Efficacy and Safety of Prilocaine 2% and Lidocaine 5% Hyperbaric Against Spinal Anesthesia in Post Cystoscopy Procedure
NCT ID: NCT05834647
Last Updated: 2023-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group P
Drug: prilocaine 2% Dosage : 50 mg prilocaine 2% (2.5 mL volume)
Prilocaine 2%
50 mg prilocaine 2% (2.5 mL volume) before undergoing cystoscopy procedure
Group L
Drug: hyperbaric lidocaine 5% Dosage : 50 mg hyperbaric lidocaine 5% (1 mL volume)
Hyperbaric Lidocaine 5%
50 mg Hyperbaric Lidocaine 5% (1.0 mL volume) before undergoing cystoscopy procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prilocaine 2%
50 mg prilocaine 2% (2.5 mL volume) before undergoing cystoscopy procedure
Hyperbaric Lidocaine 5%
50 mg Hyperbaric Lidocaine 5% (1.0 mL volume) before undergoing cystoscopy procedure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients age between 18-60 years
3. Normal BMI according to WHO (World Health Organization) classification (18.5-24.9 kg/m2)
4. Physical status ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I or ASA II according to the ASA Physical Status Classification System by the American Society of Anesthesiologists in 2020.
5. Do not have a history of disease, medication, and medical procedures related to coronary heart disease
6. There are no absolute contraindications for spinal anesthesia
7. Do not take non-steroidal analgesics and steroids within 2 weeks before surgery.
8. Do not have history and treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.
9. Willing to participate in research and sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Have a direct relative with the research team.
3. Known or suspected to HIV infection.
4. History of hypersensitivity to prilocaine or lidocaine.
5. Patients with impaired renal, hepatic, cardiac rhythm, neurologic function, myopathy, thrombocytopenia (\<100,000/mL), and coagulopathy (international normalized ratio \>1.5)
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education
UNKNOWN
Universitas Sebelas Maret
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Septian Adi Permana. MD
Staff Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Purwoko Purwoko, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Afari N, Mostoufi S, Noonan C, Poeschla B, Succop A, Chopko L, Strachan E. C-reactive protein and pain sensitivity: findings from female twins. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Oct;42(2):277-83. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9297-6.
Banerjee D, Perrett C, Banerjee A. Troponins, Acute Coronary Syndrome and Renal Disease: From Acute Kidney Injury Through End-stage Kidney Disease. Eur Cardiol. 2019 Dec 18;14(3):187-190. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.28.2. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Summer;59(2):90-101; quiz 102-3. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90.
Choi HR, Song IA, Oh TK, Jeon YT. Perioperative C-reactive protein is associated with pain outcomes after major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 27;12:1041-1051. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S187249. eCollection 2019.
Ezmek B, Arslan A, Delilbasi C, Sencift K. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):354-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000400006.
Garg P, Morris P, Fazlanie AL, Vijayan S, Dancso B, Dastidar AG, Plein S, Mueller C, Haaf P. Cardiac biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome: from history to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;12(2):147-155. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1612-1. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
Hu H, Qin B, He D, Lu Y, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang S. Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0126587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126587. eCollection 2015.
Kato J, Svensson CI. Role of extracellular damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) as mediators of persistent pain. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;131:251-79. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2014.11.014. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
Koo CH, Ryu JH. Anesthetic considerations for urologic surgeries. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr;73(2):92-102. doi: 10.4097/kja.19437. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
Manassero A, Fanelli A. Prilocaine hydrochloride 2% hyperbaric solution for intrathecal injection: a clinical review. Local Reg Anesth. 2017 Mar 31;10:15-24. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S112756. eCollection 2017.
Reece AS. High-sensitivity CRP in opiate addiction: relative and age-dependent elevations. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2012 Jun;12(2):149-57. doi: 10.1007/s12012-012-9154-2.
Uher T, Bob P. Neuropathic pain, depressive symptoms, and C-reactive protein in sciatica patients. Int J Neurosci. 2013 Mar;123(3):204-8. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2012.746335.
Freda BJ, Tang WH, Van Lente F, Peacock WF, Francis GS. Cardiac troponins in renal insufficiency: review and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Dec 18;40(12):2065-71. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02608-6.
Kelley WE, Januzzi JL, Christenson RH. Increases of cardiac troponin in conditions other than acute coronary syndrome and heart failure. Clin Chem. 2009 Dec;55(12):2098-112. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.130799. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
Kula A, Bansal N. Applications of cardiac biomarkers in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2022 Nov 1;31(6):534-540. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000829. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
US National Institutes of Health, 2010. PRILOCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE injection, solution
National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2022. Prilocaine
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ANES/PR/001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id