Trial Outcomes & Findings for Social Workers Addressing Firearm Risk (NCT NCT05784662)
NCT ID: NCT05784662
Last Updated: 2025-02-10
Results Overview
Assessed with the Knowledge about gun violence measure (novel). Theoretical minimum/maximum = 0.0/5.0. High scores indicate more knowledge about firearm safety.
COMPLETED
NA
111 participants
Baseline, 1 month later, and 3 months later
2025-02-10
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SAFR Arm
Proportion of the randomized sample that received the SAFR intervention, a self-paced 4 hour online training about how to assess and intervene with clients at-risk for gun violence.
|
WL Control Arm
Proportion of the randomized sample that did not receive the SAFR intervention during the study period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
63
|
48
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
42
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
21
|
17
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SAFR Arm
Proportion of the randomized sample that received the SAFR intervention, a self-paced 4 hour online training about how to assess and intervene with clients at-risk for gun violence.
|
WL Control Arm
Proportion of the randomized sample that did not receive the SAFR intervention during the study period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
21
|
17
|
Baseline Characteristics
Social Workers Addressing Firearm Risk
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Social Workers Addressing Firearm Risk
n=63 Participants
The Social workers Addressing Firearm Risk (SAFR) intervention is fully-online intervention that contains four modules. Each module includes interviews with experts, didactic content, handouts, and brief quizzes to check learning (required by New York State for continuing education credit).
Social Workers Addressing Firearm Risk: Educational intervention for social workers.
|
Control
n=48 Participants
Wait list control. Will receive access to SAFR intervention at conclusion of the study.
|
Total
n=111 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
40.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=5 Participants
|
39.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=7 Participants
|
40.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
80 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
63 participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 participants
n=7 Participants
|
111 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month later, and 3 months laterPopulation: Some participants lost to follow up and/or had missing data on outcomes measures.
Assessed with the Knowledge about gun violence measure (novel). Theoretical minimum/maximum = 0.0/5.0. High scores indicate more knowledge about firearm safety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SAFR Arm
n=47 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that received the SAFR intervention.
|
WL Control Arm
n=38 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that did not receive the SAFR intervention during the study period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Knowledge About Gun Violence
Baseline (pretest)
|
2.49 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
2.54 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
|
Change in Knowledge About Gun Violence
One month later (post-test)
|
2.94 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
2.66 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
|
Change in Knowledge About Gun Violence
Three months later (follow-up)
|
3.01 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
2.63 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month later, and 3 months laterPopulation: Some participants lost to follow up and/or had missing data in outcome measures.
Assessed with the Attitudes about firearms safety counseling (novel). Theoretical minimum/maximum = 0/5.00. High scores indicate greater inclination towards discussing firearm safety with clients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SAFR Arm
n=63 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that received the SAFR intervention.
|
WL Control Arm
n=48 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that did not receive the SAFR intervention during the study period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Attitudes About Firearms Safety Counseling
Baseline (pre-test)
|
2.97 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
3.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Change in Attitudes About Firearms Safety Counseling
One month later (post-test)
|
3.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
3.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Change in Attitudes About Firearms Safety Counseling
Three months later (follow-up)
|
3.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
3.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month later, and 3 months laterPopulation: Some participants lost to follow up and/or had missing data on outcomes measures.
Assessed with the Confidence about firearms safety counseling (novel). Theoretical minimum/maximum = 0/5.00. High scores indicate greater confidence about discussing firearm safety with clients.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SAFR Arm
n=52 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that received the SAFR intervention.
|
WL Control Arm
n=40 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that did not receive the SAFR intervention during the study period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Confidence About Firearms Safety Counseling
Baseline (pre-test)
|
2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Change in Confidence About Firearms Safety Counseling
One month later (post-test)
|
2.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
2.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
|
Change in Confidence About Firearms Safety Counseling
Three months later (follow-up)
|
3.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month later, and 3 months laterPopulation: Some participants lost to follow up and/or had missing data on outcomes measures.
Assessed with the Behaviors with Clients measure (novel). Theoretical minimum/maximum = 0/5.00. High scores indicate more interventions about firearm safety with clients. This scale asked questions like, "I talk to my clients about firearm access," with answers ranging from Strongly disagree to strongly agree.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SAFR Arm
n=52 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that received the SAFR intervention.
|
WL Control Arm
n=39 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that did not receive the SAFR intervention during the study period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Behaviors With Clients
Baseline (pre-test)
|
2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
|
Change in Behaviors With Clients
One month later (post-test)
|
2.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
|
Change in Behaviors With Clients
Three months later (follow-up)
|
2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month later, and 3 months laterPopulation: Some participants lost to follow up and/or had missing data on outcomes measures.
Assessed with the Behaviors with Clients in last month measure (novel). Theoretical minimum/maximum = 0/2.00. Higher scores indicate more interventions about firearm safety with clients. This scale asked questions like, "In the last month, I have provided clients with information about firearm safety..." with answers specified as "none of the time," "some of the time," and "all of the time."
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SAFR Arm
n=53 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that received the SAFR intervention.
|
WL Control Arm
n=43 Participants
Proportion of the randomized sample that did not receive the SAFR intervention during the study period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Behaviors With Clients in Last Month
Baseline (pre-test)
|
0.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
|
Change in Behaviors With Clients in Last Month
One month later (post-test)
|
0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
|
Change in Behaviors With Clients in Last Month
Three months later (follow-up)
|
0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
Adverse Events
SAFR Arm
WL Control Arm
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Patricia Logan-Greene
University at Buffalo, School of Social Work
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place