Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-31
2027-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This proposal seeks to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a new care model for the underserved PWE in a public health setting. In this new model, neurologists guided by standardized treatment algorithms (ACC-ASCVD estimator+) propose and initiate pharmacological interventions for hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Late-Onset Seizures: Trial of Vascular Risk Investigation and Treatment
NCT07116330
Study Of The Safety And Efficacy Of Lyrica In The Treatment Of Newly Diagnosed Partial Epilepsy
NCT00280059
Antiepileptic Drugs and Vascular Risk Markers
NCT00774306
Vision Testing in Patients With Partial Seizures Receiving Either Lyrica or Placebo
NCT00351611
An Open-Label Extension Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of the Investigational Compound RWJ-333369 in Patients With Epilepsy
NCT00210522
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
PWE on Medicaid, Medi-Cal and without insurance are more likely to experience delays to treatment and follow aberrant care pathways. Unexpected seizures and status epilepticus often result in transport to community and public health hospitals, where they are referred to neurology clinics, a process which may bypass primary care. As a result, PWE may have as their primary point of contact neurologists who traditionally do no monitor or treat hypertension or hyperlipidemia. This leads to gaps in care and missed opportunities to reduce CV risk.
This proposal seeks to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a new care model for the underserved PWE in a public health setting. In this new model, neurologists guided by standardized treatment algorithms (ACC-ASCVD estimator+) propose and initiate pharmacological interventions for hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
We propose enrolling 150 subjects ages 40-79 with untreated or incompletely treated hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia. Subjects will be randomized 2:1 to Neurologist-initiated treatment (Model 1) versus usual care (Model 2). Subjects will be evaluated for blood pressure, blood chemistries, lipids, and HgA1C at baseline, one and three months. At 3-months, subjects randomized to usual care (Model 2) will be offered treatment if not yet initiated by primary care. If successful, results of this pilot study will provide needed feasibility and preliminary efficacy data for a large multicenter randomized trial of Neurologist initiated treatment of cardiovascular risk in the underserved with epilepsy
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Model 1-Neurologist Initiation of Treatment for Hypertension or Hyperlipidemia
Neurologist Initiation of antihypertensive or treatment for hyperlipidemia
Neurologist Initiated Treatment
Neurologist Initiated Treatment for Hypertension or Hyperlipidemia
Model 2-Usual Care
Usual care
Placebo
Usual care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neurologist Initiated Treatment
Neurologist Initiated Treatment for Hypertension or Hyperlipidemia
Placebo
Usual care
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 40-79 (age range defined by ACC-ASCVD risk estimator+)
* Untreated HTN defined as at least two sitting BPs \> 130/80 in the last year prior to enrollment or on enrollment
* Hyperlipidemia defined as LDL \> 70 mg/dl with 10-year ACC-ASCVD score \> 7.5% or total LDL \> 190, or ASCVD recommendation to initiate lipid lowering agent
* Intellectual Disability, developmental disorder or autism recorded in the electronic medical record (ICD-10 codes F70-F79, F84)
Exclusion Criteria
* Documented poor compliance with treatment
* If intellectually disabled, if there is no caregiver to support or initiate therapy
* Pregnancy or person actively trying to become pregnant
* Blood Pressure \> 180/110
* Known secondary cause of hypertension that causes concern regarding safety of the protocol.
* Arm circumference too large or small to allow accurate blood pressure measurement with available devices
* Diabetes mellitus,
* Glomerulonephritis treated with or likely to be treated with immunosuppressive therapy
* eGFR \< 20 ml/min /1.73m2 or end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
* Cardiovascular event, procedure or hospitalization for unstable angina within last 3 months
* Symptomatic heart failure within the past 6 months
* A medical condition likely to limit survival to less than 3 years or a malignancy other than non-melanoma skin cancer within the last 2 years
* Any factors judged by the clinic team to be likely to limit adherence to interventions.
* Failure to obtain informed consent from participant
* Any organ transplant
40 Years
79 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute
OTHER
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christopher Degiorgio, MD FAAN
Professor of Neurology in Residence
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christopher M DeGiorgio, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Los Angeles
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMD01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.