Short-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy With Lymph Node Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer :a Randomized Controlled Study
NCT ID: NCT05707338
Last Updated: 2023-01-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-28
2025-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer(EGC) was first performed more than 20 years ago (Shi, Y et al.,2018). Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for EGC has been confirmed to have oncologic and long-term survival equivalency to the open technique and provide tremendous advantages over open surgery, such as good cosmesis, reduced pain, and shorter hospital stay(Katai H et al.,2017).
Based on the experience of EGC, most experienced surgeons have applied the laparoscopic procedure in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Retrospective studies have assessed the technical and oncological safety of LAG with D2 lymph node dissection for AGC(Hao Y et al .,2016).
Recently, results of two ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have revealed the surgical safety of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC . However, laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced disease remains controversial(Hu Y et al.,2016).
Here, we report the short-term surgical outcomes of a RCT comparing laparoscopic and open gastrectomy (OG) with D2 lymph node dissection for EGC, which was designed to assess the technical safety and oncologic feasibility of LAG for EGC.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for EGC to evaluate technical safety and oncologic feasibility.
The postoperative morbidity and mortality rates will be based on the modified intention-to-treat analysis.
The aim of this study is to compare the operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resections.
Patients and methods
The study design: : prospective randomized comparative clinical trial study analyzing outcomes of gastrectomy for early gastric cancer using laporoscopy versus open approach. This will be a prospective comparative study at Sohag University Hospital, Egypt and National Cancer Institute(NCI), Cairo university ,Egypt.
Patients were divided randomizly into two groups; the first group included patients who will have laparoscopic gastrectomy (Lap group), and the second group included patients will receive open gastrectomy (Open group).
Study population
The study included patients complaining of gastric cancer stage (T1-T2N0M0).The study will start from december 2022 .
Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria were as follows: histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach; pathologically confirmed stage T1-T2; no evidence of distant metastasis by means of abdominal computed tomography(CECT) and CT chest ; D2 lymphadenectomy with curative R0
according to pathological diagnosis after the operation . patients with N1 confirmed pathologically after operation also will be included in the study.
The exclusion criteria:
1. pregnancy
2. an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score \> 3,
3. severe mental disorders
4. prior upper abdominal surgery except laparoscopic cholecystectomy,
5. presence of other malignancies
6. a history of chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
7. unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, severe respiratory disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1 \< 50%)
8. abdominal wall hernia
9. diaphragmatic hernia
10. coagulation disorder
11. portal hypertension
12. Advanced gastric cancer (stage;T3,T4,N1 to 3 ,M1) based on preoperative diagnosis.
Approvals and consents
This study will be done after obtaining approval from the research ethics committee of the Sohag faculty of medicine. A written Informed consent will be obtained from all participants before being enrolled in the study and before performing the procedure after receiving an explanation of the study protocol, including both types of operation and possible complications. The study will be registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Data collection:
Registered data will be collected from the hospital databases, clinical data.
Randomization
Randomization was performed by closed envelopes and was balanced and stratified for proposed type of resection.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
laparoscopic group
Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection
prospective randomized comparative clinical trial study analyzing outcomes of gastrectomy for early gastric cancer using laporoscopy versus open approach. This will be a prospective comparative study at Sohag University Hospital, Egypt and National Cancer Institute(NCI), Cairo university ,Egypt.
Patients were divided randomizly into two groups; the first group included patients who will have laparoscopic gastrectomy (Lap group), and the second group included patients will receive open gastrectomy (Open group).
open group
Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection
prospective randomized comparative clinical trial study analyzing outcomes of gastrectomy for early gastric cancer using laporoscopy versus open approach. This will be a prospective comparative study at Sohag University Hospital, Egypt and National Cancer Institute(NCI), Cairo university ,Egypt.
Patients were divided randomizly into two groups; the first group included patients who will have laparoscopic gastrectomy (Lap group), and the second group included patients will receive open gastrectomy (Open group).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection
prospective randomized comparative clinical trial study analyzing outcomes of gastrectomy for early gastric cancer using laporoscopy versus open approach. This will be a prospective comparative study at Sohag University Hospital, Egypt and National Cancer Institute(NCI), Cairo university ,Egypt.
Patients were divided randomizly into two groups; the first group included patients who will have laparoscopic gastrectomy (Lap group), and the second group included patients will receive open gastrectomy (Open group).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
according to pathological diagnosis after the operation . patients with N1 confirmed pathologically after operation also will be included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score \> 3,
3. severe mental disorders
4. prior upper abdominal surgery except laparoscopic cholecystectomy,
5. presence of other malignancies
6. a history of chemotherapy or radiation therapy.
7. unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, severe respiratory disease (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1 \< 50%)
8. abdominal wall hernia
9. diaphragmatic hernia
10. coagulation disorder
11. portal hypertension
12. Advanced gastric cancer (stage;T3,T4,N1 to 3 ,M1) based on preoperative diagnosis.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mahmoud Nasser Mohamed Ali
assisstant lecturer of general surgery department, Sohag university hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Abdelhafeez H Mohammad, Professor
Role: CONTACT
Phone: 01143013313
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hao Y, Yu P, Qian F, Zhao Y, Shi Y, Tang B, Zeng D, Zhang C. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study in a single minimally invasive surgery center. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(25):e3936. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003936.
Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1350-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa T, Fukagawa T, Terashima M, Misawa K, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Fukushima N, Yasuda T, Asao Y, Fujiwara Y, Sasako M. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jul;20(4):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0646-9. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
Shi Y, Xu X, Zhao Y, Qian F, Tang B, Hao Y, Luo H, Chen J, Yu P. Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2427-2433. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5942-x. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh-Med-23-01-16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id