The Effect of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulıtıs Treatment
NCT ID: NCT05678140
Last Updated: 2024-08-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-20
2023-09-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Low-intensity Laser Effects in Adhesive Capsulitis
NCT05689593
Acute Effect of Resistance Exercise, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, and Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation Applications on Muscle Activation
NCT06016660
Investigation of Acute Effect of ESWT and ESWT+KT on Pain and Grip Strength
NCT03763513
Bowen Technique Versus Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
NCT07047846
Short and Long Term Effects of IASTM and ESWT Therapy in Individuals With Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT05683275
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is characterized by shoulder pain, decreased range of motion, and limitation of function. This affects the function of the entire upper extremity. Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis usually involves the non-dominant upper extremity, with bilateral involvement in 40-50% of cases. It is more common in women between the ages of 40 and 60. The incidence of adhesive capsulitis among the population is between 3% and 5%. It has been reported with up to 20% higher incidence in the diabetic population. It is also associated with other pathological disorders such as thyroid dysfunction, coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular disease. Although the pathology is self-limiting, long-term symptoms develop in approximately 20% to 50% of cases.
Adhesive capsulitis progression is characterized by four stages, each stage presenting a distinctive clinical picture.
1. The painful phase lasts less than three months and presents with shoulder pain at night when glenohumeral movement is preserved.
2. The freezing process lasts three to nine months and is manifested by severe pain and stiffness in the glenohumeral joint.
3. The frozen shoulder process lasts nine to fourteen months and is eventually characterized by loss of motion and pain in all directions.
4. The resolution phase lasts for fifteen to twenty-four months and is characterized by persistent stiffness, minimal pain, and delayed improvement in shoulder motion.
Abnormal shoulder kinematics develops in response to the lack of extensibility of the capsule with the change in motor patterns in the central nervous system. Increased thoracic kyphosis can be seen as postural deviations. However, fibrotic changes are also seen in the periarticular connective tissue and trigger points. This presents as a higher level of disability with painful shoulder. Physiotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for patients with adhesive capsulitis. Joint mobilization has a proven role in conjunction with Codman's exercises. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), Diathermy is used in the treatment to reduce pain. Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) is a soft tissue mobilization method that works by generating localized inflammation and facilitates collagen synthesis and realignment. In fact, when IASTM is given to soft tissues with appropriate pressure, localized inflammation occurs with microvascular bleeding. This will increase blood flow to the injured area along with the recruitment of more fibroblasts. With the removal of scar tissues and adhesions, healing will be supported by the organization of collagen of fibroblasts. The fibronectin induced by IASTM is required for tissue repair. A localized force will be transmitted through an instrument to the affected tissues to leave a scar.
IASTM has become increasingly popular as a tool for the rehabilitation of sports injuries. It has been proven to be successful in a short time in reducing pain and increasing mobility after sports injuries. There are studies showing an increase in ROM after a single application of this technique.
It is known that it takes a long time to relieve pain and achieve a good improvement in ROM in adhesive capsulitis. This affects their quality of life and creates the need for treatment options that provide a shorter recovery time. Various conservative protocols are followed with physical therapy as the main treatment in adhesive capsulitis. Few studies have used IASTM as a treatment to evaluate its effect on adhesive capsulitis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
soft tissue mobilization+conventional physical therapy
Hot-pack to warm the superficial tissue, TENS for pain relief, ultrasound (US) to warm the joint structures before mobilization techniques, ROM, stretching, and isometric strengthening exercises to restore joint mobility and function of the shoulder area soft tissue mobilization; For the shoulder area, the application will take between 3-5 minutes. Instrumental Soft tissue mobilization will be performed while the participant is sitting in a supported chair, parallel to the shoulder and scapular muscle fibers and at an angle of 45 degrees to the vertical. Patients will be told that there may be small red spots called petechiae in the treated area. The application will be made using Graston iron rods.
soft tissue mobilization
soft tissue mobilization; For the shoulder area, the application will take between 3-5 minutes. Instrumental Soft tissue mobilization will be performed while the participant is sitting in a supported chair, parallel to the shoulder and scapular muscle fibers and at an angle of 45 degrees to the vertical. Patients will be told that there may be small red spots called petechiae in the treated area. The application will be made using Graston iron rods.
conventional physical therapy
Hot-pack to warm the superficial tissue, TENS for pain relief, ultrasound (US) to warm the joint structures before mobilization techniques, ROM, stretching, and isometric strengthening exercises to restore joint mobility and function of the shoulder area
conventional physical therapy
Hot-pack to warm the superficial tissue, TENS for pain relief, ultrasound to warm the joint structures before mobilization techniques, ROM, stretching, and isometric strengthening exercises to restore joint mobility and function of the shoulder area.
conventional physical therapy
Hot-pack to warm the superficial tissue, TENS for pain relief, ultrasound (US) to warm the joint structures before mobilization techniques, ROM, stretching, and isometric strengthening exercises to restore joint mobility and function of the shoulder area
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
soft tissue mobilization
soft tissue mobilization; For the shoulder area, the application will take between 3-5 minutes. Instrumental Soft tissue mobilization will be performed while the participant is sitting in a supported chair, parallel to the shoulder and scapular muscle fibers and at an angle of 45 degrees to the vertical. Patients will be told that there may be small red spots called petechiae in the treated area. The application will be made using Graston iron rods.
conventional physical therapy
Hot-pack to warm the superficial tissue, TENS for pain relief, ultrasound (US) to warm the joint structures before mobilization techniques, ROM, stretching, and isometric strengthening exercises to restore joint mobility and function of the shoulder area
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
3\. consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Basak Cigdem Karacay
Assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Basak Cigdem Karacay, Assoc. Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Medicine
Kırşehir, City Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Aggarwal A, Saxena K, Palekar TJ, Rathi M. Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization in adhesive capsulitis: A randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:435-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.039. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
Laudner K, Compton BD, McLoda TA, Walters CM. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for improving posterior shoulder range of motion in collegiate baseball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Feb;9(1):1-7.
Hussey MJ, Boron-Magulick AE, Valovich McLeod TC, Welch Bacon CE. The Comparison of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Self-Stretch Measures to Increase Shoulder Range of Motion in Overhead Athletes: A Critically Appraised Topic. J Sport Rehabil. 2018 Jul 1;27(4):385-389. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2016-0213. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E-77504701-604.-02.
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.