A Study of QBECO Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer That Has Spread to the Liver
NCT ID: NCT05677113
Last Updated: 2025-01-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
115 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-30
2030-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study of Encorafenib Plus Cetuximab With or Without Chemotherapy in People With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT04607421
A Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of LBL-007 Plus Tislelizumab in Combination With Bevacizumab Plus Fluoropyrimidine Versus Bevacizumab Plus Fluoropyrimidine in Participants With Unresectable or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT05609370
Celecoxib, Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b, and Rintatolimod in Treating Patients With Colorectal Cancer Metastatic to the Liver
NCT03403634
Colorectal Cancer Treated With Adjuvant Regorafenib Versus Placebo After Curative Treatment of Liver Metastases in a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase-III STudy
NCT01939223
Evaluating ABX-EGF Extended Therapy in Subjects With MetastaticColorectal Cancer
NCT00113776
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine if QBECO administered perioperatively can improve 2-year Progression-Free Survival in adult patients undergoing resection of CRLMs for complete clearance of metastatic disease. The main secondary objectives will be to:
1. Determine the effect of QBECO on the frequency and kinetics of clearance (and recurrence) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the postoperative period and further evaluate the use ctDNA as part of ongoing surveillance.
2. Determine the side-effect profile of perioperative QBECO.
3. Determine the effect of QBECO on 5-year overall survival
Approximately 115 participants will be randomized to receive a placebo or the investigational product, QBECO. QBECO or placebo will be administered according to the following regimen: 0.1mL subcutaneous injections every two days for 11-120 days preoperatively, and 41 days postoperatively. Participants will be followed for 5 years after surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
QBECO
QBECO is an SSI formulated from inactivated E. coli bacteria that is specifically designed to target pathologies of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and related organs, such as the liver. This trial will test the hypothesis that in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), perioperative treatment with QBECO will attenuate the postoperative immune suppression and will improve progression-free survival (PFS).
QBECO
QBECO is a site specific immunomodulator (SSI) designed to promote innate immune responses in the gastrointestinal tract and related organs, including the liver. QBECO will be administered according to the following regimen: 0.1mL self-administered subcutaneous injections every 2 days for 11-120 days preoperatively, and 41 days postoperatively.
Placebo
A placebo is a liquid that looks like the study drug, but contains no medication.
Placebo
Placebo will be prepared in the same way as the IP. Placebo will be administered according to the following regimen: 0.1mL self-administered subcutaneous injections every 2 days for 11-120 days preoperatively, and 41 days postoperatively.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
QBECO
QBECO is a site specific immunomodulator (SSI) designed to promote innate immune responses in the gastrointestinal tract and related organs, including the liver. QBECO will be administered according to the following regimen: 0.1mL self-administered subcutaneous injections every 2 days for 11-120 days preoperatively, and 41 days postoperatively.
Placebo
Placebo will be prepared in the same way as the IP. Placebo will be administered according to the following regimen: 0.1mL self-administered subcutaneous injections every 2 days for 11-120 days preoperatively, and 41 days postoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pathologic diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma with clinical diagnosis of liver metastases
* Planned to undergo resection of liver lesions for complete clearance of all visible metastatic disease. This will include those who may undergo synchronous resection of the primary colorectal cancer and/or those who may receive a combination of surgery and ablation to treat all lesions.
* Computerized Tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with intravenous (IV) contrast within 6 weeks prior to enrollment.
* MRI of the liver within 6 weeks prior to enrollment OR within 6 weeks prior to starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (for patients treated with chemotherapy).
* Planned to receive the last dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy at least 25 days prior to surgery (for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy).
* Agree to comply with the contraceptive requirements of the protocol when applicable
* Willing and able to either perform subcutaneous injections according to the study protocol, or receive the injections from a caregiver delegated by the participant.
* Able to provide informed consent or has a substitute decision maker capable of providing consent on their behalf.
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior hepatic arterial infusion or embolization. Prior portal vein embolization, ablation, or liver resection are permitted.
* Patients with any invasive cancer history other than colorectal cancer in the last 5 years. In situ disease (e.g., melanoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast) or non melanoma skin cancers are permitted.
