Efficacy and Safety of High-dose Liposomal Amphotericin B for Disseminated Histoplasmosis in AIDS

NCT ID: NCT05814432

Last Updated: 2025-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

279 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-16

Study Completion Date

2026-11-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Phase III trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a single high dose (10 mg/kg) of liposomal amphotericin B for disseminated histoplasmosis in AIDS patients, in comparison to standard therapy (3 mg/kg of liposomal amphotericin B for two weeks) (INDUCTION trial).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Histoplasmosis is a serious endemic mycosis that may disseminate in immunocompromised patients. The disease in endemic in the American continent, particularly Brazil. Patients with advanced HIV infection are susceptible to disseminated histoplasmosis, an AIDS-defining illness. According to international guidelines, induction therapy for disseminated histoplasmosis involves the use of liposomal amphotericin B for two weeks, but access to this medication is limited in several regions of the globe. A phase II trial showed promising results with the use of a single high dose of liposomal amphotericin B in this context. Here we propose a phase III study aimed to evaluate non-inferiority of induction therapy with liposomal amphotericin B for disseminated histoplasmosis in AIDS, comparing 10 mg/kg (interventional arm) versus 3 mg/kg for two weeks (standard therapy) regarding two-week mortality and superiority in a Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR). Induction therapy will be followed by oral itraconazole for one year for all patients. A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be established with the aim of defining whether the study needs to be stopped early for efficacy or harm to the study participants. The group will meet every 12 months to review the study data.

A steering committee made up of external members will advise and evaluate the study. Meetings will be held every 3 months. In addition, a medical committee made up of members of the study will be responsible for monitoring the progress of the study in order to maintain quality in all its aspects, with weekly meetings.

For data analysis, continuous variables will be described using mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum. Categorical variables will be described using absolute and relative frequencies. The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to describe overall survival. To assess the primary outcome, the proportions in each arm and the respective 90% confidence intervals will be evaluated. Continuous variables will be compared using two-sample t-tests, paired-sample t-tests, Mann-Whitney test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate and if necessary. Categorical variables will be compared with Fisher\'s exact test or chi-squared test, as appropriate. Ordinal DOOR analysis will be done with logistic regression to determine odds ratios.

To control the type I error rate for testing of the primary and major secondary endpoint, a hierarchical strategy will be used. Superiority assessments after successful testing of non-inferiority hypotheses will be performed. There is no multiplicity argument affecting this interpretation, as this approach corresponds to a simple closed testing procedure. The sample size calculation will consider the overall 2-week mortality in the L-AmB control observed in the phase II study (i.e. \~8%). The planned calculation is 279 patients (127 patients per study arm). The sample size is based on a power of 90% to detect a non-inferiority margin of 10% with a two-tailed p-alpha of 5% (i.e. one-sided confidence interval margin of 90%). An expectation of 10% of patients lost to follow-up is added, bringing the sample size to 279 patients (approximately 140 per arm). If the mortality observed in the study is higher than expected, a larger sample size will be necessary. The data will be analyzed using SPSS 27.0 software. If non-inferiority is achieved, the study will be tested for superiority using the DOOR scare. An a priori adaptive sample size is proposed to maintain statistical power if the assumption about two-week mortality is incorrect. A hierarchical testing strategy is proposed to test for superiority of key secondary endpoints of amphotericin-related laboratory toxicity and a DOOR scale. A sample size of 150 participants per arm in a parallel two-group design will be used to test whether distribution of DOOR scores differs between groups (H0: μ1 - μ2 = 0 versus H1: μ1 - μ2 ≠ 0). The comparison will be made using a two-sided, two-sample Mann-Whitney U test, with a Type I error rate α of 0.05. The common standard deviation for both groups is assumed to be 1.5, and the underlying data distribution is assumed to be normal. To detect a difference in means of 0.5 with 80% power, the number of needed subjects will be 300.

