Remote Ischemic Conditioning Combined With Endovascular Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT05653505

Last Updated: 2022-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this registry is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RIC for patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) undergoing endovascular therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is one of the leading causes of ischemic stroke, and its incidence varies widely among different ethnic groups. ICAS may represent approximately 10% of ischemic stroke in Caucasians and even be responsible for up to 50% in Chinese population. Recurrent stroke risks are as high as 23% 1 year after transient ischemic stroke (TIA) or stroke in patients with a stenosis of 70% or more. The Chinese IntraCranial AtheroSclerosis (CICAS) study indicated the prevalence of ICAS was 46.6%; Patients with ICAS had more severe stroke at admission and stayed longer in hospitals compared with those without intracranial stenosis. After 12 months, recurrent stroke occurred in 3.27% of patients with no stenosis, in 3.82% for those with 50% to 69% stenosis, in 5.16% for those with 70% to 99% stenosis, and in 7.27% for those with total occlusion.

Current guidelines recommend best medical treatment (BMM) for patients with sICAS, which contains antithrombotic therapy, management of vascular risk factor (diabetes, lipids, and especially hypertension) and patient behaviors modification (diet, exercise and smoking cessation). But, even with the intervention of BMM, the recurrence of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) in patients with sICAS still cannot be reduced. Endovascular therapy with intracranial angioplasty and/or stenting holds great promise as a treatment for sICAS. A recent trial found that, compared with bare-metal stent, drug-eluting stent reduced the risks of In-stent restenosis and ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with sICAS. However, endovascular therapy for patients with sICAS is known to be associated with potentially serious complications such as cerebral hyper-perfusion syndrome, intracranial hemorrhage, embolism and In-stent restenosis, etc. Those are the main reasons that affect the effect of endovascular therapy, thus limiting its application and popularization to a great degree.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning (RIC) is one of the most potent neuroprotective approaches that can minimize neuronal damage by protecting against ischemia-reperfusion injury and promote neuronal recovery by stimulating endogenous protective mechanism through transiently occluding the blood supply to non-significant organs or tissues such as limbs. The investigators see a promising future for RIC in facilitating further clinical translation and application due to its unique features of safety, simplicity and non-invasiveness. In recent years, the safety and efficacy of RIC on stroke intervention has been confirmed by a series of basic and clinical researches, among which RIC in combination with adjuvant drug therapy for sICAS-induced ischemic stroke patient improve cerebral blood flow and reduce stroke recurrence. Since its safety and efficacy has been verified, RIC can also be used to reduce the risks of In-stent restenosis for patients with carotid stent implantation and has extensive application prospects for patients with severe acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy.

There is not enough evidence as to provide any specific recommendation regarding the use of RIC in sICAS patients, But we speculate that RIC has a certain effect on preventing perioperative complications for patients with sICAS undergoing endovascular therapy. Therefore, we intend to conduct this prospective cohort study to shed light on the utility of this promising therapy.

This study prospectively collects data of patients with sICAS who receive endovascular therapy in the Comprehensive Neurovascular Ward of Tianjin Huanhu Hospital. Depending on their preference, patients enrolled in this registry will be divided into 2 groups, receiving either endovascular therapy alone or endovascular therapy plus RIC respectively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intracranial Arteriosclerosis Ischemic Preconditioning Endovascular Procedures

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning Endovascular Stenting Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endovascular therapy

According to current guideline recommendations, patients enrolled in this cohort will receive standardized perioperative management, endovascular therapy, and postoperative medical therapy.

No interventions assigned to this group

Endovascular therapy+Remote ischemic conditioning

Patients enrolled in this cohort will receive the same treatment as those in the endovascular therapy alone cohort as well as additional remote ischemic conditioning treatment.

Remote ischemic conditioning treatment protocol: RIC will be applied immediately after admission to the integrated neurovascular ward and the treatment continues until the patient is discharged, Once the patient is discharged, the choice of whether to continue RIC treatment depends on the patient's preference. RIC was induced through a standard blood pressure cuff placed around the non-paretic arm. The protocol includes 5 cycles of intermittent manually induced upper limb ischemia, alternating 5 minutes of inflation (20mmHg above systolic blood pressure), and 5 minutes of deflation twice a day.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Intervention Type OTHER

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) refers to a process whereby periods of intermittent ischemia, typically via the cyclical application of a blood pressure cuff to a limb at above systolic pressure, confers systemic protection against ischemia in spatially distinct vascular territories.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning

Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) refers to a process whereby periods of intermittent ischemia, typically via the cyclical application of a blood pressure cuff to a limb at above systolic pressure, confers systemic protection against ischemia in spatially distinct vascular territories.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient admitted from Jan. 1st 2023 to Jan. 1st 2025;
2. Age ≥ 18;
3. Intracranial atherosclerosis stenosis measured as ≥70% by digital subtraction angiography or by other noninvasive methods, such as transcranial doppler, computed tomography angiography, or magnetic resonance angiography;
4. A history of stroke/transient ischemic attack attributed to ICAS;
5. Verbal and written informed consent is provided at the time of admission by patients or their legally authorized representatives.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Stenosis of other causes;
2. Prior ipsilateral stroke with residual deficits;
3. Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure ≥200 mm Hg despite medications at enrollment);
4. Peripheral vascular disease (especially subclavian arterial and upper limb artery stenosis or occlusion).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ming Wei

Chief Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming Wei, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tianjin Huanhu Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

TianJinHH

Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ming Wei, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 13502182903

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TJHH-2022-WM11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id