Improving Utilization of Supplemental Breast MRI Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breasts
NCT ID: NCT05787249
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1358 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-04
2025-04-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Abbreviate or FAST Breast MRI for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening for Black Women at Average Risk and Dense Breasts
NCT04854304
Breast Density and the Role of Preoperative Mammography, Ultrasound, Elastography and MRI
NCT00695968
Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy by the Use of Breast Proton MR Spectroscopy
NCT00580086
Abbreviated Breast MRI and Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography in Screening Women With Dense Breasts
NCT02933489
Assessing Breast Density's Value in Imaging - A Comparative Effectiveness Study
NCT02980848
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual care (no nudge)
Usual standard of care, no nudging.
No interventions assigned to this group
Provider nudge only
Nudge sent to provider through EHR.
Provider nudge
Nudge directed to the provider with the aim of increasing ordering of MRI in patients with extremely dense breasts
Patient nudge only
Nudge sent to the patient through text messaging.
Patient nudge
Nudge directed to the patient with the aim of increasing the uptake of MRI in patients with extremely dense breasts
Patient and provider nudge
Nudge sent to both provider through EHR, and to patient through text messaging.
Patient nudge
Nudge directed to the patient with the aim of increasing the uptake of MRI in patients with extremely dense breasts
Provider nudge
Nudge directed to the provider with the aim of increasing ordering of MRI in patients with extremely dense breasts
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient nudge
Nudge directed to the patient with the aim of increasing the uptake of MRI in patients with extremely dense breasts
Provider nudge
Nudge directed to the provider with the aim of increasing ordering of MRI in patients with extremely dense breasts
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Recent non-actionable mammogram of less than 6 months
* Mammogram performed at Penn Center for Advanced Medicine, Penn Presbyterian Hospital, Pennsylvania Hospital, or Radnor
* Valid mobile phone number
* Provider needs to have ordered the initial screening mammogram
* Employed by Penn Health System and access to Penn Chart
Exclusion Criteria
* No breast MRI within the past 2 years
* No prior actionable mammogram within 6 months
* No recent or concurrent ultrasound
Provider participants:
40 Years
74 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anne Marie McCarthy, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pennsylvania
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Pennsylvania
Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, Santos Silva ID, McCormack V, Baglietto L, Vachon C, Bakker MF, Giles GG, Chia KS, Czene K, Eriksson L, Hall P, Hartman M, Warren RM, Hislop G, Chiarelli AM, Hopper JL, Krishnan K, Li J, Li Q, Pagano I, Rosner BA, Wong CS, Scott C, Stone J, Maskarinec G, Boyd NF, van Gils CH, Tamimi RM. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 10;106(5):dju078. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju078.
Bond-Smith D, Stone J. Methodological Challenges and Updated Findings from a Meta-analysis of the Association between Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jan;28(1):22-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1175. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
Comstock CE, Gatsonis C, Newstead GM, Snyder BS, Gareen IF, Bergin JT, Rahbar H, Sung JS, Jacobs C, Harvey JA, Nicholson MH, Ward RC, Holt J, Prather A, Miller KD, Schnall MD, Kuhl CK. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening. JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):746-756. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0572.
Veenhuizen SGA, de Lange SV, Bakker MF, Pijnappel RM, Mann RM, Monninkhof EM, Emaus MJ, de Koekkoek-Doll PK, Bisschops RHC, Lobbes MBI, de Jong MDF, Duvivier KM, Veltman J, Karssemeijer N, de Koning HJ, van Diest PJ, Mali WPTM, van den Bosch MAAJ, van Gils CH, Veldhuis WB; DENSE Trial Study Group. Supplemental Breast MRI for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts: Results of the Second Screening Round of the DENSE Trial. Radiology. 2021 May;299(2):278-286. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203633. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
Weinstein SP, Korhonen K, Cirelli C, Schnall MD, McDonald ES, Pantel AR, Zuckerman S, Borthakur A, Conant EF. Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 20;38(33):3874-3882. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02198. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
Expert Panel on Breast Imaging; Weinstein SP, Slanetz PJ, Lewin AA, Battaglia T, Chagpar AB, Dayaratna S, Dibble EH, Goel MS, Hayward JH, Kubicky CD, Le-Petross HT, Newell MS, Sanford MF, Scheel JR, Vincoff NS, Yao K, Moy L. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11S):S456-S473. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.002.
Wolf, Tom. "Insurance Company Law of 1921 - Coverage for Mammographic Examinations." The Office Website for the Pennsylvania General Assembly, Pennsylvania General Assembly, 2020, https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/li/uconsCheck.cfm?yr=2020&sessInd=0&act=52.
Niraula S, Biswanger N, Hu P, Lambert P, Decker K. Incidence, Characteristics, and Outcomes of Interval Breast Cancers Compared With Screening-Detected Breast Cancers. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2018179. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18179.
Monsees BS. The Mammography Quality Standards Act. An overview of the regulations and guidance. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):759-72. doi: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70199-8.
Sedrak MS, Myers JS, Small DS, Nachamkin I, Ziemba JB, Murray D, Kurtzman GW, Zhu J, Wang W, Mincarelli D, Danoski D, Wells BP, Berns JS, Brennan PJ, Hanson CW, Dine CJ, Patel MS. Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests: The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):939-945. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1144.
Patel MS, Kurtzman GW, Kannan S, Small DS, Morris A, Honeywell S Jr, Leri D, Rareshide CAL, Day SC, Mahoney KB, Volpp KG, Asch DA. Effect of an Automated Patient Dashboard Using Active Choice and Peer Comparison Performance Feedback to Physicians on Statin Prescribing: The PRESCRIBE Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180818. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0818.
Takvorian SU, Bekelman J, Beidas RS, Schnoll R, Clifton ABW, Salam T, Gabriel P, Wileyto EP, Scott CA, Asch DA, Buttenheim AM, Rendle KA, Chaiyachati K, Shelton RC, Ware S, Chivers C, Schuchter LM, Kumar P, Shulman LN, O'Connor N, Lieberman A, Zentgraf K, Parikh RB. Behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve serious illness communication between clinicians and high-risk patients with cancer: protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic trial. Implement Sci. 2021 Sep 25;16(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01156-6.
Jenssen BP, Schnoll R, Beidas R, Bekelman J, Bauer AM, Scott C, Evers-Casey S, Nicoloso J, Gabriel P, Asch DA, Buttenheim A, Chen J, Melo J, Shulman LN, Clifton ABW, Lieberman A, Salam T, Zentgraf K, Rendle KA, Chaiyachati K, Shelton R, Wileyto EP, Ware S, Leone F. Rationale and protocol for a cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to improve tobacco treatment rates for cancer patients who smoke. Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 15;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01139-7.
McCarthy AM, Fernandez Perez C, Beidas RS, Bekelman JE, Blumenthal D, Mack E, Bauer AM, Ehsan S, Conant EF, Wheeler BC, Guerra CE, Nunes LW, Gabriel P, Doucette A, Wileyto EP, Buttenheim AM, Asch DA, Rendle KA, Shelton RC, Fayanju OM, Ware S, Plag M, Hyland S, Gionta T, Shulman LN, Schnoll R. Protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to increase supplemental breast MRI screening among patients with extremely dense breasts. Implement Sci. 2023 Nov 24;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01323-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
852666
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
UPCC 03123
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.