A Study Comparing Urolift and TURP Ahead of Radiotherapy in Men With Urinary Symptoms Secondary to Prostate Enlargement
NCT ID: NCT05840549
Last Updated: 2023-09-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-09
2025-05-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Around half of men diagnosed with prostate cancer will also have an enlarged prostate making it difficult to pass urine. When having radiotherapy, the prostate swells further which can lead to complete blockage of urine flow (urine retention), sepsis and kidney failure in severe cases. Radiotherapy itself can also cause urinary symptoms meaning that some patients can continue to have difficulty passing urine long after their cancer treatment finishes. Around a third of patients will need an operation to shrink their prostate before radiotherapy to prevent these possible short and long-term problems.
The standard operation is a transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). This involves cutting a channel through the prostate to improve urine flow.
This will be compared with a newer procedure known as UroLift. During UroLift, clips are inserted into the water pipe to pin back the prostate to widen the channel and improve urine flow. Which treatment is more acceptable to patients and gives better outcomes has never been tested before in men having radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
The study will help us to understand how the treatments impact on a patient's quality of life and understand what matters most to patients.
The results of this feasibility study will help us design a bigger study to assess TURP and UroLift in a larger group of patients across different hospitals. This research will help future patients make decisions about prostate cancer treatment choices that can affect their long-term well-being.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnetic Nanoparticle Thermoablation-Retention and Maintenance in the Prostate:A Phase 0 Study in Men
NCT02033447
Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) Pre-/Post-Radiation Treatment for Prostate Cancer
NCT03817216
Evaluation of Clarity Ultrasound Guidance for Prostate Therapy
NCT02388308
Urolift Pre-SBRT for Reduced Urinary Toxicity in Patients With BPH and Prostate Cancer.
NCT05148156
Robotic Surgery After Focal Ablation Therapy
NCT03011606
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The short-term complications of untreated BOO in the context of prostate radiotherapy, although relatively rare, can be disastrous, leading to urinary retention, sepsis and renal failure. In the long-term, urinary symptoms and complications can continue to worsen. Patients with low flow rates pre-radiotherapy are at highest risk of urinary retention and are often offered transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) prior to radiotherapy. An urgent transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) either during or post radiotherapy may significantly disrupt the completion of the treatment and compromise outcomes, both oncological and functional. Case studies suggest that when patients undergo a TURP to treat prostate enlargement after radiotherapy, the risk of incontinence is much higher than surgery before radiotherapy. Therefore, for radiotherapy to safely go ahead, BOO due to an enlarged prostate must first be addressed. UroLift is a newer, minimally invasive alternative to TURP, approved by NICE for use in BPH and available in over 100 trusts nationally. A growing body of evidence including three meta-analyses supports its use in benign disease.
UroLift has not been trialled in patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy with coexisting LUTS. A subgroup analysis performed on retrospective data suggested that patients who had previously undergone prostate radiotherapy experienced symptom relief without an increase in adverse events.
The purpose of this trial is to produce a protocol for a randomised controlled evaluation of clinical and cost effectiveness of UroLift in comparison to TURP for men due to receive radiotherapy as treatment for prostate cancer. At the end of this study, we will understand whether such a trial is acceptable to all stakeholders, is methodologically robust and thus feasible. Furthermore, we will be able to report pilot findings for safety and efficacy
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TURP
Transurethral Resection of Prostate
TURP
TURP is an operation which can be performed under a general / regional anaesthetic. A cystoscope is passed into the urethra meatus, along the length of the urethra to the level of the prostate. The obstructing prostate lobes are resected using mono polar or bipolar energy to create a channel for improved urinary flow. Haemostasis is achieved by coagulation followed by insertion of a catheter for irrigation post procedure. Generally, patients stay for 1-2 nights post operatively. On the day of discharge the catheter is removed.
UroLift
UroLift
UroLift
UroLift (Neotract) is a NICE-approved alternative to TURP that can be performed under local anaesthetic, sedation or general anaesthetic. The system comprises of two single-use components, a delivery device and an implant. The implant is made of a nitinol capsular tab, a polyethylene terephthalate monofilament and a stainless-steel end-piece. Again, a modified cystoscope is passed into the urethral meatus, along the length of the urethra to the level of the prostate. The delivery device deploys the implants into the prostate to 'pin' back the lobes of the prostate to create a channel for improved flow. Typically, 2-4 implants are used per procedure. Nine out of ten patients do not require a catheter post procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TURP
TURP is an operation which can be performed under a general / regional anaesthetic. A cystoscope is passed into the urethra meatus, along the length of the urethra to the level of the prostate. The obstructing prostate lobes are resected using mono polar or bipolar energy to create a channel for improved urinary flow. Haemostasis is achieved by coagulation followed by insertion of a catheter for irrigation post procedure. Generally, patients stay for 1-2 nights post operatively. On the day of discharge the catheter is removed.
UroLift
UroLift (Neotract) is a NICE-approved alternative to TURP that can be performed under local anaesthetic, sedation or general anaesthetic. The system comprises of two single-use components, a delivery device and an implant. The implant is made of a nitinol capsular tab, a polyethylene terephthalate monofilament and a stainless-steel end-piece. Again, a modified cystoscope is passed into the urethral meatus, along the length of the urethra to the level of the prostate. The delivery device deploys the implants into the prostate to 'pin' back the lobes of the prostate to create a channel for improved flow. Typically, 2-4 implants are used per procedure. Nine out of ten patients do not require a catheter post procedure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with moderate to severe and/or bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to prostate enlargement and/or an obstructive flow rate
* Patients willing and able to provide written informed consent for the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unfavourable anatomical features (e.g. large middle lobe, for UroLift this requires advanced techniques that have not been fully evaluated in the benign setting(11)
* Prostates over 100g (as per manufacturer's guidelines)
* Co-morbidities precluding surgical intervention
* Prior prostate cancer treatment (including radical prostatectomy, focal therapy i.e. brachytherapy / high intensity focal ultrasound)
* Prior surgical intervention for benign prostatic hyperplasia (including prior UroLift / TURP / other prostate de-obstructing procedures)
* Urinary symptoms not due to prostatic enlargement as primary cause (i.e. neurological disease)
* Patients with complications of prostate enlargement including catheter dependent retention, recurrent urinary tract infections, bladder stones, obstructive uropathy
* Urinary incontinence due to an incompetent sphincter
* Co-existing gross haematuria
* Current active urinary tract infection
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King's College London
OTHER
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
OTHER
North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
University College, London
OTHER
City, University of London
OTHER
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Georges University Hospital
London, Lon, United Kingdom
Kathie Wong
Carlisle, , United Kingdom
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jai Seth
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wong K, Kinsella N, Seth J, Nicol D, Cahill D, Kasivisvanathan R, Withington J, Moghul M, Moss CL, Van Hemelrijck M, Giorgakoudi K, Cottrell C, Yates E, Khoo V, James ND. COmparing Urolift and Standard Transurethral resection of prostate Ahead of Radiotherapy in men with urinary symptoms secondary to prostate enlargement in Southwest London and North Cumbria (CO-STAR): a study protocol for a randomised feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 6;13(10):e076621. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076621.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CCR5668
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.