Financial support for this study was provided by the following institutions:

Gilead - donation of medication and financial support (USD 393,600); Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP/MCTI - Brazil) (USD 355,883.10); and IMMY: donation of diagnostic devices (50 boxes - HGM201, 51 boxes - CR2025);

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Disseminated Histoplasma Capsulatum Infection AIDS and Infections Immunosuppression Fungal Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Clinical assessments will take place at the start of the study (patient enrollment), day 3, day 7, day 14 (survival status) and week 10. During the study visits, some data and tests will be collected such as: maximum temperature, presence of dyspnea, respiratory rate, need for mechanical ventilation, systolic blood pressure, World Health Organization performance status, Karnofsky scale, Glasgow coma scale, biochemical laboratory tests, documentation of HIV infection, CD4 and CD8 counts, pregnancy test, urine test for Histoplasma antigen, blood sample for Histoplasma PCR. A 10-week visit will be carried out to also determine survival status, including whether or not there was a need for additional courses of amphotericin B, whether or not the patient had immune reconstitution syndrome, whether they had any serious adverse events, and finally, the DOOR score.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single high dose arm

Single high dose of liposomal amphotericin B (10 mg/kg)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Single high dose of liposomal amphotericin B

Intervention Type DRUG

Single high dose (10 mg/kg) of liposomal amphotericin B as induction therapy for disseminated histoplasmosis in AIDS

Standard dose arm

Standard treatment with 3 mg/kg of liposomal amphotericin B daily for 2 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

L-AmB standard dose

Intervention Type DRUG

Standard treatment (3 mg/kg for two weeks) with liposomal amphotericin B as induction therapy for disseminated histoplasmosis in AIDS

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single high dose of liposomal amphotericin B

Single high dose (10 mg/kg) of liposomal amphotericin B as induction therapy for disseminated histoplasmosis in AIDS

Intervention Type DRUG

L-AmB standard dose

Standard treatment (3 mg/kg for two weeks) with liposomal amphotericin B as induction therapy for disseminated histoplasmosis in AIDS

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

L-AmB single high dose investigational arm L-AmB conventional therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients admitted to the centers that will be part of the study
* Infected by the HIV, regardless of the use of antiretroviral therapy
* Patients diagnosed with disseminated histoplasmosis, confirmed by classical mycological methods (microscopy, culture or histopathology) or urinary Histoplasma antigen detection
* Patients with central nervous system (CNS) infection may be included if they have an alternative diagnosis suggestive of another CNS infection
* Patients using fluconazole for oroesophageal candidiasis may be included

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate in the trial
* Previous diagnosis of histoplasmosis
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Patients with renal failure at any given time (serum creatinine \> 2x or upper limit of normality (KDIGO, 2012)
* Previous severe reaction to a polyene antifungal
* Receipt of more than one dose of a polyene antifungal in the last 48 h
* Suspected histoplasmosis involving the central nervous system
* Patients who, in the judgment of the attending physician, have the prospect of death within the next 48 hours after selection, will also be excluded
* Patients with suspected histoplasmosis involving the central nervous system (CNS), as this condition requires high doses of amphotericin B
* Patients with the prospect of death in the next 48 hours after selection
* Patients with a concomitant diagnosis of cryptococcus will be excluded, as will patients with leishmaniasis in treatment or in secondary prophylaxis with amphotericin
* Patients without the capacity to administer enteral medication-at the discretion of the principal investigator of each center-considering that these patients will not be able to use itraconazole orally or through a feeding tube
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gilead Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sociedade Gaucha de Infectologia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Immuno-mycologics, Inc. (IMMY)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alessandro Pasqualotto

Medicine Professor, Head of Infectology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daiane F Dalla Lana, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Renata B Ascenco Soares, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

HDT - SES/GO

Luana C Genz Bazana, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Tarsila Vieceli, MD MSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital de Doenças Tropicais

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Giselda Trigueiro

Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Geral de Roraima

Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alessandro C Pasqualotto, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

+5551999951614

Diego R Falci, MD PhD

Role: CONTACT

+5551997507835

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Cássia Godoy

Role: primary

+5562996873001

Monica Bay

Role: primary

+5584994141921

Alessandro C. Pasqualotto, MD PhD

Role: primary

51999951614

Diego R Falci

Role: primary

+5551997507835

Luis E Galan

Role: primary

+5595981218209

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pasqualotto AC, Lana DD, Godoy CSM, Leitao TDMJS, Bay MB, Damasceno LS, Soares RBA, Kist R, Silva LR, Wiltgen D, Melo M, Guimaraes TF, Guimaraes MR, Vechi HT, de Mesquita JRL, Monteiro GRG, Adenis A, Bahr NC, Spec A, Boulware DR, Israelski D, Chiller T, Falci DR. Single High Dose of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Human Immunodeficiency Virus/AIDS-Related Disseminated Histoplasmosis: A Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Oct 13;77(8):1126-1132. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad313.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37232940 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

67938323.0.1001.5345

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.