* Patients with a documented history of clinically severe autoimmune disease or a syndrome that requires systemic steroids or immunosuppressive agents. This includes patient requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (\> 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent, or depot corticosteroids in the 6 weeks before enrollment) or immunosuppressant drugs (such as azathioprine, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, etc.) within the 14 days prior to enrollment or a reasonable expectation that the patient may require such treatment during the course of the study. Inhaled or topical or inter-articular steroids, and adrenal replacement steroid doses ≤ 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent, are permitted in the absence of active autoimmune disease. Steroids used for premedication prior to chemotherapy or as part of a chemotherapy regimen are allowed.
* Patients with known active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C infections.
* Pregnant patients or those who are nursing an infant
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hamilton Health Science Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Health Science Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tsuchiya Y, Sawada S, Yoshioka I, Ohashi Y, Matsuo M, Harimaya Y, Tsukada K, Saiki I. Increased surgical stress promotes tumor metastasis. Surgery. 2003 May;133(5):547-55. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.141.
Tai LH, Zhang J, Scott KJ, de Souza CT, Alkayyal AA, Ananth AA, Sahi S, Adair RA, Mahmoud AB, Sad S, Bell JC, Makrigiannis AP, Melcher AA, Auer RC. Perioperative influenza vaccination reduces postoperative metastatic disease by reversing surgery-induced dysfunction in natural killer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Sep 15;19(18):5104-15. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0246. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
Tai LH, Alkayyal AA, Leslie AL, Sahi S, Bennett S, Tanese de Souza C, Baxter K, Angka L, Xu R, Kennedy MA, Auer RC. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition reduces postoperative metastatic disease by targeting surgery-induced myeloid derived suppressor cell-dependent inhibition of Natural Killer cell cytotoxicity. Oncoimmunology. 2018 Mar 1;7(6):e1431082. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1431082. eCollection 2018.
Tai LH, de Souza CT, Belanger S, Ly L, Alkayyal AA, Zhang J, Rintoul JL, Ananth AA, Lam T, Breitbach CJ, Falls TJ, Kirn DH, Bell JC, Makrigiannis AP, Auer RA. Preventing postoperative metastatic disease by inhibiting surgery-induced dysfunction in natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 2013 Jan 1;73(1):97-107. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-1993. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
Seth R, Tai LH, Falls T, de Souza CT, Bell JC, Carrier M, Atkins H, Boushey R, Auer RA. Surgical stress promotes the development of cancer metastases by a coagulation-dependent mechanism involving natural killer cells in a murine model. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):158-68. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826fcbdb.
Ananth AA, Tai LH, Lansdell C, Alkayyal AA, Baxter KE, Angka L, Zhang J, Tanese de Souza C, Stephenson KB, Parato K, Bramson JL, Bell JC, Lichty BD, Auer RC. Surgical Stress Abrogates Pre-Existing Protective T Cell Mediated Anti-Tumor Immunity Leading to Postoperative Cancer Recurrence. PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155947. eCollection 2016.
Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017 Jan;5(1):3-8. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0297.
Manz MG, Boettcher S. Emergency granulopoiesis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014 May;14(5):302-14. doi: 10.1038/nri3660. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
Angka L, Martel AB, Kilgour M, Jeong A, Sadiq M, de Souza CT, Baker L, Kennedy MA, Kekre N, Auer RC. Natural Killer Cell IFNgamma Secretion is Profoundly Suppressed Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3747-3754. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6691-3. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
Zhang J, Tai LH, Ilkow CS, Alkayyal AA, Ananth AA, de Souza CT, Wang J, Sahi S, Ly L, Lefebvre C, Falls TJ, Stephenson KB, Mahmoud AB, Makrigiannis AP, Lichty BD, Bell JC, Stojdl DF, Auer RC. Maraba MG1 virus enhances natural killer cell function via conventional dendritic cells to reduce postoperative metastatic disease. Mol Ther. 2014 Jul;22(7):1320-1332. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.60. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
Mitroulis I, Ruppova K, Wang B, Chen LS, Grzybek M, Grinenko T, Eugster A, Troullinaki M, Palladini A, Kourtzelis I, Chatzigeorgiou A, Schlitzer A, Beyer M, Joosten LAB, Isermann B, Lesche M, Petzold A, Simons K, Henry I, Dahl A, Schultze JL, Wielockx B, Zamboni N, Mirtschink P, Coskun U, Hajishengallis G, Netea MG, Chavakis T. Modulation of Myelopoiesis Progenitors Is an Integral Component of Trained Immunity. Cell. 2018 Jan 11;172(1-2):147-161.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.034.
