Hysteroscopy vs. Endouterine Aspiration in the Management of Trophoblastic Retention
NCT ID: NCT05789940
Last Updated: 2025-01-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
220 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-18
2029-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim: The main objective is to compare the efficacy of management by endo-uterine aspiration vs. management by hysteroscopy of trophoblastic retention after early miscarriage, at 6 weeks after surgery, by endovaginal ultrasound.
Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arms, parallel therapeutic clinical trial comparing hysteroscopy versus endouterine aspiration for the management of trophoblastic retention after spontaneous miscarriage.
Patients will be randomized (110 per arm) after verification of eligibility criteria and signature of consent, on the day of the operation:
* Arm A: 110 patients treated by operative hysteroscopy
* Arm B: 110 patients treated by endo-uterine aspiration
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hyaluronic Acid and Uterine Synechiae
NCT02248376
Hysteroscopic Resection Versus Manual Vacuum Aspiration for Early Pregnancy
NCT07088510
Investigation of Embryoscopy in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
NCT00589446
Evaluation of the Non-inferiority of Resorbable Gelatin Embolization Compared to Embolization Combined With Endometrial Aspiration for the Management of Hemorrhagic Uterine Vascular Abnormalities Following Premature Termination of Pregnancy
NCT07206342
Diagnosis and Management of Enhanced Myometrial Vascularity Associated With Retained Products of Conception
NCT04176679
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: The main objective is to compare the efficacy of management by endo-uterine aspiration versus management by hysteroscopy of trophoblastic retention after early miscarriage, at 6 weeks after surgery, by endovaginal ultrasound.
The secondary objectives are:
* the comparison of the rate of complications of the two techniques, during and after surgery
* the comparison of the rate of recourse to a second line surgical management between the two arms,
* the comparison of the rate of synechiae diagnosed by hysterosonography between the two techniques at 6 weeks after surgery,
* the comparison of the time to conception in the two arms during the 2 years after surgery
* the comparison of the fertility rate at 2 years after surgery in the two arms.
Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arms, parallel therapeutic clinical trial comparing hysteroscopy versus endouterine aspiration for the management of trophoblastic retention after spontaneous miscarriage.
Patients will be randomized (110 per arm) after verification of eligibility criteria and signature of consent, on the day of the operation:
* Arm A: 110 patients treated by operative hysteroscopy
* Arm B: 110 patients treated by endo-uterine aspiration Randomization will be stratified by center, age (\<35 years, 35 years and over), size of trophoblastic retention (\<30mm, 30mm and over) and scheduled by random size block. It will be centralized (Ennov-clinical software) and parameterized by the Unité́ de Recherche Clinique \& Biostatistiques of the Montpellier University Hospital.
Statistics: The effectiveness of operative hysteroscopy is expected to be 100%, and that of aspiration 90%. To show this difference with an alpha risk of 5%, and with a power of 90%, 98 patients per arm will have to be analysed (exact binomial distribution calculation, epiR package of R implemented in biostatgv). To take into account a 10% loss of sight rate, 220 patients will be recruted.
Patients will be included in the study on the morning of the procedure, after verification of the selection criteria.
The expected number of lost to follow-up is estimated at 10%; in fact, the main criterion is evaluated relatively early (6 weeks), in patients having a desire for pregnancy and therefore relatively compliant, the rate of lost to follow-up will be a fairly low.
A flow-chart will be constructed to describe the evolution of the populations during the study. It will detail the causes of non-inclusion and the causes of loss to follow-up.
All study data will be described according to the randomization arm, in the randomized population: mean, standard deviation, median and quartiles, extrema and number of missing data for quantitative variables, numbers and percentages of each modality for qualitative data.
The clinical comparability of the randomized population and the ITT population for the primary endpoint will be assessed.
Primary analysis:
The uterine vacuity rate will be compared between the two arms in the ITT population for the primary endpoint by a Chi-square test or by a Fisher exact test if the conditions for Chi-square validity are not met. The significance level was set at 5%, two-sided.
Secondary endpoint analysis:
The rates of complications, use of second-line surgical management, synechiae, and fertility at 2 years after surgery will be compared between the two arms in their respective ITT populations, by a Chi-square test or by a Fisher's exact test if the conditions for the validity of Chi-square are not met.
The time to conception will be compared between the two arms of the randomized population by a log-rank test.
Within this family of endpoints, the alpha risk will be controlled by a Hochberg procedure.
Visit 1: Pre-operative consultation between 1 and 21 days before the operation
* Clinical examination performed as part of routine care: measurement of blood pressure and pulse, temperature, speculum examination to ensure the absence of significant bleeding indicating emergency surgical management.
* Diagnosis of trophoblastic retention by endovaginal ultrasound
At the end of the consultation:
* Verification of eligibility criteria
* Oral information on the study and information leaflet given to the patient
* Collection of informed and written consent after a reflection period
* Collection of the following data:
* Demographic data
* History, smoking habits and concomitant treatments
* Pregnancy data leading to the current miscarriage
* Results of pelvic ultrasound
Intervention (D0):
* Verification of eligibility criteria and randomization on the morning of the procedure
* Surgical management of trophoblastic retention by operative hysteroscopy (Arm A) or endo-uterine aspiration (Arm B)
* Collection of adverse events during the operation and before the patient is discharged
Visit 2: Consultation at 6 weeks after surgery +/- 7 days
This consultation will be performed by an investigator trained in pelvic ultrasound and hysterosonography, blinded to the allocated procedure:
* Plasma HCG measurement before hysterosonography to ensure that there is no current pregnancy
* Endovaginal ultrasound to check uterine vacuity
* Hysterosonography for the diagnosis of uterine synechia
* Collection of complications and adverse events after surgery
Visit 3: Telephone consultation at 6 months +/- 15 days after surgery
Carried out by the clinical research associate (CRA):
* Evaluation of fertility by questionnaire
* Evaluation of the time to conception if pregnancy in progress A letter will be sent to the patient if she cannot be reached by phone (questionnaire + return envelope)
Visit 4: Telephone consultation at 12 months +/- 1 month after surgery
Carried out by the CRA:
* Evaluation of fertility by questionnaire.
