Hyper Adduction of Right Radial Artery/Arm vs Left Drag Over Technique

NCT ID: NCT05833516

Last Updated: 2025-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

534 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-10

Study Completion Date

2024-02-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Several studies have shown that operator exposure via left transradial catheterization has yielded less operator exposure compared to standard right transradial procedure. However, in light of new data, the investigators hypothesize a hyperadducted right arm during right transradial cardiac catheterization will yield comparable, or the same operator radiation exposure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Few studies have examined operator's radiation exposure tor transradial cardiac catheterization between the left vs right radial artery approach. In light of recent studies (Schiabasi et al) demonstrating adduction of the right arm yields lower operator exposure than that of the right arm positioned away from the body to the operators. The investigators seek to examine if hyper adduction of the right arm yields similar operator exposure to that of the left radial approach.

Historically the left radial approach has been more favorable in terms of operator exposure. However, the primary access site for interventional cardiologists has been the right radial artery due to cardiac catheterization laboratories set up for operators to work on the right side of the table. This study seeks to find if a hyperadducted right arm yields less, more, or similar radiation exposure to the operator in cardiac catheterization laboratory than the left radial artery approach.

This study's primary outcome is to measure the radiation exposure to the primary operator during diagnostic cardiac catheterization at four different anatomical locations (these are Maimonides Medical Center employees -attending physicians in the catheterization lab). Study's secondary outcomes aim to measure Dose Area Product, mGy of radiation dose, \& contrast administration to the patients undergoing the procedure and presence/absence of subclavian artery tortuosity which are recorded automatically and regardless during the diagnostic procedure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radiation Exposure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hyperadducted Right Radial Arm (HARRA)

The primary operators will wear real time radiation dose monitoring at the left eye, right eye, thorax and abdomen level. At the end of each diagnostic procedure the cumulative radiation dose (measured in µSv) data at each level will be collected. The radiation dose exposure in patients randomized to hyperadducted right radial arm will be recorded for primary outcome.

Cardiac Catheterization

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The cardiac catheterization is an invasive procedure in which right or left radial artery of patient will be accessed to obtain cardiac angiogram. The study participants are both operators and patients by obtaining the amount of radiation they both were exposed in these two different arm techniques.

The patient will have to do nothing more than following the existing standard protocols which are followed nationwide. As, the radiation exposure to patients are already measured in the software itself. The operators however would be wearing radiation badges in 4 different anatomic locations to record radiation data for study.

Left Arm Drag over technique

The primary operators will wear real time radiation dose monitoring at the left eye, right eye, thorax and abdomen level. At the end of each diagnostic procedure the cumulative radiation dose (measured in µSv) data at each level will be collected. The radiation dose exposure in patients randomized to Left Arm drag over technique will be recorded for primary outcome.

Cardiac Catheterization

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The cardiac catheterization is an invasive procedure in which right or left radial artery of patient will be accessed to obtain cardiac angiogram. The study participants are both operators and patients by obtaining the amount of radiation they both were exposed in these two different arm techniques.

The patient will have to do nothing more than following the existing standard protocols which are followed nationwide. As, the radiation exposure to patients are already measured in the software itself. The operators however would be wearing radiation badges in 4 different anatomic locations to record radiation data for study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cardiac Catheterization

The cardiac catheterization is an invasive procedure in which right or left radial artery of patient will be accessed to obtain cardiac angiogram. The study participants are both operators and patients by obtaining the amount of radiation they both were exposed in these two different arm techniques.

The patient will have to do nothing more than following the existing standard protocols which are followed nationwide. As, the radiation exposure to patients are already measured in the software itself. The operators however would be wearing radiation badges in 4 different anatomic locations to record radiation data for study.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All the Cardiac catheterization laboratory physician operators who consent to participate in the study
* Patients of any sex and gender.
* Age \> 18 years old.
* Patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiogram from in-patient and out-patient settings

Exclusion Criteria

* History of prior CABG (Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery). CABG patients will be excluded due to inherent increased fluoroscopic time (finding grafts).
* Patients undergoing elective PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maimonides Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Maimonides Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sciahbasi A, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C, Sarandrea A, Summaria F, Pendenza G, Tommasino A, Patrizi R, Mazzari M, Mongiardo R, Lioy E. Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study. Am Heart J. 2011 Jan;161(1):172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21167351 (View on PubMed)

Dominici M, Diletti R, Milici C, Bock C, Placanica A, D'Alessandro G, Arrivi A, Italiani M, Buono E, Boschetti E. Operator exposure to x-ray in left and right radial access during percutaneous coronary procedures: OPERA randomised study. Heart. 2013 Apr;99(7):480-4. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302895. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23343690 (View on PubMed)

Kado H, Patel AM, Suryadevara S, Zenni MM, Box LC, Angiolillo DJ, Bass TA, Guzman LA. Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions: a randomized evaluation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul;7(7):810-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.026. Epub 2014 Jun 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24954573 (View on PubMed)

Sciahbasi A, Frigoli E, Sarandrea A, Calabro P, Rubartelli P, Cortese B, Tomassini F, Zavalloni D, Tebaldi M, Calabria P, Rigattieri S, Zingarelli A, Sardella G, Lupi A, Rothenbuhler M, Heg D, Valgimigli M. Determinants of radiation dose during right transradial access: Insights from the RAD-MATRIX study. Am Heart J. 2018 Feb;196:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29421003 (View on PubMed)

Sciahbasi A, Frigoli E, Sarandrea A, Rothenbuhler M, Calabro P, Lupi A, Tomassini F, Cortese B, Rigattieri S, Cerrato E, Zavalloni D, Zingarelli A, Calabria P, Rubartelli P, Sardella G, Tebaldi M, Windecker S, Juni P, Heg D, Valgimigli M. Radiation Exposure and Vascular Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes: The RAD-Matrix Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 23;69(20):2530-2537. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28330794 (View on PubMed)

De Rosa S, Torella D, Caiazzo G, Giampa S, Indolfi C. Left radial access for percutaneous coronary procedures: from neglected to performer? A meta-analysis of 14 studies including 7,603 procedures. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;171(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.11.046. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24331866 (View on PubMed)

Bull JP. Trauma audit. Arch Emerg Med. 1989 Dec;6(4):288-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.6.4.288-b. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2610809 (View on PubMed)

Pancholy SB, Joshi P, Shah S, Rao SV, Bertrand OF, Patel TM. Effect of Vascular Access Site Choice on Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: The REVERE Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1189-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.026. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26210808 (View on PubMed)

Fu Q, Hu H, Wang D, Chen W, Tan Z, Li Q, Chen B. Randomized comparative study of left versus right radial approach in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Jun 24;10:1003-8. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S81568. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26150704 (View on PubMed)

Casazza R, Malik B, Hashmi A, Fogel J, Montagna E, Frankel R, Borgen E, Ayzenberg S, Friedman M, Moskovits N, Verma S, Meng J, Chang N, Huang Y, Rodriguez C, Chera HH, Raj S, Chaterjee S, Gibson D, Palacios A, Agarwal C, Nene MV, Shani J. Operator Radiation Exposure Comparing the Left Radial Artery Approach and a Uniform Hyper-Adducted Right Radial Artery Approach: The HARRA Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr;18(4):e014602. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014602. Epub 2025 Mar 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40104858 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

#2022-05-19

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Radial Artery Access
NCT05768412 COMPLETED