Trial Outcomes & Findings for Predicting Peanut Anaphylaxis and Reducing Epinephrine (NCT NCT05696236)

NCT ID: NCT05696236

Last Updated: 2025-08-19

Results Overview

Any Brighton Level 1, 2, or 3 anaphylaxis. The Brighton Level is a system for classifying the severity and diagnostic certainty of anaphylaxis cases, particularly in the context of adverse events following immunization. Results reflect the number of participants who experienced any of the Brighton Level 1, 2, or 3 anaphylaxis events.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

51 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)

Results posted on

2025-08-19

Participant Flow

Prior to randomization, 3 participants were screen fails and 2 were lost to follow up.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures. Monitor (TEWL) without stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.
Overall Study
STARTED
21
25
Overall Study
COMPLETED
18
22
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures. Monitor (TEWL) without stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
0
Overall Study
Later determined to not be eligible for participation
0
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
2
2

Baseline Characteristics

Predicting Peanut Anaphylaxis and Reducing Epinephrine

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules
n=21 Participants
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules
n=25 Participants
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures. Monitor (TEWL) without stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.
Total
n=46 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
34 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2 • n=93 Participants
29 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=4 Participants
31 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
27 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants
n=93 Participants
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
44 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants
n=93 Participants
23 Participants
n=4 Participants
41 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 Participants
n=93 Participants
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
46 Participants
n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)

Population: 6 participants ended their participation in the trial before their data was collectible.

Any Brighton Level 1, 2, or 3 anaphylaxis. The Brighton Level is a system for classifying the severity and diagnostic certainty of anaphylaxis cases, particularly in the context of adverse events following immunization. Results reflect the number of participants who experienced any of the Brighton Level 1, 2, or 3 anaphylaxis events.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules
n=18 Participants
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules
n=22 Participants
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures. Monitor (TEWL) without stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.
Anaphylaxis Occurrence Rates in Each Group
9 Participants
10 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)

Population: 6 participants ended their participation in the trial before their data was collectible.

Results reflect the number of participants who experienced any objective symptom of allergic reaction (e.g., hives, angioedema, vomiting, wheeze, etc) not rising to the definition of anaphylaxis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules
n=18 Participants
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules
n=22 Participants
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures. Monitor (TEWL) without stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.
Reaction Rates in Each Group
16 Participants
14 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)

Population: 6 participants ended their participation in the trial before their data was collectible.

Anaphylaxis severity was graded on a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 = mild, 5 = death)) according to criteria set forth in the Consortium for Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules
n=18 Participants
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules
n=22 Participants
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures. Monitor (TEWL) without stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.
Anaphylaxis Severity in Each Group
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Approximately 4-6 hours (Day 1 during the food challenge)

Population: 6 participants ended their participation in the trial before their data was collectible.

The Brighton score was a 1-3 score of anaphylaxis likelihood. Participants were categorized based on level of anaphylaxis likelihood: Not Applicable (no reaction), Brighton Level 1 (most likely), Brighton Level 2 (medium likelihood), Brighton Level 3 (least likely), Unclassified (reaction present, but with insufficient symptoms for participant's reaction to be classified)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules
n=18 Participants
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules
n=22 Participants
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures. Monitor (TEWL) without stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.
Anaphylaxis Likelihood in Each Group Based on the Brighton Score
Not Applicable
3 Participants
8 Participants
Anaphylaxis Likelihood in Each Group Based on the Brighton Score
Brighton Level 1
3 Participants
2 Participants
Anaphylaxis Likelihood in Each Group Based on the Brighton Score
Brighton Level 2
4 Participants
7 Participants
Anaphylaxis Likelihood in Each Group Based on the Brighton Score
Brighton Level 3
2 Participants
1 Participants
Anaphylaxis Likelihood in Each Group Based on the Brighton Score
Unclassified
6 Participants
4 Participants

Adverse Events

Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 16 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Monitor (TEWL) and Stopping Rules
n=18 participants at risk
Wears the monitor, and the food challenge will be done using the new stopping rules to end the test. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) monitor and stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will also be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers. If they numbers match the stopping rules, they will tell the doctor and the oral food challenge will be over.
Monitor (TWLG) Without Stopping Rules
n=22 participants at risk
Wears the monitor, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the food challenge. The food challenge will be done following standard oral food challenge procedures. Monitor (TEWL) without stopping rules: The oral food challenge will be done as usual, and participants will wear the TEWL monitor. The research food allergy nurse and doctor will be looking for signs and symptoms of an allergic reaction. The research study coordinator will be watching the TEWL numbers, but the stopping rules will not be used to end the oral food challenge.
Immune system disorders
Allergic Reaction
88.9%
16/18 • 24 hours
63.6%
14/22 • 24 hours

Additional Information

Charles Schuler

University of Michigan

Phone: 734-232-2154

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place