Endoscopic Management Of Low Output Recurrent Colonic Fistula Or Leak After Anterior Resection For Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05659446
Last Updated: 2022-12-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-12-10
2022-08-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Included eligible patients were simply randomized at a 1:1 ratio to "Endoscopic (SG)" or "Surgical Group (EG)" via the drawing of sealed envelopes containing computer-generated random numbers prepared by a third party before the start of the intervention.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Included eligible patients were simply randomized at a 1:1 ratio to "Endoscopic (SG)" or "Surgical Group (EG)" via the drawing of sealed envelopes containing computer-generated random numbers prepared by a third party before the start of the intervention.
The sample size was calculated by using an open Epi program depending on the following data; confidence interval 95%, power of the test 80%, ratio of unexposed/ exposed 1, the success rate of endoscopic management of low output colonic fistula after anterior resection of rectal cancer versus surgical management was 60.2% versus 90% respectively . Odd ratio 0.17, and risk ratio 0.67, so the calculated sample size equal 78 patients divided into two equal groups.
Primary and secondary outcomes were success rate in managing the fistula , postoperative hospital stay, and complications and mortality in each group after the intervention during the 3-months follow-up period, respectively.
Diagnosis After full history taking and complete physical examination, low output colonic fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer was clinically suspected and then confirmed by laboratory investigations (complete blood picture, liver and kidney functions, coagulation profile), radiological imaging (abdominal US to exclude any abdominal collection, CT abdomen with oral and I. V contrast, MRI in some situations and virtual colonoscopy to exclude any distal obstruction , distal narrowing or recurrence of the cancer ).
Intervention:
Patients involved in endoscopic group were firstly subjected for Interventional Radiology to drain any intra-peritoneal collection present in preoperative radiology then were subjected either to Clips application (OTSC, OVASCO Endoscopy AG. Tubingen, Germany) or Endo-suturing (Overstitch, Apollo Endo-Surgery , TX, United states) to close the low output fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The endoscopy was done under sedation, not general anesthesia after colonic preparation (chemical \& mechanical preparation) firstly, to detect size of fistula . Clips were used in cases with fistula's size less than 10 mm, while Endo-suturing devices were used in cases with fistula's size more than 10mm till 15mm.
Patients involved in surgical group were subjected to either redo of resection anastomosis manually or by circular stapler or primary repair of the defect with ileostomy. This was done under general anesthesia after colonic preparation.
Follow up after endoscopy and discharge from the hospital:
All patients were subjected for clinical examination \& laboratory investigation during the hospital stay. Any suspected colonic leak or fistula post intervention mandated CT scan with oral and I.V contrast and lower GI endoscopy. Patients were followed-up for at least 3 months post repair.
Statistical analysis Analysis of data was done by IBM computer using SPSS (statistical program for social science version 23): description of quantitative variables as Mean, SD, median and IQR, Shapiro test of normality used to check the data distribution, description of qualitative variables as number and percentage, Chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables between groups, Fisher exact test was used when one expected cell or more are less than 5, Mann-Whitney test was used instead of unpaired t-test in non-parametric data (SD\>30% mean). I considered the results statistically important when the important probability was less than 0.05 (P \< 0.05). P-value \< 0.001 was considered highly statistically important (HS), and P-value ≥ 0.05 was considered statistically insignificant (NS) (10).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
endoscopic group
Patients involved in endoscopic group were firstly subjected for Interventional Radiology to drain any intra-peritoneal collection present in preoperative radiology then were subjected either to Clips application (OTSC, OVASCO Endoscopy AG. Tubingen, Germany) or Endo-suturing (Overstitch, Apollo Endo-Surgery , TX, United states) to close the low output fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The endoscopy was done under sedation, not general anesthesia after colonic preparation (chemical \& mechanical preparation) firstly, to detect size of fistula . Clips were used in cases with fistula's size less than 10 mm, while Endo-suturing devices were used in cases with fistula's size more than 10mm till 15mm.
endoscopy management of low output colonic fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer
Patients involved in endoscopic group were firstly subjected for Interventional Radiology to drain any intra-peritoneal collection present in preoperative radiology then were subjected either to Clips application (OTSC, OVASCO Endoscopy AG. Tubingen, Germany) or Endo-suturing (Overstitch, Apollo Endo-Surgery , TX, United states) to close the low output fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The endoscopy was done under sedation, not general anesthesia after colonic preparation (chemical \& mechanical preparation) firstly, to detect size of fistula . Clips were used in cases with fistula's size less than 10 mm, while Endo-suturing devices were used in cases with fistula's size more than 10mm till 15mm.
surgical group
Patients involved in surgical group were subjected to either redo of resection anastomosis manually or by circular stapler or primary repair of the defect with ileostomy. This was done under general anesthesia after colonic preparation.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
endoscopy management of low output colonic fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer
Patients involved in endoscopic group were firstly subjected for Interventional Radiology to drain any intra-peritoneal collection present in preoperative radiology then were subjected either to Clips application (OTSC, OVASCO Endoscopy AG. Tubingen, Germany) or Endo-suturing (Overstitch, Apollo Endo-Surgery , TX, United states) to close the low output fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The endoscopy was done under sedation, not general anesthesia after colonic preparation (chemical \& mechanical preparation) firstly, to detect size of fistula . Clips were used in cases with fistula's size less than 10 mm, while Endo-suturing devices were used in cases with fistula's size more than 10mm till 15mm.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients who subjected to conservative measures but failed
* patient with good general condition (ASA I\&II),
* patients with size of fistula less than 15mm
* patients with good nutritional status
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with high output fistula ,
* patients with recto-vaginal or recto-vesical fistula,
* patients with size of fistula more than 15mm
* patients were treated with conservative measures.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zagazig University
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Said Mohamed Said Abdou Negm
lecturer of general surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Said Mohamed Negm
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zagazig University Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zagazig University Hospitals
Zagazig, Sharquia, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Negm S, Farag A, Shafiq A, Allah EA, Shehata M, Orban YA, Saleh M, Abdelghani AA. Endoscopic management of low output recurrent colonic fistula or leak after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6145-6152. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10092-z. Epub 2023 May 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Amr Fouad
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id