Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effectiveness of Low Frequency Vibration on the Rate of Canine Retraction (NCT NCT05818527)
NCT ID: NCT05818527
Last Updated: 2023-08-01
Results Overview
. Retraction of the canine was done using NiTi coil spring delivering a force of 150 gm per side calibrated using digital force gauge, attached between the hook of the canine bracket and the first molar tube on a of 16\*2 stainless steel basal archwire. The intervention group subjects were given AcceleDent devices which delivered gentle micropulses (0.25 N at 30 Hz) and were instructed to wear them every day for 20 mins according to the manufacturer instructions. The patient compliance to intervention instructions were monitored by asking the patient and writing every day on chart how long she used it and compare this with the data download from the appliance that recorded their daily usage during the period of space closure. Follow-up visits were scheduled every four weeks. At each follow up visit, recalibration of the NiTi retraction spring was done using the same force gauge when necessary to maintain 150 gm force delivery. TADs stability and occlusal interferences during canine
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
6 month
2023-08-01
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Vibrating Device Arm
the patients will use vibrating device 20 mins per day
Acceledent vibrating device: used to accelerated the movement of teeth during orthodontic treatment
|
Control Group
control group using no devices
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effectiveness of Low Frequency Vibration on the Rate of Canine Retraction
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Vibrating Device Arm
n=16 Participants
the patients will use vibrating device 20 mins per day
Acceledent vibrating device: used to accelerated the movement of teeth during orthodontic treatment
|
Control Group
n=16 Participants
control group using no devices
|
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=5 Participants
|
17 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=7 Participants
|
19 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Egypt
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
canine retraction in millimeter
|
5.38 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
5.1 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=7 Participants
|
5.28 millimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthPopulation: 32 female patients requiring extraction of upper first premolar
. Retraction of the canine was done using NiTi coil spring delivering a force of 150 gm per side calibrated using digital force gauge, attached between the hook of the canine bracket and the first molar tube on a of 16\*2 stainless steel basal archwire. The intervention group subjects were given AcceleDent devices which delivered gentle micropulses (0.25 N at 30 Hz) and were instructed to wear them every day for 20 mins according to the manufacturer instructions. The patient compliance to intervention instructions were monitored by asking the patient and writing every day on chart how long she used it and compare this with the data download from the appliance that recorded their daily usage during the period of space closure. Follow-up visits were scheduled every four weeks. At each follow up visit, recalibration of the NiTi retraction spring was done using the same force gauge when necessary to maintain 150 gm force delivery. TADs stability and occlusal interferences during canine
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Vibrating Device Arm
n=16 Participants
the patients will use vibrating device 20 mins per day
Acceledent vibrating device: used to accelerated the movement of teeth during orthodontic treatment
|
Control Group
n=16 Participants
control group using no devices
|
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Canine Retraction in mm Per Month
|
5.38 millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
5.1 millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
Adverse Events
Vibrating Device Arm
Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
mohamed atfy abdelmotaleb ( PhD student )
Cairo university
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place