gilfillan S, Cella M, Artyomov MN, Kleinstein SH, Colonna M. Heterogeneity of meningeal B cells reveals a lymphopoietic niche at the CNS borders. Science. 2021 Jul 23;373(6553):eabf9277. doi: 10.1126/science.abf9277. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
Pulous FE, Cruz-Hernandez JC, Yang C, Kaya Zeta, Paccalet A, Wojtkiewicz G, Capen D, Brown D, Wu JW, Schloss MJ, Vinegoni C, Richter D, Yamazoe M, Hulsmans M, Momin N, Grune J, Rohde D, McAlpine CS, Panizzi P, Weissleder R, Kim DE, Swirski FK, Lin CP, Moskowitz MA, Nahrendorf M. Cerebrospinal fluid can exit into the skull bone marrow and instruct cranial hematopoiesis in mice with bacterial meningitis. Nat Neurosci. 2022 May;25(5):567-576. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01060-2. Epub 2022 May 2.
Mazzitelli JA, Smyth LCD, Cross KA, Dykstra T, Sun J, Du S, Mamuladze T, Smirnov I, Rustenhoven J, Kipnis J. Cerebrospinal fluid regulates skull bone marrow niches via direct access through dural channels. Nat Neurosci. 2022 May;25(5):555-560. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01029-1. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KY2023-052-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.