Continuous Monitoring of Glycemic Variability to Predict Dys- and Hyperglycemia in Asymptomatic Type 1 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT05777330

Last Updated: 2025-09-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-09

Study Completion Date

2028-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this longitudinal clinical trial is to measure variability of interstitial glucose levels with a user-friendly real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology at regular intervals in normo- and dysglycemic multiple autoantibody-positive individuals (age 5-39 years), in comparison with single autoantibody-positive individuals in the same age range. Participants will asked to undergo repeated oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) (age 5-39 years) and hyperglycemic clamp tests (age 12-39 years) in parallel for a period of at least 2-3 years. In case of confirmed dysglycemia, we propose to perform CGM and OGTT every 3 months.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

1. Do the amplitude and time trends of CGM-derived glycemic variability indices and OGTT- and clamp-derived variables differ between the intermediate, high and very high risk groups?
2. Can (changes in) CGM-derived glycemic variability indices predict/detect dysglycemia in initially normoglycemic (single or multiple autoantibody-positive) individuals with the same diagnostic efficiency as OGTT- or clamp-derived variables?
3. Can (changes in) CGM-derived glycemic variability indices predict clinical onset in (stage 1 or 2) multiple autoantibody-positive individuals with the same diagnostic efficiency as OGTT- or clamp-derived variables?
4. Can correlating (changes in) CGM-derived indices with (changes in) OGTT- and clamp-derived variables help to better understand the sequence of events leading to dysglycemia and clinical onset, as well as the relative contribution of beta cell function and insulin action to glycemic variability according to disease stage and biological and phenotypical characteristics of the individuals?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Type 1 diabetes is a for now incurable disease caused by a major immune-mediated loss of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells, can lead to potentially severe acute and chronic complications and requires a lifelong insulin treatment. Clinical onset of type 1 diabetes is preceded by an asymptomatic disease phase of highly variable duration, which is signaled by the presence of multiple (≥2) types of islet autoantibodies. Multiple autoantibody-positive individuals, with blood glucose levels still within normal limits (defined as stage 1 type 1 diabetes) have a 90% risk of developing symptomatic disease within the next 20 years. The development of dysglycemia (stage 2 type 1 diabetes) - i.e. disturbed blood glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) - dramatically raises the risk of impending clinical onset to 90% within 5 years. Identifying individuals at high risk of impending clinical onset of type 1 diabetes is important for early diagnosis, for reducing the incidence of inaugural ketoacidosis, and for enrolling participants of choice in immune intervention trials before and at clinical diagnosis, aiming to develop an effective cure or even better, prevention. The hyperglycemic clamp test is the gold standard for assessing beta cell function and has also been validated for estimating insulin action in parallel. Decreased clamp-derived measures of islet function and insulin action have been shown to outperform OGTT-derived variables for predicting progression to symptomatic disease. However, the repeated performance of both OGTTs and clamps are cumbersome and difficult to implement on a large scale in a seemingly healthy population. In contrast, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) methods nowadays avoid the need of frequent calibration based on capillary blood measurements obtained by finger pricks. They also allow to detect more subtle glycemic fluctuations over longer observation periods and on a more frequent basis than achievable with OGTT, and to derive a wide variety of indices of glycemic variability. Preliminary findings suggest that repeated CGM metrics in stage 1 asymptomatic diabetes could represent a minimally invasive alternative to OGTT for early detection or prediction of stage 2 asymptomatic disease, provided that increased CGM-derived glycemic excursions can be shown to coincide with or precede OGTT-inferred dysglycemia, respectively, in a longitudinal study. In addition, it is anticipated that further increasing glycemic excursions may forecast impending clinical onset. Using the capacity of the nationwide network of the Belgian Diabetes Registry, we therefore propose a longitudinal study to measure variability of interstitial glucose levels with a userfriendly real-time CGM technology at regular intervals (every 6 months) during follow-up of multiple autoantibody-positive first-degree individuals (age 5-39 years; n\>50) of type 1 diabetes patients, in comparison with single autoantibody-positive individuals (n\>25). In parallel repeated OGTTs (age 5-39 years) and hyperglycemic clamp tests (age 12-39 years) will be performed for a period of at least 2-3 years. We anticipate that, especially when using up-to-date CGM technology, (i) the amplitude and time trends of various glycemic variability indices - alone or in combination - will differ between groups of individuals at moderate (single autoantibody-positive), high (stage 1), and very high (stage 2) risk of impending clinical onset (stage 3); (ii) (changes in) CGM-derived glycemic variability indices will be able to predict and/or diagnose stage 2 asymptomatic type 1 diabetes and clinical onset (stage 3) with a diagnostic efficiency equaling that of variables derived from (repeated) OGTT or clamp tests; (iii) correlating CGM metrics with hyperglycemic clamp- and OGTT-derived indices of beta cell function and insulin action will help to understand the relative contribution of both components to disease progression in general, and to glycemic variability in particular.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type1 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Autoantibody-positive individuals

