Phase 3 Safety Study for the Treatment of Presbyopia Subjects

NCT ID: NCT05753189

Last Updated: 2024-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

362 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-21

Study Completion Date

2024-02-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Safety Study of the Long-Term Safety of LNZ101 in Presbyopic Subjects

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Safety Study: Multi-Center, Double-Masked Phase 3 Evaluation of the Long-Term Safety of LNZ101 in Presbyopic Subjects

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Presbyopia Near Vision Miosis Eye Diseases

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Pharmaceutical Solutions Opthalmic Solutions Eye Drops CLARITY Presbyopia Miotic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A Multi-Center, Double-Masked Phase 3 Evaluation of the Long-Term Safety of LNZ101 in Presbyopic Subjects
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Double-masked treatment will be used to reduce potential of bias during data collection and the evaluation of clinical endpoints.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Combination ophthalmic solution (LNZ101) dosed bilaterally

LNZ 101: Aceclidine/Brimonidine Ophthalmic Solution

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aceclidine+Brimonidine combination ophthalmic solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Combination ophthalmic solution of Aceclidine and Brimonidine

Placebo (Vehicle) ophthalmic solution dosed bilaterally

Placebo: Proprietary Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo: Proprietary Vehicle Solution

Aceclidine ophthalmic solution dosed bilaterally

LNZ 100: Aceclidine ophthalmic solution

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Aceclidine Ophthalmic Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Aceclidine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Aceclidine+Brimonidine combination ophthalmic solution

Combination ophthalmic solution of Aceclidine and Brimonidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo: Proprietary Vehicle Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Aceclidine Ophthalmic Solution

Aceclidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LNZ101 Vehicle LNZ100

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Be able and willing to provide written informed consent and sign a Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) form prior to any study procedure being performed;
2. Be able and willing to follow all instructions and attend all study visits;
3. Be 45-75 years of age of either sex and any race or ethnicity at Visit 1;
4. Be presbyopic in both eyes as determined by manifest refraction documented at Visit 1;
5. Have +1.00 to -4.00 diopter(D) of sphere calculated in minus cylinder (up to 2.00D of cylinder) in both eyes determined by manifest refraction documented at Visit 1

Exclusion Criteria

1. Be a female of childbearing potential who is currently pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy;
2. Have known contraindications or sensitivity to the use of any of the study medications or their components;
3. Have an active ocular infection at Visit 1 (bacterial, viral, or fungal), positive history of an ocular herpetic infection, preauricular lymphadenopathy, or ongoing, active ocular inflammation in either eye;
4. Have moderate or severe dry eye defined as total corneal fluorescein staining at Visit 1;
5. Have clinically significant abnormal lens findings during dilated slit-lamp biomicroscopy and fundus exam at Visit 1
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ORA, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

LENZ Therapeutics, Inc

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alisyn Facemire, BA

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

LENZ Therapeutics

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Site #326

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Site #302

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site #320

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site #321

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site #328

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site #338

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site #331

Sun City, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Site #303

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Site #313

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Site #334

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Site #322

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Site #306

Petaluma, California, United States

Site Status

Site #337

Rancho Cordova, California, United States

Site Status

Site #304

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Site #308

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Site #316

Danbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Site #319

Crystal River, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site #309

Mt. Dora, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site #317

Rock Island, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Site #301

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Site #307

Pittsburg, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Site #324

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Site #336

Alexandria, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Site #330

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Site #335

Bozeman, Montana, United States

Site Status

Site #310

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Site #332

West Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Site #329

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site #323

Powell, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Site #333

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Site #312

Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Site #315

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site #311

Smyrna, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site #314

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site #327

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site #318

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22-150-0017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id