Uterocervical Angle in Prediction of Preterm Labor

NCT ID: NCT05632003

Last Updated: 2023-01-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

77 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Preterm delivery occurs in about 5-18% of pregnancies before 37 weeks' gestation all over the world.It is associated with a high prevalence of neurological deficits, developmental disabilities and is a leading cause of infant and neonatal mortality.

Many of the methods used for predicting preterm birth has not been proven efficacy and is not currently recommended for use.The length of the cervix has been one of the most useful methods in predicting the risk of premature delivery. Detection rates may be improved if combined with other parameters such as the uterocervical angle as a new predictor of spontaneous preterm birth.

In this study we will compare between using the uterocervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of preterm labour.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Preterm birth, defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation, affects 5 to 18% of pregnancies. It is the leading cause of neonatal death and the second cause of childhood death below the age of 5 years. Preterm delivery (birth before 37 weeks' gestation) is further delineated into very early preterm (before 32 weeks), early preterm (32 0/7 to 33 6/7 weeks), and late preterm (34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks). It is logical to divide PTD into different subcategories: live-borns vs. intrauterine fetal deaths, singleton pregnancies vs. multiple pregnancies and spontaneous PTD vs. iatrogenic PTD. About 80% of all the preterm infants are live born singletons. The majority of these deliveries are spontaneous, due to onset of contractions or to spontaneously ruptured membranes. Conversely, iatrogenic preterm deliveries are due to the physician's decision to induce labor for maternal or fetal medical reasons. However, since the terminology varies, it is crucial to use clear definitions in all circumstances where the different phenotypical terms are used.

Preterm delivery is the consequence of four main mechanisms: activation of the maternal-fetal placental interaction with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, inflammation in the amniochorionic-decidual tissue, decidual hemorrhage and pathological distention of the myometrium. Although in most cases preterm births occur idiopathically, fetal, uterine, and placental factors as well as maternal chronic diseases, can affect preterm birth. It is estimated that of all cases of PTB, only 8.7% and 1.7- 2.3% of women, respectively, have the risk factors of prior PTB or significant cervical shortening in the midtrimester and would benefit from prophylactic therapy. A number of risk factors for preterm birth are known, but this does not mean that recognizing one of them in a pregnant woman before the 37th week means that a preterm birth will certainly begin. Knowledge of the risk factors allows for more intensive observation of the pregnant woman and gives obstetricians insight into what should be avoide . There are many maternal or fetal characteristics that have been associated with preterm birth, including maternal demographic characteristics, nutritional status, pregnancy history, present pregnancy characteristics, psychological characteristics, adverse behaviours, infection, uterine contractions and cervical length, and biological and genetic markers. Proposed techniques for detecting at-risk pregnancies include risk factor-based scoring systems, home uterine activity monitoring, maternal serum chemistries, salivary estriol, cervicovaginal chemistries, and amniotic fluid analytes. These modalities are characterized by either inadequate screening efficiencies, invasiveness, expense, or lack of commercial availability. Moreover, their use does not demonstrate reduced spontaneous preterm birth rates. Cervical length (CL) measured by transvaginal sonography (TVS) has been shown to be an effective predictor of spontaneous preterm birth (PTB). This finding has been confirmed in singleton and multiple gestations, in women with or without risk factors for preterm birth, and in asymptomatic women as well as women with preterm labor (PTL) or preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM). The anterioruterocervical angle (aUCA) is a novel transvaginal ultrasonographic marker that showed evidence of being useful as a screening tool for spontaneous PTB. It can be used as an alternative to cervical length (CL) as screening method for sPTB. It involves measurement of the angle between the anterior lower uterine segment (LUS) and cervix. A wide, or obtuse, anterior uterocervical angle (aUCA) lends a more direct, linear outlet of uterine contents onto the cervix. A narrower, or acute, UCA supports an anatomical geometry that would exert less direct force on the internal os, which may be protective from cervical deformation. A wide aUCA ≥95ᶿ and ≥105ᶿ detected during the 2nd trimester was associated with an increased risk for sPTB\<37 and \<34 weeks, respectively. However, the studies that provided this evidence were retrospective and their results were heterogeneous. Our objective is to evaluate whether the anterior UCA can predict risk of sPTB in a general population of singletons and to evaluate its performance for predicting sPTB relative to CL.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Labor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Singleton pregnancy
2. History of spontaneous preterm birth
3. Recruitment at 16 to 24 weeks of pregnancy
4. Normal growth pattern evaluated by estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference

Exclusion Criteria

1. Medical disorders which can lead to uteroplacental insufficiency
2. Congenital uterine anomalies, as it may change the uterocervical angle.
3. Congenital fetal malformations detected on midtrimesteric anomaly scan
4. Pregnancy on IVF/ICSI
5. Smoking during pregnancy
6. History of cervical trauma
7. Preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes
8. Polyhydramnios
9. Cervical cerclage
10. Antepartum hemorrhage
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Mohammed Elmaraghy

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohammed S Elsokkary, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Ainshams university maternity hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AinShams university maternity hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Berghella V, Palacio M, Ness A, Alfirevic Z, Nicolaides KH, Saccone G. Cervical length screening for prevention of preterm birth in singleton pregnancy with threatened preterm labor: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;49(3):322-329. doi: 10.1002/uog.17388. Epub 2017 Feb 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27997053 (View on PubMed)

DeFranco EA, Lewis DF, Odibo AO. Improving the screening accuracy for preterm labor: is the combination of fetal fibronectin and cervical length in symptomatic patients a useful predictor of preterm birth? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):233.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.015. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23246314 (View on PubMed)

Di Renzo GC, Cabero Roura L, Facchinetti F, Helmer H, Hubinont C, Jacobsson B, Jorgensen JS, Lamont RF, Mikhailov A, Papantoniou N, Radzinsky V, Shennan A, Ville Y, Wielgos M, Visser GHA. Preterm Labor and Birth Management: Recommendations from the European Association of Perinatal Medicine. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Sep;30(17):2011-2030. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1323860. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28482713 (View on PubMed)

Dziadosz M, Bennett TA, Dolin C, West Honart A, Pham A, Lee SS, Pivo S, Roman AS. Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):376.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.033. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27018466 (View on PubMed)

Farras Llobet A, Higueras T, Calero IZ, Regincos Marti L, Maiz N, Goya MM, Carreras E. Prospective evaluation of the uterocervical angle as a predictor of spontaneous preterm birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Nov;99(11):1511-1518. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13879. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32311754 (View on PubMed)

Halimi Asl AA, Safari S, Parvareshi Hamrah M. Epidemiology and Related Risk Factors of Preterm Labor as an obstetrics emergency. Emerg (Tehran). 2017;5(1):e3. Epub 2017 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28286810 (View on PubMed)

Kagan KO, Sonek J. How to measure cervical length. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;45(3):358-62. doi: 10.1002/uog.14742. Epub 2015 Jan 29. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25632014 (View on PubMed)

Khamees RE, Khattab BM, Elshahat AM, Taha OT, Aboelroose AA. Uterocervical angle versus cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Feb;156(2):304-308. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13629. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33507541 (View on PubMed)

Pawelec M, Palczynski B, Krzemieniewska J, Karmowski M, Korys J, Latkowski K, Karmowski A. Initiation of preterm labor. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;22(2):283-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23709385 (View on PubMed)

Romero R, Dey SK, Fisher SJ. Preterm labor: one syndrome, many causes. Science. 2014 Aug 15;345(6198):760-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1251816. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25124429 (View on PubMed)

Rundell K, Panchal B. Preterm Labor: Prevention and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2017 Mar 15;95(6):366-372.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28318214 (View on PubMed)

Sen C. Preterm labor and preterm birth. J Perinat Med. 2017 Nov 27;45(8):911-913. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0298. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29055176 (View on PubMed)

Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG. Biophysical and Biochemical Screening for the Risk of Preterm Labor: An Update. Clin Lab Med. 2016 Jun;36(2):369-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Mar 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27235918 (View on PubMed)

Elmaraghy AM, Shaaban SMA, Elsokkary MS, Elshazly ISMA. Uterocervical angle versus cervical length in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in women with history of spontaneous preterm birth: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 13;23(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05977-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37704977 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.