* Evaluation of the time to conception if pregnancy in progress. A letter will be sent to the patient if she cannot be reached by phone (questionnaire + return envelope)
Visit 5: Telephone consultation at 24 months (+/- 2 months) after surgery
Carried out by the CRA:
* Evaluation of fertility by questionnaire
* Evaluation of the time to conception if pregnancy in progress A letter will be sent to the patient if she cannot be reached by phone (questionnaire + return envelope). The patients will be followed until a pregnancy is obtained with a term greater than or equal to 24 weeks of amenorrhea or over a maximum period of 26 months after the surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A: Hysteroscopy
Patients randomized to the hysteroscopy arm will receive misoprostol antibiotic prophylaxis to dilate the cervix before surgery, and anti-adhesion barrier gels will be used, according to routine procedures at each center. In case of intrauterine retention complicated by endometritis, antibiotic treatment for 48 hours (penicillin, metronidazole, fluoroquinolones or a combination of these antibiotics) will be administered according to the standard practice of each center. Evacuated retention product will be sent for pathological examination. Rh-negative women will receive prophylaxis to prevent Rh alloimmunization.
hysteroscopy
The procedure is performed by a gynecologic surgeon under general or spinal anesthesia, depending on the standard practice of the center involved, with the patient in the gynecologic position. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be administered according to the standard practice of the center. The equipment available at each center will be used for operative hysteroscopy. The use of energy is usually unnecessary and saline will be preferred. Before the operation, the appearance of the uterine cavity will be described. The selected design product will be resected from top to bottom using the surgical resector, without electrical energy, as this method is known to be the most protective of the endometrium in previous studies. Electric current should be used only as a last resort, in cases where the selected design cannot be removed without it. If there is active bleeding after the procedure, elective coagulation via the hysteroscope may be performed to stop intrauterine bleeding.
Arm B: Aspiration
Patients randomized to the aspiration arm will receive misoprostol antibiotic prophylaxis to dilate the cervix before surgery and anti-adhesion barrier gels will be used, according to routine procedures at each center. In case of intrauterine retention complicated by endometritis, antibiotic treatment for 48 hours (penicillin, metronidazole, fluoroquinolones or a combination of these antibiotics) will be administered according to the standard practice of each center. Evacuated retention product will be sent for pathological examination. Rh-negative women will receive prophylaxis to prevent Rh alloimmunization.
Aspiration
The aspiration will be performed by a gynecological surgeon, according to the center's standard protocol. A flexible or rigid cannula can be used. Antibiotic prophylaxis, the diameter of the cannula used, the cervical preparation required, and the use of intraoperative ultrasound guidance will be left to the discretion of the operator and the standard practice of the center. In most centers, the cervix is dilated with a Hegar dilator of up to 9 mm in size.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
hysteroscopy
The procedure is performed by a gynecologic surgeon under general or spinal anesthesia, depending on the standard practice of the center involved, with the patient in the gynecologic position. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be administered according to the standard practice of the center. The equipment available at each center will be used for operative hysteroscopy. The use of energy is usually unnecessary and saline will be preferred. Before the operation, the appearance of the uterine cavity will be described. The selected design product will be resected from top to bottom using the surgical resector, without electrical energy, as this method is known to be the most protective of the endometrium in previous studies. Electric current should be used only as a last resort, in cases where the selected design cannot be removed without it. If there is active bleeding after the procedure, elective coagulation via the hysteroscope may be performed to stop intrauterine bleeding.
Aspiration
The aspiration will be performed by a gynecological surgeon, according to the center's standard protocol. A flexible or rigid cannula can be used. Antibiotic prophylaxis, the diameter of the cannula used, the cervical preparation required, and the use of intraoperative ultrasound guidance will be left to the discretion of the operator and the standard practice of the center. In most centers, the cervix is dilated with a Hegar dilator of up to 9 mm in size.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of intrauterine trophoblastic retention by endovaginal pelvic ultrasound
* Shared decision for surgical management
* Current pregnancy desire
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient who has received surgical treatment for current intrauterine retention
* Trophoblastic retention after elective termination, late miscarriage and postpartum
* Patient with an intrauterine device (IUD)
* Pregnancy obtained by medically assisted procreation
* Indication for emergency surgical management for haemostatic purposes
* Failure to obtain free, informed and written consent after a period of reflection
* Person not affiliated or beneficiary of a national health insurance system
* Person protected by law, under guardianship or curatorship
* Person participating in other interventional research involving the human person
18 Years
42 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Montpellier
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Martha DURAES, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
CHU de Montpellier
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin
Bordeaux, , France
CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, , France
CHU de Nice - Hôpital Archet II
Nice, , France
CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Carémeau
Nîmes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RECHMPL22_0397
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.