PLT and Steroid in Lateral Epicondylopathy and Supraspinatus Calcific Tendinopathy

NCT ID: NCT05648032

Last Updated: 2022-12-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-06

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PLT vs. steroid vs. PLT + steroid, which treatment is most effective in lateral epicondylitis (or tennis elbow) and supraspinatus calcific tendinitis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lateral epicondylitis (or tennis elbow) and supraspinatus calcific tendinitis are common tendinopathies of the upper limb and both have negative impacts on the patients' quality of life. The former affects function of wrist extension due to degeneration of common extensor tendons; the latter causes severe pain and limitation of shoulder range of motion due to calcific deposits within the supraspinatus tendon. Current common injection therapies are ultrasound-guided injection of steroid or platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

Previous studies have shown that steroid injection provides early but short-term pain reduction, while PRP injection causes post-injection pain by inducing inflammation but provides long-term pain relief and functional improvement. It may provide early pain reduction with long-term tissue regeneration if combining steroid and PRP. A recent study on tennis elbow showed that inclusion of steroid in the autologous whole blood and 20% dextrose injection can reduce pain during early treatment, without interfering with the therapeutic effects.

Furthermore, disadvantages of current PRP include difficulty in quantifying platelet numbers and growth factor activity, and in long-term preservation. In this study lyophilized platelet (PLT) can solve these problems, which can be dissolved in saline before injection.

This 3-arm randomized controlled trial will divide subjects into the PLT group (group A), steroid group (group B) or PLT+steroid group (group C). Therapeutic effects will be evaluated by pain visual analogue scale (VAS), grip dynamometer, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaires during follow-ups at 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th and 24th week after treatment, and ultrasound at 12th and 24th week . The hypothesis is that PLT+steroid injection will have earlier pain reduction than PLT injection and longer effects of pain reduction and functional improvement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lateral Epicondylitis Rotator Cuff Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Tennis elbow Supraspinatus calcific tendinitis
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The syringe is covered.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PLT (lyophilized platelet) with steroid

PLT (30ng)+1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL (10.0 mg/mL) Triamcinolone acetonide, once

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lyophilized platelet (30ng) and triamcinolone acetonide 10mg

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Ultrasound-guided injection of lyophilized platelet (30ng)+1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL (10.0 mg/mL) Triamcinolone acetonide into the hypoechoic area of common extensor tendon (in lateral epicondylopathy) or around calcific spots (in supraspinatus calcific tendinitis)

PLT (lyophilized platelet)

PLT (30ng)+1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL normal saline, once

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lyophilized platelet (30ng)

Intervention Type OTHER

Ultrasound-guided injection of PLT (30ng)+1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL normal saline into the hypoechoic area of common extensor tendon (in lateral epicondylopathy) or around calcific spots (in supraspinatus calcific tendinitis)

Steroid

1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL (10.0 mg/mL) Triamcinolone acetonide, once

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

triamcinolone acetonide 10mg

Intervention Type DRUG

Ultrasound-guided injection of 1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL (10.0 mg/mL) Triamcinolone acetonide into the hypoechoic area of common extensor tendon (in lateral epicondylopathy) or around calcific spots (in supraspinatus calcific tendinitis)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lyophilized platelet (30ng) and triamcinolone acetonide 10mg

Ultrasound-guided injection of lyophilized platelet (30ng)+1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL (10.0 mg/mL) Triamcinolone acetonide into the hypoechoic area of common extensor tendon (in lateral epicondylopathy) or around calcific spots (in supraspinatus calcific tendinitis)

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

lyophilized platelet (30ng)

Ultrasound-guided injection of PLT (30ng)+1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL normal saline into the hypoechoic area of common extensor tendon (in lateral epicondylopathy) or around calcific spots (in supraspinatus calcific tendinitis)

Intervention Type OTHER

triamcinolone acetonide 10mg

Ultrasound-guided injection of 1.0 mL 1.0% Lidocaine+1.0 mL (10.0 mg/mL) Triamcinolone acetonide into the hypoechoic area of common extensor tendon (in lateral epicondylopathy) or around calcific spots (in supraspinatus calcific tendinitis)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PLT and steroid Blood product steroid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Tenderness at lateral epicondyle more than 3 months
* Ultrasound-confirmed lateral epicondylopathy
* Pain VAS ≥ 3/10 during wrist resistive extension
* No treatment response to NSAID and physiotherapy


* Hawkins-Kennedy test or empty can test, one of which is positive
* Ultrasound-confirmed (calcification \> 2mm)
* Pain VAS ≥ 3/10 over right deltoid area more than 3 months
* No treatment response to NSAID and physiotherapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation
* Carpal tunnel syndrome (the same arm) in one year
* Cervical radiculopathy
* Taking NSAID in one week
* Receiving PRP or steroid injection in one month
* History of bacteremia, cellulitis or skin ulcer in three months
* Rheumatoid arthritis
* Malignancy
* Poorly controlled diabetets mellitus (DM), liver and kidner diseases
* Severe anemia (Hb\<5)
* Thrombocytopenia
* History of tennis elbow surgery
* History of elbow trauma

Supraspinatus calcific tendinis


* Pregnancy or lactation
* Carpal tunnel syndrome (the same arm) in one year
* Cervical radiculopathy
* Taking NSAID in one week
* Receiving PRP or steroid injection in one month
* History of bacteremia, cellulitis or skin ulcer in three months
* Rheumatoid arthritis
* Malignancy
* Poorly controlled DM, liver and kidner diseases
* Severe anemia (Hb\<5)
* Thrombocytopenia
* History of shoulder surgery
* History of shoulder trauma
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chueh-Hung Wu, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chueh-Hung Wu, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 886-2-23123456

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Wan-Ju Chien, M.S.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201903076DIPC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id