Thoracic Paravertebral Block Anesthesia for Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05711030
Last Updated: 2024-02-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-11-04
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Mastectomies are traditionally performed under general anesthesia (GA), often with the addition of regional anesthesia for post-operative pain relief. Thoracic paravertebral blocks (TPVB) had previously been described in the literature to be sufficient for intra-operative anesthesia as an alternative to GA. A 2021 literature review by Cochrane Library comparing paravertebral anesthesia (with or without sedation) to general anesthesia for patients undergoing oncologic breast surgery showed that TPVB could reduce post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), hospital stay, postoperative pain and time to ambulation. It also resulted in greater patient satisfaction compared to GA.
The aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of single-injection TPVB done under ultrasound guidance for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery without axillary node dissection.
Hypothesis: Single-injection thoracic paravertebral block is non-inferior to multiple (3) injections for oncologic unilateral breast surgery anesthesia.
Methods: The current study is a prospective randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing oncologic breast surgery without axillary node dissection or immediate reconstruction. Patients will be randomized into two groups; thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) single-injection or TPVB multiple (three) injections.
Significance/Importance: Oncologic breast surgery performed under TPVB and sedation lowers the risks of post-operative nausea and vomiting, decreases peri-operative use of narcotics, decreases pain scores at rest and on mobilization and leads to better overall patient satisfaction when compared to GA. It also leads to shorter hospital stays. Most studies use multiple injections to perform the block. Even though the risks associated with TPVB are low (3.6 per 1000 surgeries), the single-injection technique could reduce the risks even more. One injection is also easier to perform and of shorter duration, leading to greater patient tolerance and less side effects related to blocks performance duration such as vaso-vagal reactions or general discomfort. To date, no studies have compared the efficacy of single-injection paravertebral block and multiple injection techniques as the main modality of anesthesia for breast cancer surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reducing Pain and Disability After Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT01089933
The Effect of Thoracal Paravertebral Block on Seroma Reduction in Breast Surgery
NCT03650868
A Randomized Controlled Comparative Study of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Blocks as Part of a Multimodal Regimen for Ambulatory Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT01654432
Efficacy of Thoracic Paravertebral Block in the Reduction of Acute Post-surgical Pain in Patients With Breast Cancer
NCT02609321
Paravertebral Blocks for Breast Cancer Surgery
NCT01904266
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our hypothesis is that the TPVB performed as a single injection is non inferior to multiple (three) injections for unilateral oncologic breast surgery without axillary intervention.
The current study is a prospective randomized controlled trial of patients undergoing oncologic breast surgery without axillary node dissection or immediate reconstruction. Patients will be randomized into two groups; thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) single-injection or TPVB multiple (three) injections. Sedation and analgesia will be standardized for both groups. The block will be performed preemptively by a blinded anesthesiologist at least 20 minutes before surgical incision. 30 milliliters (ml) of ropivacaine 0.5% will be injected on the operating side (maximum 3 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg)) either as a single injection or fractionated into three injections at three different paravertebral levels.
Preemptive postoperative analgesia plan:
• Each patient will receive standard preemptive postoperative analgesic medication comprising of oral acetaminophen 1 gram (g) preoperatively
Preemptive postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention plan:
• Each patient will receive standard preemptive postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention medication comprising of dexamethasone 4 mg intravenous (IV) at the beginning of the procedure and ondansetron 4 mg IV at the end of the procedure.
Patients will be offered midazolam 1-2 mg IV as needed (PRN) and fentanyl 25-50 mcg IV PRN before performing the TPVB.
All patients will be monitored using 5-lead electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring. A NOL index (NOL trademark (™), Medasense Biometrics Ltd, Ramat Gan, Israel) as well as a bispectral index device (BIS, Covidien, USA) to allow anesthesia nociception and depth monitoring respectively.
Procedural sedation will be maintained with propofol using BIS monitoring for a target range of 60-80. All patients will receive oxygen (O2) through nasal cannula with end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) monitoring.
