Hysteroscopy vs. Endouterine Aspiration in the Management of Trophoblastic Retention

NCT ID: NCT05789940

Last Updated: 2025-01-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

220 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-18

Study Completion Date

2029-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction: Incomplete early miscarriage is defined as early miscarriage with persistent intrauterine material on ultrasound. Intrauterine retention of trophoblastic debris is not an uncommon phenomenon. These retentions may initially be asymptomatic but are often responsible for persistent metrorrhagia and endometritis. This symptomatology often accentuates the psychological distress of patients mourning the pregnancy. Incomplete miscarriages are mainly managed by the gynecological emergency department. The recommendations of the Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) suggest as a first line of treatment: either surgical management or expectant care. The choice between the two is left to the discretion of the doctor and the patient. there are no clear recommendations as to the choice between hysteroscopy and aspiration. Within the teams, the choice is often made according to the habits and protocols of the service, according to the equipment available and the skills of the gynaecologists.

Aim: The main objective is to compare the efficacy of management by endo-uterine aspiration vs. management by hysteroscopy of trophoblastic retention after early miscarriage, at 6 weeks after surgery, by endovaginal ultrasound.

Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arms, parallel therapeutic clinical trial comparing hysteroscopy versus endouterine aspiration for the management of trophoblastic retention after spontaneous miscarriage.

Patients will be randomized (110 per arm) after verification of eligibility criteria and signature of consent, on the day of the operation:

* Arm A: 110 patients treated by operative hysteroscopy
* Arm B: 110 patients treated by endo-uterine aspiration

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction: Incomplete early miscarriage is defined as early miscarriage with persistent intrauterine material on ultrasound. Intrauterine retention of trophoblastic debris is not an uncommon phenomenon. These retentions may initially be asymptomatic but are often responsible for persistent metrorrhagia and endometritis. This symptomatology often accentuates the psychological distress of patients mourning the pregnancy. Incomplete miscarriages are mainly managed by the gynecological emergency department. The recommendations of the Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) suggest as a first line of treatment: either surgical management or expectant care. The choice between the two is left to the discretion of the doctor and the patient. there are no clear recommendations as to the choice between hysteroscopy and aspiration. Within the teams, the choice is often made according to the habits and protocols of the service, according to the equipment available and the skills of the gynaecologists.

Aim: The main objective is to compare the efficacy of management by endo-uterine aspiration versus management by hysteroscopy of trophoblastic retention after early miscarriage, at 6 weeks after surgery, by endovaginal ultrasound.

The secondary objectives are:

* the comparison of the rate of complications of the two techniques, during and after surgery
* the comparison of the rate of recourse to a second line surgical management between the two arms,
* the comparison of the rate of synechiae diagnosed by hysterosonography between the two techniques at 6 weeks after surgery,
* the comparison of the time to conception in the two arms during the 2 years after surgery
* the comparison of the fertility rate at 2 years after surgery in the two arms.

Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, two-arms, parallel therapeutic clinical trial comparing hysteroscopy versus endouterine aspiration for the management of trophoblastic retention after spontaneous miscarriage.

Patients will be randomized (110 per arm) after verification of eligibility criteria and signature of consent, on the day of the operation:

* Arm A: 110 patients treated by operative hysteroscopy
* Arm B: 110 patients treated by endo-uterine aspiration Randomization will be stratified by center, age (\<35 years, 35 years and over), size of trophoblastic retention (\<30mm, 30mm and over) and scheduled by random size block. It will be centralized (Ennov-clinical software) and parameterized by the Unité́ de Recherche Clinique \& Biostatistiques of the Montpellier University Hospital.

Statistics: The effectiveness of operative hysteroscopy is expected to be 100%, and that of aspiration 90%. To show this difference with an alpha risk of 5%, and with a power of 90%, 98 patients per arm will have to be analysed (exact binomial distribution calculation, epiR package of R implemented in biostatgv). To take into account a 10% loss of sight rate, 220 patients will be recruted.

Patients will be included in the study on the morning of the procedure, after verification of the selection criteria.

The expected number of lost to follow-up is estimated at 10%; in fact, the main criterion is evaluated relatively early (6 weeks), in patients having a desire for pregnancy and therefore relatively compliant, the rate of lost to follow-up will be a fairly low.

