Effect of Gemigliptin Versus Glimepiride on Cardiac Diastolic Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT05663736
Last Updated: 2023-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy on Glycemic Variability and Safety of Gemigliptin Compared With Dapagliflozin Added on Metformin Alone or Diabetes Medication Naïve Patient in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Stable II Study)
NCT03202563
Effects of Gemigliptin Versus Sitagliptin or Glimepiride With Metformin on Glucose Variability(MAGE, Glucose SD) Patients With Type 2 DM(STABLE Study)
NCT01890629
An Observational Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes of T2DM PatientsTreated With Gemigliptin
NCT02290301
Efficacy and Safety of Gemigliptin 50mg qd Added in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Glimepiride and Metformin
NCT01990469
Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Gemigliptin 50mg qd Added to Ongoing Glimepiride as Fix-dose Combination in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT02089126
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The American Diabetes Association guidelines recommend to using glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RAs) for patients with T2D at high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor for T2D patients at high risk of heart failure or chronic kidney disease. However, people at this condition are not majority in many countries.
Sulfonylurea is an oral hypoglycemic agent that was first developed in the 1950s and has been widely used for a long time. Since these sulfonylureas are complementary to metformin in their mechanism of action, sulfonylureas and metformin are one of the suitable combination therapies. In fact, in a phase 3 clinical study conducted on Koreans, compared to increasing the dose of metformin, combined administration of glimepiride and metformin proved superior in the hypoglycemic effect. However, when glimepiride and metformin were combined, hypoglycemia occurred more frequently than metformin monotherapy, and there was a side effect of weight gain. Therefore, although sulfonylurea and metformin combination therapy is an effective combination in terms of lowering blood sugar, there are doubts as to whether it is the optimal combination therapy due to side effects such as hypoglycemia and weight gain, which are disadvantages of sulfonylurea itself.
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are an incretin-based therapy that have proven their hypoglycemic effect in both monotherapy and metformin combination therapy. According to the incretin-based mechanism of action, the risk of hypoglycemia is low, and the weight is neutral with DPP-4 inhibitors. In addition, it can be used without serious adverse events. On the contrary to most GLP-1 RAs, DPP-4 inhibitors are oral antidiabetic agents, which are convenient for physicians to prescribe as well as for patients to take. Of note, this class has been known to be more beneficial in Asian ethnic groups. Thus, DPP-4 inhibitors have been widely used in this region.
Like sulfonylurea, when used in combination with initial metformin, it has a superior blood sugar lowering effect compared to metformin alone. However, when metformin is combined with a DPP-4 inhibitor, the risk of hypoglycemia does not increase unlike when sulfonylurea is combined. Therefore, considering the safety related to the occurrence of hypoglycemia, the DPP-4 inhibitor and metformin combination therapy may be the preferred choice over the sulfonylurea and metformin combination therapy. In several phase 3 studies and registry studies in patients with T2D who failed metformin monotherapy, the addition of a DPP-4 inhibitor to metformin was proven to be safe in hypoglycemia compared to the addition of a sulfonylurea.
Among DPP-4 inhibitors, gemigliptin is a relatively recently developed drug, and many clinical studies have shown results that are equivalent to or superior to existing DPP-4 inhibitors such as sitagliptin. However, studies on the safety of gemigliptin in cardiovascular disease have not been conducted, and studies on its effect on cardiac function are lacking. Considering the increase in hospitalizations due to heart failure found in some DPP-4 inhibitor studies, investigation of directly effect of gemigliptin on heart function would be clinically important.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gemiglipitin
A DPP4 inhibitor gemigliptin treatment group
Gemigliptin
DPP-4 inhibitor
Glimepiride
A sulfonylurea glimepiride treatment group
Glimepiride
Glimepiride
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gemigliptin
DPP-4 inhibitor
Glimepiride
Glimepiride
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Soo Lim
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Soo Lim, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
SNUBH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B-1712/438-004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.