Group Type OTHER

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Longitudinal study using repeated OGTT, CGM and hyperglycemic clamp tests to evaluate glycemic variability, beta cell function and insulin action in individuals at moderate, high and very high risk of clinical onset of type 1 diabetes.

OGTT is performed every 6 months (every 3 months in case of dysglycemia) in all participants.

Hyperglycemic clamp test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Longitudinal study using repeated OGTT, CGM and hyperglycemic clamp tests to evaluate glycemic variability, beta cell function and insulin action in individuals at moderate, high and very high risk of clinical onset of type 1 diabetes.

Clamp test is performed every 12 months in single autoantibody-positive participants and every 6 months in multiple autoantibody-positive participants. Clamp tests are not performed in participants aged between 5-11 years.

Continuous glucose monitoring

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Longitudinal study using repeated OGTT, CGM and hyperglycemic clamp tests to evaluate glycemic variability, beta cell function and insulin action in individuals at moderate, high and very high risk of clinical onset of type 1 diabetes.

A 10-day CGM recording is performed every 6 months (every 3 months in case of dysglycemia) in all participants.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

Longitudinal study using repeated OGTT, CGM and hyperglycemic clamp tests to evaluate glycemic variability, beta cell function and insulin action in individuals at moderate, high and very high risk of clinical onset of type 1 diabetes.

OGTT is performed every 6 months (every 3 months in case of dysglycemia) in all participants.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Hyperglycemic clamp test

Longitudinal study using repeated OGTT, CGM and hyperglycemic clamp tests to evaluate glycemic variability, beta cell function and insulin action in individuals at moderate, high and very high risk of clinical onset of type 1 diabetes.

Clamp test is performed every 12 months in single autoantibody-positive participants and every 6 months in multiple autoantibody-positive participants. Clamp tests are not performed in participants aged between 5-11 years.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Continuous glucose monitoring

Longitudinal study using repeated OGTT, CGM and hyperglycemic clamp tests to evaluate glycemic variability, beta cell function and insulin action in individuals at moderate, high and very high risk of clinical onset of type 1 diabetes.

A 10-day CGM recording is performed every 6 months (every 3 months in case of dysglycemia) in all participants.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

OGTT clamp Dexcom G6 CGM

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. aged 5-39 years at inclusion;
2. absence of diabetes meeting the clinical diagnostic American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria;
3. persistently positive for one or multiple types of autoantibodies among IAA, GADA, IA-2A and ZnT8A.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnancy or lactation in women; \<6 months postpartum
2. Diabetes meeting the clinical diagnostic ADA criteria;
3. Use of illicit drugs, or overconsumption of alcohol, or history of drug or alcohol abuse;
4. Being legally incapacitated, having significant emotional problems at the time of the study, or having a history of psychiatric disorders;
5. Treatment with immune modulating or diabetogenic medication (e.g. corticosteroids) or medication that act to lower glycemia (oral antidiabetics) or agents that may influence insulin sensitivity or secretion;
6. Gastric bypass or banding;
7. History of acute or chronic pancreatitis, or (partial) pancreatectomy
8. History of any illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the results of the study or pose additional risks to the subjects.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

39 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Breakthrough T1D

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bart Keymeulen

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique CHC MontLégia

Liège, Liège, Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

A.Z. Sint-Jan Brugge

Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Jette, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Belgian Diabetes Registry

Role: CONTACT

02 477 45 46 ext. +32

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alexandra Van Eyck

Role: primary

04 355 42 14

Fabienne Beyaert

Role: primary

Beeldens Jente

Role: primary

+3 436 8409

Rie Braspenning

Role: backup

+32 3 821 4002

Nancy Platteau

Role: primary

+329 332 6394

Els Feyen

Role: backup

Karen Hanssens

Role: primary

+322 477 77 60

Natalie Van den Driessche

Role: primary

+3216 34 85 54

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PredicT1D

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.