Short Acting Agents Vs Long Acting in Frequent Excerbator COPD Patients

NCT ID: NCT05748977

Last Updated: 2023-03-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-20

Study Completion Date

2024-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is heterogeneous lung condition characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum production, exacerbations) due to abnormalities of the airways (bronchitis, bronchiolitis) and/or alveoli (emphysema) that cause persistent, often progressive ,airflow obstruction.

There are network meta analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of short acting bronchodilators Vs long acting agents in treatment of COPD

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim of the work1.To compare efficacy of short acting beta 2 agonists ,short acting antimuscrinic agents and beclomethasone versus long acting beta 2 agonist,short acting antimuscurnic agents and fluticasone.- Type of the study: This study is a randomized controlled trail 2.4. 2- Study Setting: Present study will be conducted in chest outpatient clinic Chest department Assiut University hospital 2.4. 3- Study subjects: Frequent exacerbator COPD patients Based on determining the main outcome variable, the estimated minimum required sample size is 80 patients (40 in each group).

Main outcome variable is difference in dyspnoea scores in frequent exacerbator COPD patients receiving long-acting steroids vs. short acting treatment. Based on previous systematic review we expected to find significant improvement in long-acting treatment group (large effect size). Data will be collected through: patients diagnosed COPD by different investigations (history, examinations spirometry) have recurrent exacerbations, some patients receiving short acting beta 2 agonists, short acting anti-muscurnic agents and beclomethasone versus long acting agents and fluticasone then all patients followed using dyspnea scores, CCQ, saint George questionnaire which assess heath related quality of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Copd

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SABA,SAMA ICS

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs

Intervention Type DRUG

Short acting agents,long acting agents ,ics

LABA,LAMA ICS

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs

Intervention Type DRUG

Short acting agents,long acting agents ,ics

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SABA SAMA ICS Vs LABA LAMA ICs

Short acting agents,long acting agents ,ics

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All frequent exacerabator copd patients

Exclusion Criteria

* patients less than 18
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nermen Abuelkassem

lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

nermen M abuelkassem, Lecturer

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MD

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nermen Mohammed Abuelkassem

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

nermen M abuelkassem, lecturer

Role: CONTACT

01000767713

mohammed gamal Abdelrahman, lecturer

Role: CONTACT

01026600071

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mohammed Gamal Abdalrahman Khalaf

Role: primary

01026600071

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SABA,SAMA versus LABA,LAMAcopd

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.