Kaufmann E, Sanz J, Dunn JL, Khan N, Mendonca LE, Pacis A, Tzelepis F, Pernet E, Dumaine A, Grenier JC, Mailhot-Leonard F, Ahmed E, Belle J, Besla R, Mazer B, King IL, Nijnik A, Robbins CS, Barreiro LB, Divangahi M. BCG Educates Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Generate Protective Innate Immunity against Tuberculosis. Cell. 2018 Jan 11;172(1-2):176-190.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.031.
Netea MG, Joosten LAB, van der Meer JWM. Hypothesis: stimulation of trained immunity as adjunctive immunotherapy in cancer. J Leukoc Biol. 2017 Dec;102(6):1323-1332. doi: 10.1189/jlb.5RI0217-064RR. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
Bazett M, Costa AM, Bosiljcic M, Anderson RM, Alexander MP, Wong SWY, Dhanji S, Chen JM, Pankovich J, Lam S, Sutcliffe S, Gunn H, Kalyan S, Mullins DW. Harnessing innate lung anti-cancer effector functions with a novel bacterial-derived immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2017 Nov 27;7(3):e1398875. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1398875. eCollection 2018.
Kalyan S, Bazett M, Sham HP, Bosiljcic M, Luk B, Dhanji S, Costa AM, Wong SWY, Netea MG, Mullins DW, Gunn H. Distinct inactivated bacterial-based immune modulators vary in their therapeutic efficacies for treating disease based on the organ site of pathology. Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62735-z.
Faraj TA, McLaughlin CL, Erridge C. Host defenses against metabolic endotoxaemia and their impact on lipopolysaccharide detection. Int Rev Immunol. 2017 May 4;36(3):125-144. doi: 10.1080/08830185.2017.1280483. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Sham HP, Bazett M, Bosiljcic M, Yang H, Luk B, Law HT, Morampudi V, Yu HB, Pankovich J, Sutcliffe S, Bressler B, Marshall JK, Fedorak RN, Chen J, Jones M, Gunn H, Kalyan S, Vallance BA. Immune Stimulation Using a Gut Microbe-Based Immunotherapy Reduces Disease Pathology and Improves Barrier Function in Ulcerative Colitis. Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 27;9:2211. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02211. eCollection 2018.
Sutcliffe S, Kalyan S, Pankovich J, Chen JMH, Gluck R, Thompson D, Bosiljcic M, Bazett M, Fedorak RN, Panaccione R, Axler J, Marshall JK, Mullins DW, Kabakchiev B, McGovern DPB, Jang J, Coldman A, Vandermeirsch G, Bressler B, Gunn H. Novel Microbial-Based Immunotherapy Approach for Crohn's Disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jul 19;6:170. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00170. eCollection 2019.
Hackl C, Neumann P, Gerken M, Loss M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Schlitt HJ. Treatment of colorectal liver metastases in Germany: a ten-year population-based analysis of 5772 cases of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014 Nov 4;14:810. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-810.
Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):254-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217629.94941.cf.
Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Stromberg C, Jonas E, Freedman J. Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 15;18(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3925-x.
Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, Poston GJ, Schlag PM, Rougier P, Bechstein WO, Primrose JN, Walpole ET, Finch-Jones M, Jaeck D, Mirza D, Parks RW, Collette L, Praet M, Bethe U, Van Cutsem E, Scheithauer W, Gruenberger T; EORTC Gastro-Intestinal Tract Cancer Group; Cancer Research UK; Arbeitsgruppe Lebermetastasen und-tumoren in der Chirurgischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft Onkologie (ALM-CAO); Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG); Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive (FFCD). Perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC Intergroup trial 40983): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008 Mar 22;371(9617):1007-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60455-9.
Portier G, Elias D, Bouche O, Rougier P, Bosset JF, Saric J, Belghiti J, Piedbois P, Guimbaud R, Nordlinger B, Bugat R, Lazorthes F, Bedenne L. Multicenter randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 1;24(31):4976-82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8353.