A flow-chart will be constructed to describe the evolution of the populations during the study. It will detail the causes of non-inclusion and the causes of loss to follow-up.

All study data will be described according to the randomization arm, in the randomized population: mean, standard deviation, median and quartiles, extrema and number of missing data for quantitative variables, numbers and percentages of each modality for qualitative data.

The clinical comparability of the randomized population and the ITT population for the primary endpoint will be assessed.

Primary analysis:

The uterine vacuity rate will be compared between the two arms in the ITT population for the primary endpoint by a Chi-square test or by a Fisher exact test if the conditions for Chi-square validity are not met. The significance level was set at 5%, two-sided.

Secondary endpoint analysis:

The rates of complications, use of second-line surgical management, synechiae, and fertility at 2 years after surgery will be compared between the two arms in their respective ITT populations, by a Chi-square test or by a Fisher's exact test if the conditions for the validity of Chi-square are not met.

The time to conception will be compared between the two arms of the randomized population by a log-rank test.

Within this family of endpoints, the alpha risk will be controlled by a Hochberg procedure.

Visit 1: Pre-operative consultation between 1 and 21 days before the operation

* Clinical examination performed as part of routine care: measurement of blood pressure and pulse, temperature, speculum examination to ensure the absence of significant bleeding indicating emergency surgical management.
* Diagnosis of trophoblastic retention by endovaginal ultrasound

At the end of the consultation:

* Verification of eligibility criteria
* Oral information on the study and information leaflet given to the patient
* Collection of informed and written consent after a reflection period
* Collection of the following data:
* Demographic data
* History, smoking habits and concomitant treatments
* Pregnancy data leading to the current miscarriage
* Results of pelvic ultrasound

Intervention (D0):

* Verification of eligibility criteria and randomization on the morning of the procedure
* Surgical management of trophoblastic retention by operative hysteroscopy (Arm A) or endo-uterine aspiration (Arm B)
* Collection of adverse events during the operation and before the patient is discharged

Visit 2: Consultation at 6 weeks after surgery +/- 7 days

This consultation will be performed by an investigator trained in pelvic ultrasound and hysterosonography, blinded to the allocated procedure:

* Plasma HCG measurement before hysterosonography to ensure that there is no current pregnancy
* Endovaginal ultrasound to check uterine vacuity
* Hysterosonography for the diagnosis of uterine synechia
* Collection of complications and adverse events after surgery

Visit 3: Telephone consultation at 6 months +/- 15 days after surgery

Carried out by the clinical research associate (CRA):

* Evaluation of fertility by questionnaire
* Evaluation of the time to conception if pregnancy in progress A letter will be sent to the patient if she cannot be reached by phone (questionnaire + return envelope)

Visit 4: Telephone consultation at 12 months +/- 1 month after surgery

Carried out by the CRA:

* Evaluation of fertility by questionnaire.
* Evaluation of the time to conception if pregnancy in progress. A letter will be sent to the patient if she cannot be reached by phone (questionnaire + return envelope)

Visit 5: Telephone consultation at 24 months (+/- 2 months) after surgery

Carried out by the CRA:

* Evaluation of fertility by questionnaire
* Evaluation of the time to conception if pregnancy in progress A letter will be sent to the patient if she cannot be reached by phone (questionnaire + return envelope). The patients will be followed until a pregnancy is obtained with a term greater than or equal to 24 weeks of amenorrhea or over a maximum period of 26 months after the surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Miscarriage

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: Hysteroscopy

Patients randomized to the hysteroscopy arm will receive misoprostol antibiotic prophylaxis to dilate the cervix before surgery, and anti-adhesion barrier gels will be used, according to routine procedures at each center. In case of intrauterine retention complicated by endometritis, antibiotic treatment for 48 hours (penicillin, metronidazole, fluoroquinolones or a combination of these antibiotics) will be administered according to the standard practice of each center. Evacuated retention product will be sent for pathological examination. Rh-negative women will receive prophylaxis to prevent Rh alloimmunization.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

hysteroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedure is performed by a gynecologic surgeon under general or spinal anesthesia, depending on the standard practice of the center involved, with the patient in the gynecologic position. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be administered according to the standard practice of the center. The equipment available at each center will be used for operative hysteroscopy. The use of energy is usually unnecessary and saline will be preferred. Before the operation, the appearance of the uterine cavity will be described. The selected design product will be resected from top to bottom using the surgical resector, without electrical energy, as this method is known to be the most protective of the endometrium in previous studies. Electric current should be used only as a last resort, in cases where the selected design cannot be removed without it. If there is active bleeding after the procedure, elective coagulation via the hysteroscope may be performed to stop intrauterine bleeding.

