Father Inclusive Prenatal Care Study

NCT ID: NCT05652387

Last Updated: 2025-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

216 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-09

Study Completion Date

2025-09-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Young families need additional institutional support to help them meet the challenges of parenthood. Prenatal clinics are well situated to address some of their needs by expanding services to include fathers. The Father Inclusive Prenatal Care (FIPC) model is designed to prepare young men for the challenges of parenting by supporting the development of their relationship skills as part of routine prenatal healthcare. This approach involves assessing expectant fathers and mothers with a "parent prep-check" (PPC) to identify their needs and then offer services to address those needs and prepare them for parenthood. Services include: (1) parent education about how to understand and care for infants, and how to build secure parent-child bonds; (2) an evidence-based co-parenting program to strengthen and stabilize their family; and (3) educational and employment support designed to help young parents find and keep living wage jobs. The project will be implemented through several community based healthcare sites that are well positioned to engage young fathers through their prenatal clinics. To extend the reach and accessibility of the model, trainings and most services will be available online. As a result of participating in this project it is expected that young couples will have better co-parenting relationships and be better prepared to take care of their infants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recruitment: This project will recruit/engage young expectant fathers using a multi-stage process. First, primary care providers (PCP) will ask their patients (17-25-year-old pregnant women) about the degree to which the father of her child will be participating in parenting and supporting their baby. If the mother anticipates the fathers' involvement, the provider will tell her about the Parent Prep-Checks (PPC), give her a brochure about describing that process (including incentives), and ask about connecting her with members of the research team in order to receive additional information. The research team members will establish father eligibility based upon age (18-29 years) and schedule time to meet with both parents.

The intake process - the Parent Prep Check - is a strategy for engaging young fathers and mothers in research and intervention activities. In addition to collecting useful baseline data, the PPC is designed to build a strong alliance between project staff and participants. For example, FIPC intake staff are trained to administer a semi-structured interview designed to help participants articulate their feelings about becoming parents, which most find to be an interesting and rewarding experience. Then to facilitate recruitment into the intervention, a motivational interviewing approach is used that (a) gives feedback to participants based on their self-reported data and (b) engages them in thinking about what services will help them get ready for parenthood. When fathers are given the chance to say what concerns them, they are more likely to be receptive to participating in programs that can address those concerns. Intake staff will then introduce expectant parents to a FIPC provider, who discusses the goals and benefits of the FIPC program. Emphasizing how FIPC programs address a parent's self-identified goals has been an effective way to engage and retain participants.

The most critical element in this process is the quality of communication between FIPC staff and the expectant mother and father. If done well, both parents will feel appreciated, supported, and respected. Another key factor is flexibility. FIPC staff are trained to be as accommodating as possible about scheduling appointments. Related to this, almost all FIPC services and research activities are available online to increase participant reach and accessibly.

Finally, fathers and mothers are told they will be reimbursed for their time. Incentivizing patients is not sustainable over the long run; however, it is deemed necessary to get a representative sample for this project. In years 4 and 5, incentives for services will be reduced as part of the sustainability plan. In past projects, this strategy has been effective in recruiting between 60 and 75% of eligible expectant fathers.

Staff at partner clinics and Rush program coordinators who will be trained on the FIPC program and research/evaluation data protocol will be responsible for recruiting the sample. The clinic staff will be asking eligible mothers if they think their partner (father of the baby) would be interested in participating. The FIPC program coordinators will be responsible for contacting fathers and recruiting them to participate after mothers share their contact information.

Barrier reduction strategies will be used to support participant engagement. Due to the length of the Parent Prep check (3 hours), expectant parents will be offered a snack during the interview.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Antenatal Care Pregnancy Related Parent-Child Relations Parenting Education Counseling

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

fatherhood prenatal care coparenting parenting education

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Descriptive/Evaluative
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Father Inclusive Prenatal Care

Co parenting, parenting education, employment and educational readiness training and support.

Group Type OTHER

Father Inclusive Prenatal Care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Pregnant and parenting couples participate in co-parenting and parenting education, and job skills and education readiness

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Father Inclusive Prenatal Care

Pregnant and parenting couples participate in co-parenting and parenting education, and job skills and education readiness

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women: pregnant woman
* Men \& women have to be willing to participate at baseline interview together

Exclusion Criteria

* Men \& Women: Language other than Spanish or English and cognitive disability interfering with ability to understand the informed consent process.
Minimum Eligible Age

17 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

29 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Bureau - Administration for Children and Families

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Skills for Chicagoland's Future-Chicago

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Parent Child Center (PCC) Community Wellness Center

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rush University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wrenetha A Julion, PhD, MPH, RN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rush University Medical Center

Paul w Florsheim, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Florsheim P, Burrow-Sanchez JJ, Minami T, McArthur L, Heavin S, Hudak C. Young parenthood program: supporting positive paternal engagement through coparenting counseling. Am J Public Health. 2012 Oct;102(10):1886-92. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300902. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22897540 (View on PubMed)

Florsheim, P., McArthur, L., Hudak, C., Heavin, S., & Burrow-Sanchez, J. (2011). The Young Parenthood Program: Preventing intimate partner violence between adolescent mothers and young fathers. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 10(2), 117-134.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Paul, H. A. (2015). The Young Parenthood Program: A Guide to Helping Young Mothers and Fathers Become Effective Co-Parents, by P. Florsheim: New York, NY: Oxford University Press, vii+ 222 pp., $45.00 (paperback).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Julion WA, Breitenstein SM, Waddell D. Fatherhood intervention development in collaboration with African American non-resident fathers. Res Nurs Health. 2012 Oct;35(5):490-506. doi: 10.1002/nur.21492. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22685066 (View on PubMed)

Julion WA, Sumo J, Bounds DT, Breitenstein SM, Schoeny M, Gross D, Fogg L. Study protocol for a randomized clinical trial of a fatherhood intervention for African American non-resident fathers: Can we improve father and child outcomes? Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jul;49:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27241687 (View on PubMed)

Julion, W. A., Sumo, J. N., Schoeny, M. E., Breitenstein, S. M., & Bounds, D. T. (2021). Predictors of Maternal Participation in Fatherhood Intervention Research With African American Nonresident Fathers. Research on Social Work Practice, 10497315211005538.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20062803-IRB01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id