Kanemitsu Y, Shimizu Y, Mizusawa J, Inaba Y, Hamaguchi T, Shida D, Ohue M, Komori K, Shiomi A, Shiozawa M, Watanabe J, Suto T, Kinugasa Y, Takii Y, Bando H, Kobatake T, Inomata M, Shimada Y, Katayama H, Fukuda H; JCOG Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Hepatectomy Followed by mFOLFOX6 Versus Hepatectomy Alone for Liver-Only Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (JCOG0603): A Phase II or III Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;39(34):3789-3799. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01032. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
Oxnard GR, Paweletz CP, Kuang Y, Mach SL, O'Connell A, Messineo MM, Luke JJ, Butaney M, Kirschmeier P, Jackman DM, Janne PA. Noninvasive detection of response and resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer using quantitative next-generation genotyping of cell-free plasma DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Mar 15;20(6):1698-1705. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2482. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
Goldberg SB, Narayan A, Kole AJ, Decker RH, Teysir J, Carriero NJ, Lee A, Nemati R, Nath SK, Mane SM, Deng Y, Sukumar N, Zelterman D, Boffa DJ, Politi K, Gettinger SN, Wilson LD, Herbst RS, Patel AA. Early Assessment of Lung Cancer Immunotherapy Response via Circulating Tumor DNA. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Apr 15;24(8):1872-1880. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1341. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Buchler MW, Weitz J. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 2011 May;149(5):680-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R, Koch M, Makuuchi M, Dematteo RP, Christophi C, Banting S, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Yokoyama Y, Fan ST, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Capussotti L, Buchler MW, Weitz J. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011 May;149(5):713-24. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.001. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
Leslie K, Troedel S, Irwin K, Pearce F, Ugoni A, Gillies R, Pemberton E, Dharmage S. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2003 Nov;99(5):1158-65. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200311000-00024.
Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
Shida D, Wakamatsu K, Tanaka Y, Yoshimura A, Kawaguchi M, Miyamoto S, Tagawa K. The postoperative patient-reported quality of recovery in colorectal cancer patients under enhanced recovery after surgery using QoR-40. BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 26;15:799. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1799-3.
Peng LH, Wang WJ, Chen J, Jin JY, Min S, Qin PP. Implementation of the pre-operative rehabilitation recovery protocol and its effect on the quality of recovery after colorectal surgeries. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Nov 3;134(23):2865-2873. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001709.
Lee JH, Kim D, Seo D, Son JS, Kim DC. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Dec;71(6):467-475. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.27188. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
Tanaka Y, Wakita T, Fukuhara S, Nishiwada M, Inoue S, Kawaguchi M, Furuya H. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40. J Anesth. 2011 Aug;25(4):509-15. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1151-2. Epub 2011 May 31.
McMillan DC, Crozier JE, Canna K, Angerson WJ, McArdle CS. Evaluation of an inflammation-based prognostic score (GPS) in patients undergoing resection for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Aug;22(8):881-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0259-6. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
Shrotriya S, Walsh D, Bennani-Baiti N, Thomas S, Lorton C. C-Reactive Protein Is an Important Biomarker for Prognosis Tumor Recurrence and Treatment Response in Adult Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0143080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143080. eCollection 2015.
Fruhling P, Hellberg K, Ejder P, Stromberg C, Urdzik J, Isaksson B. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and albumin in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. A retrospective cohort study. HPB (Oxford). 2021 Jun;23(6):970-978. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
Punt CJ, Buyse M, Kohne CH, Hohenberger P, Labianca R, Schmoll HJ, Pahlman L, Sobrero A, Douillard JY. Endpoints in adjuvant treatment trials: a systematic review of the literature in colon cancer and proposed definitions for future trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jul 4;99(13):998-1003. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm024. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
Karanicolas PJ, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M. Practical tips for surgical research: blinding: who, what, when, why, how? Can J Surg. 2010 Oct;53(5):345-8. No abstract available.
Tsai MS, Su YH, Ho MC, Liang JT, Chen TP, Lai HS, Lee PH. Clinicopathological features and prognosis in resectable synchronous and metachronous colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):786-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9215-5. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
Lochan R, White SA, Manas DM. Liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis. Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul;16(1):33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
Bismuth H, Chiche L. Surgery of hepatic tumors. Prog Liver Dis. 1993;11:269-85. No abstract available.
Soules MR, Sherman S, Parrott E, Rebar R, Santoro N, Utian W, Woods N. Executive summary: Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop (STRAW). Climacteric. 2001 Dec;4(4):267-72.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.