Impact of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Strategy After Surgery of Skin Carcinomas in Older Patients
NCT ID: NCT05794035
Last Updated: 2023-11-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
303 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-17
2028-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) is often discussed regarding the risk of local recurrence. Despite the lack of high level evidence, ART is indicated in patients according to unfavorable prognostic factors. ART benefit is generally questioned in regard to the potential degradation of the patient's quality of life (QoL). Currently there is no prospective trial or recommendations that take into account geriatric patients' evaluation and profiles during the management of NMSC. In addition, there is no data that could help to define the subgroup of elderly patients who will benefit from ART in tumors with unfavorable prognostic factors.
In terms of ART, multiple fractionation schedules are available, ranging from standard fractionation (45-60Gy in 5-6 weeks) to the extreme hypofractionation (HF) delivering 16-18Gy in one fraction.
In routine practice, HF is mainly preferred in elderly patients for more convenience by reducing the number of transports and increase health related quality of life (HRQoL). However, there is no data on the fragility profiles of these patients, nor validating any HF schedule in terms of efficacy, acute toxicity, cosmetic results, and impact on HRQoL.
the main ain objective is to evaluate the comparative efficacy of two modalities of Radiotherapy over surgery alone on local tumor control in older patients with Non Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) In current practice, adjuvant radiotherapy is discussed regarding the risk of local recurrence as determined by the existence (or not) of unfavorable prognostic factors. The proposed study will include R0-high risk of CBC and CEC of the skin in elderly patients. There is no risk regarding the design of the trial as the last will respond to two important unknown questions regarding the utility of RT and its fractionation in this population. Moreover, it is an excellent opportunity to collect prospectively geriatric evaluation and HRQoL data that are lacking in the literature for skin cancers. No constraints are seen neither in the design, nor in the potential recruitments.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Intro:
Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) incidence as well as morbidity rates are high in older patients. Surgery is the standard of care. About 5 to 10% of NMSC present high-risk clinico-pathologic features that can increase risk of local recurrence (LR).
Adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) is often discussed regarding the risk of local recurrence. Despite the lack of high level evidence, ART is indicated in patients according to unfavorable prognostic factors. ART benefit is generally questioned in regard to the potential degradation of the patient's quality of life (QoL). Currently there is no prospective trial or recommendations that take into account geriatric patients' evaluation and profiles during the management of NMSC. In addition, there is no data that could help to define the subgroup of elderly patients who will benefit from ART in tumors with unfavorable prognostic factors.
In terms of ART, multiple fractionation schedules are available, ranging from standard fractionation (45-60Gy in 5-6 weeks) to the extreme hypofractionation (HF) delivering 16-18Gy in one fraction.
In routine practice, HF is mainly preferred in elderly patients for more convenience by reducing the number of transports and increase health related quality of life (HRQoL). However, there is no data on the fragility profiles of these patients, nor validating any HF schedule in terms of efficacy, acute toxicity, cosmetic results, and impact on HRQoL.
Hypothesis/Objective
Main Objective:
To evaluate the comparative efficacy of two modalities of Radiotherapy over surgery alone on local tumor control in older patients with Non Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) In current practice, adjuvant radiotherapy is discussed regarding the risk of local recurrence as determined by the existence (or not) of unfavorable prognostic factors. The proposed study will include R0-high risk of CBC and CEC of the skin in elderly patients. There is no risk regarding the design of the trial as the last will respond to two important unknown questions regarding the utility of RT and its fractionation in this population. Moreover, it is an excellent opportunity to collect prospectively geriatric evaluation and HRQoL data that are lacking in the literature for skin cancers. No constraints are seen neither in the design, nor in the potential recruitments.
Primary endpoint:
Local tumor control at 3-year follow-up in a time-to-event analysis Method This is a multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, comparative 3 arms phase III trial.
After inclusion of patient aged ≥ 70 years with performance status OMS 0-3 who had completed surgery (R0) for SCC and BCC with at least one unfavorable prognostic factor, all patientsst will have G8 score and a Geriatric Core Data Set (G CODE) evaluation. Performance of a complete oncogeriatric evaluation and its modalities will be left to the discretion of the investigator.