A NOL index monitor will be used to guide analgesic dosage intra-operatively. A NOL \> 25 for 1 minute suggests a high nociceptive response. The anesthesiologist will be allowed to give fentanyl in 25 mcg increments every 3 minutes for a maximum of 2 mcg/kg of adjusted body weight. If the maximum dose of fentanyl has been reached, ketamine 0.25 mg/kg can be given and repeated after 10 minutes. If the patient cannot tolerate the surgical procedure after both doses of ketamine have been given, the anesthesiologist will convert to GA by the method of his/her choice.
The total dose of IV fentanyl and ketamine given intraoperatively will be recorded as primary outcomes. Total dose of IV propofol used for sedation will also be recorded.
For the total duration of the anesthesia, monitoring data will be collected electronically via a computer connected to the monitors as well as on the Drager ventilator system. A logbook will be created to allow standardized data collection regarding the primary and secondary endpoints. Total intraoperative fentanyl and ketamine dosages and total postoperative hydromorphone consumption will be recorded. Postoperative hydromorphone will be given in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) if the Visual Analog Score (VAS) is \> 4/10. Time to meet discharge criteria (Aldrete score \> 9) and the incidence of PONV will also be noted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Thoracic paravertebral block multiple (3) injections
Patients will either be in the sitting or prone position for the block. The block will be performed with the ultrasound transducer in the sagittal position about 2.5 to 3 centimeters (cm) lateral to the spinous process using a caudal to cranial in-plane needle approach. The thoracic vertebral levels will be identified by finding the first rib under ultrasound guidance and counting down levels appropriately.
The needle (80 mm 22-gauge echogenic SonoPlex needle from Pajunk) will be introduced in-plane in a caudal to cranial direction until it punctures the costotransverse ligament. Saline in 1 ml increments will be injected to confirm correct placement of the needle tip. Injection of saline or local anesthetics deep to the costotransverse ligament will lead to an anterior displacement of the parietal pleura.
For the 3-level technique, injections will be done at the levels of T2-T3, T3-T4, and T4-T5 with 10 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% at each level.
Thoracic paravertebral block multiple (3) injections
already described in arm description
Thoracic paravertebral block single injection
Patients will either be in the sitting or prone position for the block. The block will be performed with the ultrasound transducer in the sagittal position about 2.5 to 3 cm lateral to the spinous process using a caudal to cranial in-plane needle approach. The thoracic vertebral levels will be identified by finding the first rib under ultrasound guidance and counting down levels appropriately.
The needle (80 mm 22-gauge Pajunk) will be introduced in-plane in a caudal to cranial direction until it punctures the costotransverse ligament. Saline in 1 ml increments will be injected to confirm correct placement of the needle tip. Injection of saline or local anesthetics deep to the costotransverse ligament will lead to an anterior displacement of the parietal pleura.
For the single-injection technique, injection of 30 ml of ropivacaine 0.5% will be done at the T3-T4 paravertebral space after negative aspiration.
Thoracic paravertebral block single injection
already described in arm description
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thoracic paravertebral block multiple (3) injections
already described in arm description
Thoracic paravertebral block single injection
already described in arm description
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Body mass index (BMI) \> 35
* Body weight under 50 kg
* Obstructive sleep apnea (moderate to severe)
* Unable to communicate with the investigators
* Receiving anticoagulation or experiencing any bleeding disorder
* Known allergy to local anesthetics, fentanyl or hydromorphone
* Active infection at injection sites
* Preexisting neurological deficit or psychiatric illness
* Severe cardiovascular disease
* Liver failure
* Renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate \<15 mL/ min/1.73 m2)
* Pregnancy
* Arrhythmia (NOL monitoring cannot be used reliably)
* Technical inability to proceed with the blocks
* History of chronic pain with daily opioid use during the 3 months before surgery
* Patient refusal
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ariane Clairoux
MD, Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ariane Clairoux, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Île de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-3181
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.