Upper Extremity Versus Lower Extremity Accessory Access Sites During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

NCT ID: NCT05672823

Last Updated: 2024-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

238 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-28

Study Completion Date

2023-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial is to assess the safety and efficacy of a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach versus the standard 'lower extremity' approach for accessory access sites in patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

The main questions it aims to answer are whether a 'minimally invasive, upper extremity' approach as compared with the standard 'lower extremity' approach:

* Is associated with less clinically relevant access site-related bleeding complications.
* Is associated with a shorter time to mobilization after TAVI.
* Is associated with a shorter duration of hospitalization.
* Has the same early safety outcomes at 30 days post-TAVI.

Participants will be subject to the usual care surrounding a TAVI procedure but will also will be asked to fill out two questionnaires before and after TAVI:

* Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH)
* Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)

Researchers will compare the minimally invasive, upper extremity group with the standard lower extremity to see if there are difference regarding the posed questions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcomes assessor, being the trial statistician, is blinded for the treatment groups.

Groups are defined as group A and B during the preparation of the statistical tests. Only after performing the required statistical tests the data will be unblinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minimally invasive, upper extremity

Radial artery for pigtail catheter and pacing over the Left Ventricular (LV) stiff wire OR radial artery for pigtail catheter and brachial vein for temporary pacemaker when not pacing over the LV stiff wire.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Comparing different accessory access sites for TAVI: the temporary pacemaker access site and the diagnostic access site.

Lower extremity

Femoral artery for pigtail catheter and pacing over the LV stiff wire OR femoral artery for pigtail catheter and femoral vein for temporary pacemaker when not pacing over the LV stiff wire.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Comparing different accessory access sites for TAVI: the temporary pacemaker access site and the diagnostic access site.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Comparing different accessory access sites for TAVI: the temporary pacemaker access site and the diagnostic access site.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients must be \> 18 years old.
* Written informed consent is obtained from all patients.
* Planned for transfemoral TAVI procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to obtain informed consent.
* Contra-indication for brachial or femoral vein access (temporary pacemaker access site).
* Contra-indication for radial or femoral artery access (diagnostic access site).
* Use of a cerebral embolic protection device (CEPD) if this requires an additional (arterial) access site.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Niels van Royen, prof. dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboud university medical center

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam UMC

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

OLVG

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amphia Ziekenhuis

Breda, , Netherlands

Site Status

Catharina Ziekenhuis

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

Maastricht UMC

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

Nieuwegein, , Netherlands

Site Status

Isala Zwolle

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Versteeg GAA, Rooijakkers MJP, Hemelrijk KI, Vlaar PJ, Overduin DC, van Wely MH, Aarts HM, van Ginkel DJ, van Nunen LX, van Geuns RJ, van Garsse LAFM, Geuzebroek GSC, Verkroost MWA, Cetinyurek-Yavuz A, Heijmen RH, Ten Berg JM, Tonino PAL, Delewi R, van Royen N. Upper- vs Lower-Extremity Secondary Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38578.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39412806 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL80895.091.22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

VARC-TAVI VALVE IMPLANTATION)
NCT06177392 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
ADVANCE Direct Aortic Study
NCT01676727 COMPLETED