Trial Outcomes & Findings for Development of a Training Intervention to Improve Mental Health Treatment Effectiveness and Engagement for Youth With Documented Mental Health Disparities (NCT NCT05626231)
NCT ID: NCT05626231
Last Updated: 2025-09-25
Results Overview
Percent of providers at pilot site who consented to participate in the study relative to number of employed providers at pilot site.
COMPLETED
NA
286 participants
At time of training intervention
2025-09-25
Participant Flow
Providers were not actively recruited, but rather, all partner clinic mental health providers (e.g., psychiatrists, social workers) were invited to participate in the study. Youth patients and their parents recruitment involved sending an interest email to the partner clinic's listserv of all patients and paretnss. Otherwise, youth will be included in the study if they received treatment at the clinic during the open trial phase and were between the ages of 12-25.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Training Intervention
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Provider Enrollment
STARTED
|
109
|
|
Provider Enrollment
Providers Who Consented to the Study
|
93
|
|
Provider Enrollment
COMPLETED
|
93
|
|
Provider Enrollment
NOT COMPLETED
|
16
|
|
Youth Patient Enrollment
STARTED
|
125
|
|
Youth Patient Enrollment
COMPLETED
|
125
|
|
Youth Patient Enrollment
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
|
Parents of Youth Patient Enrollment
STARTED
|
68
|
|
Parents of Youth Patient Enrollment
COMPLETED
|
68
|
|
Parents of Youth Patient Enrollment
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Training Intervention
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Provider Enrollment
Worked part-time
|
4
|
|
Provider Enrollment
On leave (e.g., parental leave)
|
3
|
|
Provider Enrollment
Non-clinical employee
|
1
|
|
Provider Enrollment
Provider does not see clients
|
3
|
|
Provider Enrollment
Other
|
5
|
Baseline Characteristics
The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=286 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous. training intervention.
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth patients, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients · White:
|
50 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients · More than one race:
|
15 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients · Other:
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients · Unknown:
|
47 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · American Indian or Alaska Native:
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Asian:
|
7 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Black or African American:
|
1 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander:
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · White:
|
52 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · More than one race:
|
2 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Other:
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Unknown:
|
6 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
286 participants
n=286 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
Providers
|
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Continuous
Youth Patients
|
16 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3 • n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Continuous
Parents of Youth Patients
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Providers · >18
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Providers · 18-65
|
81 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Providers · 65<
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Providers · Not reported
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Youth Patients · >18
|
51 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Youth Patients · 18-65
|
74 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Youth Patients · 65<
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Youth Patients · Not reported
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · >18
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · 18-65
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · 65<
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Age, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Not reported
|
68 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers · Cisgender Women
|
66 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers · Cisgender Men
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers · Transgender Women
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers · Transgender Men
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers · Nonbinary/genderqueer
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Providers · Not Reported
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients · Cisgender Women
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients · Cisgender Men
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients · Transgender Women
|
10 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients · Transgender Men
|
14 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients · Nonbinary/genderqueer
|
58 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Youth Patients · Not Reported
|
43 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Cisgender Women
|
45 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Cisgender Men
|
18 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Transgender Women
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Transgender Men
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Nonbinary/genderqueer
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Parents of Youth Patients · Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
78 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Providers · Unknown or Not Reported
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Youth Patients · Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Youth Patients · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
66 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Youth Patients · Unknown or Not Reported
|
48 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents of Youth Patients · Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents of Youth Patients · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
59 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Parents of Youth Patients · Unknown or Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=68 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers · American Indian or Alaska Native:
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers · Asian:
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers · Black or African American:
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander:
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers · White:
|
65 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers · More than one race:
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers · Other:
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Providers · Unknown:
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients · American Indian or Alaska Native:
|
2 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients · Asian:
|
6 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients · Black or African American:
|
5 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Youth Patients · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander:
|
0 Participants
n=125 Participants • The overall baseline participant N = 286 is the sum of N = 93 provider, N = 125 youth, and N = 68 parents.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At time of training interventionPercent of providers at pilot site who consented to participate in the study relative to number of employed providers at pilot site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=109 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Provider Participant Recruitment Rates (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)
|
93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-training to post-training (up to 4 weeks after the training)Change in the percent of providers who complete pre- and post- assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the 6- and 12-month assessment completion rates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=93 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at Post-training (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)
|
79 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-training (up to 4 weeks after the training) to 6-month followupChange in the percent of providers who complete post- and 6-month followup assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the pre-training and 12-month assessment completion rates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=93 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at 6-month Followup (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)
|
47 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6-month followup to 12-month followupChange in the percent of providers who complete 6- and 12-month followup assessments of those who consented to participate. These assessment completion rates will also be compared to the pre-training and post-training assessment completion rates.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=93 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Provider Participant Assessment Completion Rates at 12-month Followup (Feasibility of Conducting a Larger Trial)
|
46 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Post-training, 6-month to 12-month followupPopulation: Some provider participants did not complete adoption measures at certain time-points
A self-report survey measuring whether, and the extent to which, provider participants used the practices they learned in the training intervention. The survey is currently being developed and will be adapted based on the Pachankis et al. (2022) measure Providers' Familiarity With and Use of LGBTQ-affirmative CBT Skills. The survey will be administered at the 6- and 12 month followups to see the change over time. Scores are calculated using mean scores for values 0-4 with higher numbers indicating more of the use of the practice (i.e., (0) Not at all, (4) Very much)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=93 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Change in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month Followup
Baseline
|
2.76 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
|
Change in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month Followup
Post-training
|
3.21 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
|
Change in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month Followup
6-month follow-up
|
2.86 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
|
Change in the Adoption of Practices Learned in the Training Intervention at 12-month Followup
12-month follow-up
|
3.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to the 12-month followupElectronic monitoring of training intervention completion by providers (i.e., whether all modules were completed).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=93 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Electronic Monitoring of Training Intervention Completion (Adoption of Training Intervention)
|
78 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to the 12-month followupPopulation: Of the 93 participants who started the training, 78 completed the training. Thus, those 78 providers were analyzed.
