Trial of Reduced Alteplase Dose for Parapneumonic Effusion (TRAPPE)

NCT ID: NCT05766124

Last Updated: 2025-12-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-01

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objectives: A pilot study to assess the feasibility of randomizing patients to receive low (2.5mg) and standard (10mg) doses of intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in unresolved pleural infection, as well as the key outcome measures that are important to identify relevant patient-centered outcomes in a subsequent RCT.

Hypothesis: The proposed randomized protocol comparing intrapleural low and standard doses of intrapleural tPA will be feasible and acceptable.

Design and subjects: A pilot, single-centre, two-arm, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) which includes subjects with unresolved pleural infection, with follow-up till 90 days after hospital discharge.

Interventions: Recruited subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive a maximum of 6 doses of intrapleural tPA starting at either 2.5mg or 10mg. A clinical decision is allowed at or after the third dose to continue with the assigned dose or escalate to 10mg to complete the course based on the clinical response, without breaking the blinding.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome will be feasibility based on \>50% of eligible patients being successfully randomized, \>95% of randomized participants retained to discharge, and \>80% of randomized participants retained to 3 months of follow-up. Important secondary outcomes include survival at 90 days and without the need for surgical intervention, the need for additional pleural interventions, number of decisions to choose 10mg intrapleural tPA at the third dose, clinical and radiographic response after the treatment course, safety profiles especially bleeding complications, and the number and reason for protocol violation.

Data analysis and expected results: Data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis for all randomized subjects. Clinical and safety outcomes will be reported descriptively for each group, with simple between-group estimates given the limited sample size. The resulting estimates of recruitment rates, adherence, follow-up completeness, and variability and event rates for key clinical and bleeding outcomes will be used, together with external data, to inform the design and sample size considerations of a subsequent full-scale multicentred RCT incorporating the current study design.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pleural infection, including complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema, is a common complication secondary to pneumonia, and its presence predicts a need of hospitalization, longer hospital stay and higher mortality (10 - 20%). Timely and effective treatment is required to lower the related morbidity and mortality.

The cornerstone of management for pleural infection involves adequate drainage of infected pleural fluid and adequate antibiotics coverage. However, this only works in 70% of cases. Complete evacuation of pleural fluid can become challenging even with an adequately large-bore chest drain, due to its viscous nature and extensive septations partitioning the infected fluid into multiple locules in the pleural space. Although surgical decortication in these refractory cases was once believed to be the definitive treatment, it is now considered as the last resort of treatment due to a high anaesthetic risk whilst uncontrolled sepsis, high rate of chronic post thoracotomy pain (50%) and unavoidable bleeding. The advent of intrapleural therapy using tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) has revolutionized the care in pleural infection, as shown in the pivotal MIST-2 trial. Their synergistic effect targeting the pus viscosity and pleural adhesions can greatly improve the drainage of pleural fluid, which avoided the need for surgery in more than 90% of patients.

The optimal dose of intrapleural tPA remains undefined. The dose of 10mg used in the MIST-2 trial was chosen empirically and had not been subjected to conventionally dose-escalation assessment or long-term pharmacovigilance follow-up. In such case any major adverse effects can be a hindering factor of using this medication at the standard dose. An occurrence rate of bleeding complication between 1.8 and 12% using the dose of 10mg tPA has been reported by several large-scale studies. Clinically significant bleeding warrants additional intervention including pack cell transfusion, radiological interventions and even surgical haemostasis. This risk is therefore one of the driving forces urging for finding a safer and lower effective dose. A dose-dependent bleeding risk of intravenous tPA has been established, and such linkage may probably exist for intrapleural tPA. Alemán C et al has reported that a double dose of intrapleural tPA was associated with a doubling of serious bleeding complications (28% for 20mg and 12% for 10mg). Therefore, it appears logical and safe that a lower dose of intrapleural tPA may reduce the bleeding risk.

Several studies have reported that a lower dose (\< 10mg) of intrapleural tPA remains efficacious in pleural infection. In an animal study, a median tPA dose of 3.75mg (range 0.375 - 20mg) was required for the treatment of fibrinous pleuropneumonia in horses, with an average weight 4 to 10 times higher than humans. A multi-centered dose de-escalation study by Popowicz et al has confirmed that a combination of 5mg tPA together with 5mg DNase is safe and effective. They employed a pragmatic approach to begin therapy with a lower tPA dose (5mg) and return to the conventional dose (10mg) if lack of clinical response is observed. The reduced tPA dose was well tolerated with a bleeding complication comparable to previous studies using 10mg tPA. A similar cohort study, ADAPT-2, assessed the clinical outcomes of an even lower starting dose of intrapleural tPA at 2.5mg. The lower dose remained efficacious, with only 2 patients (2.9%) required surgery and a low rate of bleeding complication (2.9%) compared with 4.2% in the landmark MIST-2 trial. The lower dose of tPA, with a potentially lower bleeding risk, provides an attractive alternative especially in patients who require therapeutic anticoagulation and those with acquired coagulopathy due to overwhelming sepsis. A standard dose (10mg) can be employed at any time in an attempt to break non-communicating locules if clinical improvement could not be achieved by a low dose tPA, while it is not practical to do the other way round if clinical efficacy is observed with standard dose tPA.

