Cannula-based Versus Needle-based Subcision for Posttraumatic Atrophic Facial Scars

NCT ID: NCT05747898

Last Updated: 2023-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-11-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cannula- based subcision versus common needle subcision in treatment of posttraumatic atrophic facial scars

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In addition to cosmetic issues, atrophic scars can lead to psychological issues like social isolation, low self-esteem, and embarrassment. Subcision (Subcutaneous incision-less surgery) has been used for years to treat a variety of skin depressions, including atrophic acne scars and other depressed scars. Numerous modifications have been made throughout time to this surgical method to make it easier and more efficient. Although needle subcision is a straightforward, simple, useful, and practical procedure, it has many side effects and the overall success in this procedure is mild to moderate. So, in this study we evaluated the effectiveness of cannula- based subcision versus common needle subcision in treatment of posttraumatic atrophic facial scars.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Scar; Atrophy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Each scar was split into two equal halves; the upper right half were treated using a cannula- based subcision approach, while the lower left half was treated using a common needle-based procedure
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The assessor was blinded to the treatment applied to each half of the scar.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cannula arm

the cannula's 18 gauge tip was pointed upward and approximately parallel to the skin's surface when it was put into the superficial dermis, 1-2 millimeters away from the targeted scar. In order to completely remove fibrous tissue from the superficial dermis, a lancing motion (linear inserting-withdrawing needle action) was utilized first.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cannula- based subcision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Insertion of a needle into the base of a cutaneous scar to cut fibrous tissue and help new collagen formation.

Needle arm

The needle's 27 gauge tip was pointed upward and approximately parallel to the skin's surface when it was put into the superficial dermis, 1-2 millimeters away from the targeted scar. In order to completely remove fibrous tissue from the superficial dermis, a lancing motion (linear inserting-withdrawing needle action) was utilized first.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

common- needle based subcision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Insertion of a cannula into the base of a cutaneous scar to cut fibrous tissue and help new collagen formation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cannula- based subcision

Insertion of a needle into the base of a cutaneous scar to cut fibrous tissue and help new collagen formation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

common- needle based subcision

Insertion of a cannula into the base of a cutaneous scar to cut fibrous tissue and help new collagen formation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult Patients (\> 20-years old) with posttraumatic facial scar

Exclusion Criteria

* other types of scars (e.g; postacne scars), pregnancy, lactation, bleeding or coagulation disorders, liability for keloid formation, history of kobnerization, and patients with systemic diseases (cardiac, chronic renal diseases, chronic liver diseases, asthma and hypertension) at the time of recruitment.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sohag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marwa Mohamed

Lecturer of Dermatology, Venereology, and Andrology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marwa Mohamed, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sohag University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sohag University

Sohag, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

subatrophic001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id