The patients will be randomized in 3 arms with stratification by center, time from surgery to wound healing and perineural invasion.
* Arm A: Surgery alone
* Arm B: Surgery + Moderate HF 45Gy in 15 fractions, 3 fractions per week over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
* Arm C: Surgery + Extreme HF : 30Gy in 5 fractions of 6Gy, 1 fraction per week, over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* Arm A: Surgery alone
* Arm B: Surgery + Moderate HF 45Gy in 15 fractions, 3 fractions per week over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
* Arm C: Surgery + Extreme HF : 30Gy in 5 fractions of 6Gy, 1 fraction per week, over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Surgery alone
After inclusion of patient aged ≥ 70 years with performance status OMS 0-3 who had completed surgery (R0) for SCC and BCC with at least one unfavorable prognostic factor, patient will have surgery alone with no hypo fractionation treatment
Surgery alone, without radiation post surgery
Arm A: Surgery alone followed by surveillance
Surgery + Moderate hypo fractionation (HF)
Surgery + Moderate hypo fractionation (HF) 45Gy in 15 fractions, 3 fractions per week over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
Surgery with additional moderate hypofractionation RT (15 fractions)
After randomization, patients will then be followed-up at 3 months post randomization and at each surveillance visit (M6, M12, M24 and M36).
Adjuvant Radiotherapy:
-Arm B: Surgery followed by moderate hypofractionation RT (15 fractions): 45Gy in 15 fractions, 3 fractions per week over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
Surgery + Extreme hypo fractionation (HF)
Surgery + Extreme hypo fractionation (HF): 30Gy in 5 fractions of 6Gy, 1 fraction per week, over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
Surgery with extreme hypo fractionation treatment (HF)
After randomization, patients will then be followed-up at 3 months post randomization and at each surveillance visit (M6, M12, M24 and M36).
Adjuvant Radiotherapy:
-Arm C= Surgery followed by extreme hypofractionation RT (5 fractions, 2 fractions/week): 30Gy in 5 fractions of 6Gy over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Surgery with additional moderate hypofractionation RT (15 fractions)
After randomization, patients will then be followed-up at 3 months post randomization and at each surveillance visit (M6, M12, M24 and M36).
Adjuvant Radiotherapy:
-Arm B: Surgery followed by moderate hypofractionation RT (15 fractions): 45Gy in 15 fractions, 3 fractions per week over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
Surgery alone, without radiation post surgery
Arm A: Surgery alone followed by surveillance
Surgery with extreme hypo fractionation treatment (HF)
After randomization, patients will then be followed-up at 3 months post randomization and at each surveillance visit (M6, M12, M24 and M36).
Adjuvant Radiotherapy:
-Arm C= Surgery followed by extreme hypofractionation RT (5 fractions, 2 fractions/week): 30Gy in 5 fractions of 6Gy over 5 weeks to the operative bed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* OMS 0-3
* Pathology confirmation of invasive SCC or BCC
* At least one of high-risk factors for recurrence (R0 but close margins, location/size, microscopic perineural invasion, recurrent primary disease, immunosuppression, thickness including Breslow and Clark level, poorly-moderately differentiated)
* No indication of regional nodal RT
* No prior RT to the treated site
* Written consent from patient or his/her legal representative, trustworthy person or family member if the person is physically unable to give his or her written consent
* Life expectancy ≥ 6 months, as clinically estimated by the investigator in charge of enrolment
* No contraindication for surgery and RT after multidisciplinary board meeting evaluation
* Affiliated to a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with severe dementia not allowing follow-up
* Any psychological, familial, sociological, geographical or logistical reasons that would prevent participation to surveillance during treatment and follow-up
* Other active cancers in treatment
* Participation in another interventional study (therapeutic trial interfering with the study's endpoints)
* Patient on AME (state medical aid)
* Persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Henri Mondor
Créteil, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP180682
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id