Patient Perspectives of an Automated Falls-Risk Screening and Referral Tool in the Emergency Department (ED)
NCT ID: NCT05846685
Last Updated: 2025-03-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
174 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-02-22
2026-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of an Automated Falls-Risk Screening and Referral Tool in the Emergency Department (ED)
NCT05810064
Incidence and Factors of Functional Decline After Emergency Department Discharge in Older Adults With Falls
NCT07163715
Fall Detection and Prevention System for the Elderly
NCT03808831
HOMEStudy: Development of a Home-based Self-delivered Prehabilitation Intervention to Proactively Reduce Fall Risk in Older Adults
NCT05583578
Vision Screening in Hospitals for Older Adults Following a Fall
NCT06645080
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phone interviews will be conducted with a minimum of 12 referred patients per each of the 3 ED sites, approximately half of whom scheduled and completed a Falls Clinic visit, and half whom declined or did not complete an appointment. Interview questions include a mix of verbally-delivered Likert-type rating scales and open-ended questions evaluating their experience of the referral process (e.g., verbal communication, written information received), appropriateness of the CDS screening tool, and perceived value of the intervention for preventing falls.
Additionally, in person interviews will be conducted with a minimum of 10 patients each at the American Center and Swedish American Hospital sites prior to implementation of the intervention at these sites. These will be conducted among patients aged 65 and older who are in the emergency department and likely to be discharged. These interviews will be aimed at collecting patient input necessary to adapt the design of the intervention at these sites. Interview questions will include open-ended questions evaluating the perceived value of the the intervention for preventing falls as well as potential barriers and facilitators to completing the intervention at these sites. Interviews will be conducted by ED staff trained and experienced in research data collection in the ED to minimize interruption of clinical workflows. In consultation with provider teams, interviewers will time interviews to avoid clinical interventions, and will pause research activities while any clinical care is taking place.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ED Patients Scheduled and Completed Falls Clinic Visit
Patients age 65 and Older identified by the automated system as being high-risk of future falls, and subsequently referred to the UW Health Mobility and Falls Clinic by the ED provider at discharge
Patient Phone Interviews
Collecting perceptions about automated falls-risk screening and referral tool
ED Patients Declined or Did Not Complete Falls Clinic Visit
Patients age 65 and Older identified by the automated system as being high-risk of future falls, and subsequently referred to the UW Health Mobility and Falls Clinic by the ED provider at discharge
Patient Phone Interviews
Collecting perceptions about automated falls-risk screening and referral tool
ED Patients Likely to be Discharged
Patients aged 65 and older who are in the emergency department and likely to be discharged.
Patient In Person Interviews
Interviews will be aimed at collecting patient input necessary to adapt the design of the intervention at these sites.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Phone Interviews
Collecting perceptions about automated falls-risk screening and referral tool
Patient In Person Interviews
Interviews will be aimed at collecting patient input necessary to adapt the design of the intervention at these sites.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English-speaking
* Reliable access to a working telephone and can accept incoming phone calls
* For In-person interviews in the ED:
* ED patients age 65 and older in the emergency department for any reason who are identified as likely to be discharged by their clinical team.
Exclusion Criteria
* Lacks capacity to consent
* Unable to hear or speak on the telephone, even with the use of assistive devices
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
FED
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Brian W Patterson, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Swedish American Emergency Department
Rockford, Illinois, United States
The American Center Emergency Department
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
UWHC Emergency Department
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.