Esketamine-propofol Versus Propofol for Flexible Bronchoscopy
NCT ID: NCT05643066
Last Updated: 2025-12-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
246 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-07
2023-12-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Propofol is an effective agent for sedation in bronchoscopy with rapid onset and recovery. However, the safety endpoints of propofol are not cost-effective, including injection pain, hypotension, apnea, airway compromise, and without a reversal agent. Specifically, the depressive effects on the respiratory system are more noteworthy in bronchoscopy, which may lead to hypoxia. These drawbacks may hinder functional recovery and delay the discharge time. Hence, physicians are searching for an optimal sedation regimen for bronchoscopy.
Esketamine, the s-enantiomer of ketamine, is an N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor antagonist with potent analgesic and sedative properties. Evidence suggested that esketamine could be used as a component of sedative regimen in many settings, such as endoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Nevertheless, there remains an evidence gap in the efficacy and safety of esketamine used in bronchoscopy. Therefore, we conducted this study to test the hypothesis that low-dose esketamine as an adjuvant to propofol was non-inferior to propofol alone on the recovery profile and discharge from the hospital after ambulatory bronchoscopy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
0.1 mg/kg esketamine group
Procedure sedation was induced using intravenous 0.1 mg/kg esketamine and propofol 1 mg/kg. Afterward, propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered to maintain the target sedation level (MOAA/S of less than three).
0.1 mg/kg esketamine
Esketamine 0.1 mg/kg was intravenously injected first.
Propofol
Propofol 1 mg/kg was injected immediately. Afterward, propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered to maintain the target sedation level (MOAA/S of less than three).
0.2 mg/kg esketamine group
Procedure sedation was induced using intravenous 0.2 mg/kg esketamine and propofol 1 mg/kg. Afterward, propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered to maintain the target sedation level (MOAA/S of less than three).
0.2 mg/kg esketamine
Esketamine 0.2 mg/kg was intravenously injected first.
Propofol
Propofol 1 mg/kg was injected immediately. Afterward, propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered to maintain the target sedation level (MOAA/S of less than three).
Placebo group
Procedure sedation was induced using intravenous 0.9% saline and propofol 1 mg/kg. Afterward, propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered to maintain the target sedation level (MOAA/S of less than three).
0.9% saline
0.9% saline was intravenously injected first.
Propofol
Propofol 1 mg/kg was injected immediately. Afterward, propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered to maintain the target sedation level (MOAA/S of less than three).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.1 mg/kg esketamine
Esketamine 0.1 mg/kg was intravenously injected first.
0.2 mg/kg esketamine
Esketamine 0.2 mg/kg was intravenously injected first.
0.9% saline
0.9% saline was intravenously injected first.
Propofol
Propofol 1 mg/kg was injected immediately. Afterward, propofol 0.5 mg/kg was administered to maintain the target sedation level (MOAA/S of less than three).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Scheduled for ambulatory bronchoscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome
3. History of psychiatric illness
4. History of neurological disease
5. Pre-existing memory or cognitive impairment
6. History of seizure disorders
7. Pregnancy
8. Substance abuse or intake of drugs that affect the central nervous system
9. Inability to communicate in Mandarin Chinese.
10. Illiteracy
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fujian Provincial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yao Yusheng
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xiaochun Zheng, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Fujian Provincial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fujian provincial hospital
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
K2021-12-067
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id