Arm B: Aspiration

Patients randomized to the aspiration arm will receive misoprostol antibiotic prophylaxis to dilate the cervix before surgery and anti-adhesion barrier gels will be used, according to routine procedures at each center. In case of intrauterine retention complicated by endometritis, antibiotic treatment for 48 hours (penicillin, metronidazole, fluoroquinolones or a combination of these antibiotics) will be administered according to the standard practice of each center. Evacuated retention product will be sent for pathological examination. Rh-negative women will receive prophylaxis to prevent Rh alloimmunization.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aspiration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The aspiration will be performed by a gynecological surgeon, according to the center's standard protocol. A flexible or rigid cannula can be used. Antibiotic prophylaxis, the diameter of the cannula used, the cervical preparation required, and the use of intraoperative ultrasound guidance will be left to the discretion of the operator and the standard practice of the center. In most centers, the cervix is dilated with a Hegar dilator of up to 9 mm in size.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

hysteroscopy

The procedure is performed by a gynecologic surgeon under general or spinal anesthesia, depending on the standard practice of the center involved, with the patient in the gynecologic position. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be administered according to the standard practice of the center. The equipment available at each center will be used for operative hysteroscopy. The use of energy is usually unnecessary and saline will be preferred. Before the operation, the appearance of the uterine cavity will be described. The selected design product will be resected from top to bottom using the surgical resector, without electrical energy, as this method is known to be the most protective of the endometrium in previous studies. Electric current should be used only as a last resort, in cases where the selected design cannot be removed without it. If there is active bleeding after the procedure, elective coagulation via the hysteroscope may be performed to stop intrauterine bleeding.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Aspiration

The aspiration will be performed by a gynecological surgeon, according to the center's standard protocol. A flexible or rigid cannula can be used. Antibiotic prophylaxis, the diameter of the cannula used, the cervical preparation required, and the use of intraoperative ultrasound guidance will be left to the discretion of the operator and the standard practice of the center. In most centers, the cervix is dilated with a Hegar dilator of up to 9 mm in size.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Management for trophoblastic retention after early spontaneous miscarriage (\<14 weeks of amenorrhea)
* Diagnosis of intrauterine trophoblastic retention by endovaginal pelvic ultrasound
* Shared decision for surgical management
* Current pregnancy desire

Exclusion Criteria

* Known uterine malformation
* Patient who has received surgical treatment for current intrauterine retention
* Trophoblastic retention after elective termination, late miscarriage and postpartum
* Patient with an intrauterine device (IUD)
* Pregnancy obtained by medically assisted procreation
* Indication for emergency surgical management for haemostatic purposes
* Failure to obtain free, informed and written consent after a period of reflection
* Person not affiliated or beneficiary of a national health insurance system
* Person protected by law, under guardianship or curatorship
* Person participating in other interventional research involving the human person
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

42 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Martha DURAES, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

CHU de Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Bordeaux - Hôpital Pellegrin

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve

Montpellier, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

CHU de Nice - Hôpital Archet II

Nice, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Carémeau

Nîmes, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Martha DURAES, MD

Role: CONTACT

+334 67 33 65 32

Elodie GUIBERT, CRA

Role: CONTACT

+334 67 33 53 17

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Loïc SENTILHES, MD PhD

Role: primary

Martha DURAES, MD

Role: primary

+334 67 33 65 32

Elodie GUIBERT, CRA

Role: backup

+334 67 33 53 17

Jérôme DELOTTE, MD PhD

Role: primary

Renaud DE TAYRAC, MD PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL22_0397

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sim (Scratch in Miscarriage) Study
NCT02681627 COMPLETED NA