Stroke Volume Variations and Pulse Pressure Variations Undergoing Artificial Pneumothorax Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05644405

Last Updated: 2022-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-01

Study Completion Date

2022-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) have been thought to be sensitive predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated participants. In this paper, the investigators reported a special group of people to use SVV and PPV during their operation. The maintenance of hemodynamic stability and the critical organ perfusion is crucial to the treatment for patients with artificial Pneumothorax during esophageal surgery, because artificial pneumothorax causes incomplete ventilation of one lung. In addition, artificial pneumothorax may seriously affect theparticipant's heart and lung function, brings more challenges to the intraoperative anesthetic management, expecially in volume management. Little information is available about the accuracy of SVV and PPV to predict fluid responsiveness in participants with artificial Pneumothorax during esophageal surgery. It is unclear whether it will affect the accuracy of SVV and PPV, and whether it will cause the change of their threshold values. The investigators will discuss it in the passage and the investigators will give an preliminary mechanism to explain the results.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Backgroud: This study aims to evaluate the ability of stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated participants with artificial Pneumothorax during esophageal surgery.

Methods: 40 participants, diagnosed with esophageal cancer, undergoing thoracoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer were studied. All the participants used Vigileo/FloTrac system for analysis. Haemodynamic data such as MAP, HR, SV, SVI, CO, CI, SVV, PPV were recorded before and after volume expansion (VE). Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in SVI≥10%(△SVI≥10%). Participants were divided into Responders and Non-responders by changes in △SVI ≥10% and \< 10%. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the hemodynamic parameters of Responders and Non-responders before and after VE. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the values of SVV, PPV and △SVI. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of each hemodynamic index was drawn to determine its accuracy and threshold.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Artificial; Complications, Heart

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FloTrac Vigileo

A dedicated transducer (FloTrac TM, Edwards Lifesciences, LLC, Irvine, CA, USA) was connected to the radial arterial line on one side and to the Vigileo System (Vigileo TM Edwards Lifesciences, LLC, Irvine, CA, USA) on the other side

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Must be arranged for thoracoscopic surgical treatment of esophageal cancer Must be mechanically ventilated with artificial Pneumothorax during the operation Must be normal in Allen test.

Exclusion Criteria

Hypertension Coronary heart disease Arrhythmia Left ventricle ejection fractions \< 50% (EF\<50%) Pulmonary hypertension Congenital cardiovascular malformation Peripheral vascular disease Long-term history of oral vasoactive drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese PLA General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yu Chen, MD

Chinese PLA General Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mi Weidong, Doctor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Chinese PLA General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Choi KH, Shim JK, Kim DW, Byun CS, Park JH. Dynamic Indices Fail to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation for Thoracoscopic Surgery. J Clin Med. 2021 May 27;10(11):2335. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112335.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34071746 (View on PubMed)

Chuang KH, Lai HH, Chen Y, Chen LC, Lu HI, Chen YH, Li SH, Lo CM. Improvement of surgical complications using single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation and artificial carbon dioxide pneumothorax in esophagectomy: a meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Apr 21;16(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01459-1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33882958 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CY2022-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id