123 I-FP-CIT SPECT Prescriptions for Parkinsonian Syndromes
NCT ID: NCT05698784
Last Updated: 2023-02-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
723 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-06-30
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DaTSCAN Brain Scintigraphy and Psychotropic Treatments: Influence on Radiotracer Binding
NCT05683665
A Study to Assess Changes in Clinical Management After DaTSCAN Imaging of Subjects With Clinically Uncertain Parkinsonism or an Illness With Similar Symptoms
NCT00382967
Long-Term Dopamine Transporter Imaging and Clinical Assessment of Parkinson's Disease Progression
NCT00134784
Detecting Dopaminergic Deficits in Individuals At-risk for Parkinsonism
NCT01358474
Dopaminergic Loss and Pain in Parkinson's Disease
NCT00940914
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Regarding the relevance of the indications, the investigators have defined three groups: " inappropriate ", "uncertain " and " relevant ", also respectively named (a), (b) and (c) groups.
In the "inappropriate" group (a), the investigators placed prescriptions with no indication, 123I-FP-CIT SPECT requested to confirm a PS clinically evident, and those prescribed for isolated cognitive-behavioral disturbances with no PS or differential diagnosis mentioned.
In the "uncertain" group (b), the investigators did not have sufficient data to determine with certainty whether this was an inappropriate or relevant indication.
In the "relevant" group (c), the prescriptions concerned the differential diagnosis between neurodegenerative parkinsonism and secondary parkinsonian syndromes (for instance post-neuroleptics) or other doubtful disorders (Alzheimer's disease, essential tremor), clinically uncertain PS (such as an isolated asymmetric resting tremor without akinesia or lead-pipe rigidity) and PD of atypical evolution.
Data were presented as mean (standard deviation) for numeric variables and as count (percentage) for categorical variables. To compare demographic, clinical and paraclinical data, and the distribution of prescribers between the three groups (i.e. inappropriate (a), uncertain (b) and relevant (c)), one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for numerical variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. To identify which groups differed from each other, post hoc comparisons were made using the Tukey test for numeric variables and the Fisher pairwise exact test followed by the Benjamini-Hochberg correction to account for multiple testing, for categorical variables. For all tests, the significance level was set at p \< 0.05. All data were analyzed using R software (version 3.6.1, R Core Team).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group a "inappropriate"
In the "inappropriate" , we placed prescriptions with no indication, 123I-FP-CIT SPECT
No interventions assigned to this group
Group b "uncertain"
In the "uncertain", we did not have sufficient data to determine with certainty whether this was an inappropriate or relevant indication.
No interventions assigned to this group
Group c "relevant"
In the "relevant" , the prescriptions concerned the differential diagnosis between neurodegenerative parkinsonism and secondary parkinsonian syndromes
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Guadeloupe
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bertrand DEGOS, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hopital Avicenne
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Avicenne
Bobigny, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLEA-2019-75
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.