Till now, there is no high quality data comparing the treatment efficacy and bleeding complications between low dose (\< 10mg) with standard dose (10mg) in pleural infection. It was reflected by a heterogeneous practice in choosing the optimal dose of intrapleural tPA from a recent international survey among practicing physicians expert in pleural medicine. The respondents would consider using a lower starting dose of tPA (with the possibility of escalation if clinically needed) if a median 80% (interquartile range 50-80%) of patients could be successfully treated at that dose.

Using an unchanged low dose of tPA throughout the course of treatment may put the patients in disadvantage of subjecting them to the need for surgery if failed treatment. Previous dose de-escalation studies employed a low starting dose of intrapleural tPA and allowed an escalation to the standard dose in the midway of treatment course depending on the clinical progress at the discretion of treatment physicians and this practice is also preferred from the international survey. We hypothesize that a standardized regimen with pre-defined clinical criteria is essential in guiding the decision of dose escalation in a RCT. Therefore, in this pilot study, we aim to test the feasibility, robustness in clinical practice and physician acceptance before incorporating it in a full-scale multicenter RCT

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pleural Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Recruited subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive a course of maximum of 6 doses intrapleural tPA (Actilyse®, 50mg ampoule, Boehringer Ingelheim) with starting dose at either low dose (2.5mg) or standard dose (10mg) in addition to fixed dose deoxyribonuclease. The first dose of intrapleural tPA will be given at the time of randomization. At or after the third dose of tPA, the attending physician will be allowed to continue with the assigned dose of tPA or escalate to 10mg tPA for the remaining doses based on the clinical response, without knowing the previous doses and not breaking the blinding. This study will follow patients through their hospital stay and at outpatient visits at 30 and 90 days.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The research team, clinicians, nursing staff, and patients will be blinded to the treatment arm. A copy of the randomisation code will be held only by a research team member performing randomisation. Access to this code for a patient before the completion of the trial, will only be permitted in exceptional circumstances, such as being necessary to determine the best acute medical care for a patient, and only after discussion with the Principal Investigator (PI) or his deputy. Pharmacy staff will receive unblinded randomisation information in order to prepare the study drug of assigned doses. The labelling of the blinded drugs will be under the supervision of a dedicated pharmacy. Each course of trial treatments will be pre-prepared in a trial numbered pack and dispensed to the ward at randomisation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low dose tPA

Patients with pleural infection and will receive a starting dose of tPA at 2.5mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Intervention Type DRUG

Intrapleural administration of tissue plasminogen activator

Standard dose tPA

Patients with pleural infection and will receive a starting dose of tPA at 10mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Intervention Type DRUG

Intrapleural administration of tissue plasminogen activator

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tissue Plasminogen Activator

Intrapleural administration of tissue plasminogen activator

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Alteplase

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical features suggesting uncontrolled pleural infection with incomplete drainage of pleural effusion, at least 1 day after insertion of pleural drain (French size 12 or above) and administration of antibiotics.
* Intend to administer intrapleural fibrinolytic
* Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Previously received intrapleural tPA to the ipsilateral pleural space for the current episode of pleural infection.
* Known sensitivity to tPA or DNase.
* A coincidental stroke, major haemorrhage or major trauma.
* Frank bleeding or evidence of puncture to the intercostal artery during chest drain insertion.
* Ongoing frank bleeding from the ipsilateral pleural space.
* Has had puncture of a non-compressible vessel in the previous 14 days.
* Has had major surgery in the previous 14 days.
* Has had unprovoked gastrointestinal bleeding or intracranial haemorrhage in the last 3 months.
* Active use of anticoagulation (except prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis) or dual-antiplatelet agents.
* Active use of any systemic fibrinolytic therapy or any airway DNase therapy.
* On long-term macrolide antibiotics (as they may interact with DNase).
* Uncorrectable bleeding diathesis or baseline INR \> 1.5.
* Has had a previous pneumonectomy (either on the same or contralateral side).
* Presence of active bronchopleural fistula.
* Age less than 18 years old.
* Patients who are pregnant or lactating (females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before randomisation).
* Expected survival less than three months from a different pathology to this empyema (e.g. metastatic lung carcinoma).
* Use of agents under research or not registered in the 30 days prior to the study.
* Inability to give informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ka Pang Chan

Clinical Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David SC Hui, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ka Pang Chan, MBChB

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 35052211

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ka Pang Chan, MBChB

Role: primary

David SC Hui, MD

Role: backup

Ka Pang Chan, MBChB

Role: primary

David SC Hui, MD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRAPPE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id