Evaluation of the Effect of Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Dry Needling Therapy
NCT ID: NCT05821985
Last Updated: 2024-05-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-01
2024-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
On the other hand, dry needling' refers to the insertion of needles without the use of injectate. Dry needling is beneficial for treating a variety of neuromusculoskeletal pain syndromes as it represents a treatment modality for the ligaments and tendons, muscles, subcutaneous fascia, peripheral nerves, and neurovascular bundles. Deep dry needling (DDN) is a technique that utilizes the Intracapsular insertion of dry needles to approach the discal insertion to the lateral pterygoid muscle and the masseteric muscle origin, along the zygomatic bone and arch, aiming to inactivate the muscular trigger points (TPs).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dry Needling Vs Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Management of Myofascial Pain Dysfunction Syndrome
NCT06583915
Evaluation of Pain Regression in Patients With Myofascial Facial Pain Using Dextrose, Local Anaesthesia and Saline.
NCT03161210
Effectiveness of Dry Needling vs Manual Therapy in Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.
NCT04469088
Dry Needling and Functional Improvement
NCT02838394
Assessment of Concentric Needle Technique in Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Internal Derangement.
NCT05510336
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although the Magnetic resonance interpretation of the normal discal position defines the posterior discal band atop the highest convexity of the mandibular condyle, at a 12 o'clock position, this discal disposal is altered in almost 30% of the population without physical signs. Which rendered the treatment of the discal displacement mainly dependent on alleviating the signs and symptoms rather than restoring the anatomical disc position.
Various non-invasive therapeutic modalities are utilized for relieving the signs and symptoms of anterior discal displacement, including physical therapy, exercises, ischemic compression, heat therapy, acupuncture, dry needling, wet needling injections with different agents, and pharmacological treatments.
Among those, the trigger point injection is an effective modality, with or without the injection of saline or ringer's solutions, hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, botulinum toxin, platelet-rich plasma, or hypertonic dextrose The current study aims to design a randomized controlled trial that compares the effect of injecting 12.5 % of dextrose solution intraarticular and into the myofascial trigger points versus the dry needling of the same sites on alleviating the clinical signs and symptoms of (TMJ) disc displacement with reduction.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The Study group
The patients within the study group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point injection of a solution that contains (0.75 ml. 12.5% Dextrose solution, 0.75 ml. Saline solution, and 1.5 ml. Lidocaine).
The study group
The patients within the study group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point injection of a solution that contains (0.75 ml. 12.5% Dextrose solution, 0.75 ml. Saline solution, and 1.5 ml. Lidocaine). Each patient will receive four injections at two-week intervals, aided by a 25 gauge needle connected to a 3 ml. plastic syringe.
The Control group
Patients in the control group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point dry needle insertion without injecting any solution.
The Control group
The Control group:
Patients in the control group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point dry needle insertion without injecting any solution. Each patient will receive four dry needle insertions at two-week intervals, aided by a 25-gauge and 3.8 cm length needle.
i.e., All the patients will be subjected to intraarticular needle insertion. However, only the patients within the study group will be injected with the Dextrose Prolotherapy solution.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The study group
The patients within the study group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point injection of a solution that contains (0.75 ml. 12.5% Dextrose solution, 0.75 ml. Saline solution, and 1.5 ml. Lidocaine). Each patient will receive four injections at two-week intervals, aided by a 25 gauge needle connected to a 3 ml. plastic syringe.
The Control group
The Control group:
Patients in the control group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point dry needle insertion without injecting any solution. Each patient will receive four dry needle insertions at two-week intervals, aided by a 25-gauge and 3.8 cm length needle.
i.e., All the patients will be subjected to intraarticular needle insertion. However, only the patients within the study group will be injected with the Dextrose Prolotherapy solution.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Those patients with the radiographic interpretation of temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction (MRI) and the clinical signs of pain, limitation of mouth opening, and TMJ clicking.
3. The presence of associated myofascial pain with masseteric trigger points (TPs)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Any systemic disease affecting the temporomandibular joint's anatomy, mechanical function, or outcome of the proposed treatment.
3. Those Patients with a history of allergic reactions to any components of the injectable solution
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beni-Suef University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Nagi Alghandour
Lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beni-suef university
Banī Suwayf, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gibaly A, Abdelmoiz M, Alghandour AN. Evaluation of the effect of dextrose prolotherapy versus deep dry needling therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: (a randomized controlled trial). Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 8;28(9):475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05830-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.