123 I-FP-CIT SPECT Prescriptions for Parkinsonian Syndromes

NCT ID: NCT05698784

Last Updated: 2023-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

723 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-30

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

123I-FP-CIT SPECT (DaTSCAN®) allows to detect presynaptic dopamine neuronal denervation. It is recommended to differentiate neurodegenerative parkinsonism from secondary parkinsonian syndromes or from essential tremor, and to distinguish patients with suspected dementia with Lewy bodies and those with other subtypes of dementia. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relevance of 123I-FP-CIT SPECT prescriptions, the profile of prescribers and the evolution of the prescription rate over a ten-year period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

the investigators included 723 patients in this retrospective study between February 2009 and May 2019, in the nuclear medicine Department of Avicenne University Hospital. No patients were excluded. Demographic, clinical, brain imaging, and 123I-FP-CIT SPECT data were collected from medical records. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (CLEA-2019-75).

Regarding the relevance of the indications, the investigators have defined three groups: " inappropriate ", "uncertain " and " relevant ", also respectively named (a), (b) and (c) groups.

In the "inappropriate" group (a), the investigators placed prescriptions with no indication, 123I-FP-CIT SPECT requested to confirm a PS clinically evident, and those prescribed for isolated cognitive-behavioral disturbances with no PS or differential diagnosis mentioned.

In the "uncertain" group (b), the investigators did not have sufficient data to determine with certainty whether this was an inappropriate or relevant indication.

In the "relevant" group (c), the prescriptions concerned the differential diagnosis between neurodegenerative parkinsonism and secondary parkinsonian syndromes (for instance post-neuroleptics) or other doubtful disorders (Alzheimer's disease, essential tremor), clinically uncertain PS (such as an isolated asymmetric resting tremor without akinesia or lead-pipe rigidity) and PD of atypical evolution.

Data were presented as mean (standard deviation) for numeric variables and as count (percentage) for categorical variables. To compare demographic, clinical and paraclinical data, and the distribution of prescribers between the three groups (i.e. inappropriate (a), uncertain (b) and relevant (c)), one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for numerical variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. To identify which groups differed from each other, post hoc comparisons were made using the Tukey test for numeric variables and the Fisher pairwise exact test followed by the Benjamini-Hochberg correction to account for multiple testing, for categorical variables. For all tests, the significance level was set at p \< 0.05. All data were analyzed using R software (version 3.6.1, R Core Team).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group a "inappropriate"

In the "inappropriate" , we placed prescriptions with no indication, 123I-FP-CIT SPECT

No interventions assigned to this group

Group b "uncertain"

In the "uncertain", we did not have sufficient data to determine with certainty whether this was an inappropriate or relevant indication.

No interventions assigned to this group

Group c "relevant"

In the "relevant" , the prescriptions concerned the differential diagnosis between neurodegenerative parkinsonism and secondary parkinsonian syndromes

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Parkinsonian patients who benefited from a 123I-FP-CIT SPECT
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Guadeloupe

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bertrand DEGOS, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hopital Avicenne

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Avicenne

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLEA-2019-75

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.