Electronic monitoring of training intervention engagement (e.g., days spent completing the training)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=78 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Outcome: Electronic Monitoring of Training Intervention Engagement (Adoption of Training Intervention)
|
18.88 Days
Standard Deviation 31.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weekly from pre-intervention to 12 months after training intervention completionAvailable chart data from clients of providers who completed the intervention will be monitored for their behavioral engagement. Session participation will be measured by electronic health record monitoring of treatment measures completion (e.g., answering all questions and submitting measures related to client treatment, such as the TAQs).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=193 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Client Behavioral Engagement by Session Participation
Youth Patients
|
125 Participants
|
|
Client Behavioral Engagement by Session Participation
Parents of Youth Patients
|
68 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weekly from pre-intervention to 12 months after training intervention completionAvailable chart data from clients of providers who completed the intervention will be monitored for their behavioral engagement. Session attendance will be measured as an aspect of behavioral engagement by noting attended and canceled sessions. Outcomes report the total number of GMY participants who attended therapy during the timeframe
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=125 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Client Behavioral Engagement by Session Attendance
|
125 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weekly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow upPopulation: 52 total participants completed the TAQS measure. 3 youth participants completed the measure both at the pre- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.
The Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (TAQS) is a 5-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on their last session with their therapist. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to higher quality alliance (e.g., 1= "Not at all," 2= "Only a little," 3= "Somewhat," 4= "Quite a bit," and 5= "Totally"). The TAQS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention TAQs score (i.e., first instance of participant completing TAQs prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up TAQs score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=52 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
3.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .76
|
|
Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Youth Patients, 12-month Follow-up
|
3.95 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
|
Therapeutic Alliance Quality Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Parents of Youth Patients, Pre-Intervention
|
2.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every other week from pre-intervention to 12-month follow upPopulation: 60 participants total completed the SSS measure. 3 youth participants and 1 caregiver participants completed the measure at both the pre- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.
The Service Satisfaction Scale (SSS) is a 5-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on how satisfied they are with the mental health services that they receive. Items are rated on a 4-point scale with higher responses corresponding to higher service satisfaction (e.g., 1= "No, definitely not," 2= "No, not really," 3= "Yes, generally," and 4= "Yes, definitely"). The SSS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention SSS score (i.e., first instance of participant completing SSS prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up SSS score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=60 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Service Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
3.25 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Service Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up
|
3.65 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
|
Service Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Parents of Youth Patients, pre-intervention
|
3.12 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
|
Service Satisfaction Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Parents of Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up
|
3.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-interventionPopulation: 47 participants total completed the TOES measure. 23 youth participants and 24 caregiver participants completed the measure at pre-intervention.
The Treatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (TOES) is a 8-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers about their expectations from counseling. Items are rated on a 3-point scale with higher responses corresponding to more expectations (e.g., 1= "I do not expect this," 2= "I am not sure", and 3= "I do expect this"). The TOES will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=47 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Treatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
|
Treatment Outcomes Expectation Scale (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Parents of Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
2.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-interventionPopulation: TPEI items are interpreted at the item level and are not scored together; therefore, outcomes report the number of participants who completed the measure.
The Treatment Process Expectations Index is a 9-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers about their expectations about counseling. Items are rated on a 3-point scale (e.g., 1= "I do not expect this," 2= "I am not sure", and 3= "I do expect this"). There is no right or wrong answer. The reported scores should be interpreted at the item level to identify clinical suggestions for providers based on the clients reported expectations at baseline. The TPEI will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=125 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Treatment Process Expectations Index (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
23 Participants
|
|
Treatment Process Expectations Index (Client Satisfaction & Attitudinal Engagement)
Parents of Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
24 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Monthly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow upPopulation: 56 participants total completed the OHIO measure. 2 youth participants and 1 caregiver participant completed the measure at both the pre- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.
The Ohio Functioning Scale is a 20-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to answer questions regarding how the client's problems may get in the way of everyday activities. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to better ability to do everyday activities (e.g., 0= "Extreme troubles," 1= "Quite a few troubles," 2= "Some troubles", 3= "Ok," and 4= "Doing very well"). A total functioning score ranges from 20-100 and is calculated by summing the ratings for all 20 items. Higher scores are indicative of better functioning. The Ohio Functioning Scale will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention Ohio score (i.e., first instance of participant completing Ohio prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up Ohio score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=56 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Ohio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)
Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
37.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.63
|
|
Ohio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)
Youth Patients, 12-month follow-Up
|
59.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.57
|
|
Ohio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)
Parent of Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
33.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.87
|
|
Ohio Functioning Scale (Client Functioning)
Parent of Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up
|
62.33 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Monthly from pre-intervention to 12-month follow upPopulation: 67 participants total completed the SFSS measure. 2 youth participants and 3 caregiver participants completed the measure at both the pre- and 12-month follow-up timepoints.
The Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale which is a 13-item questionnaire that asks clients and their caregivers to reflect on behaviors, thoughts, and feelings that the client had in the last 2 weeks. Items are rated on a 5-point scale with higher responses corresponding to more frequent experiences of negative behaviors, thoughts, and feelings (e.g., 1= "Never," 2= "Hardly Ever," 3= "Sometimes," 4= "Often," and 5= "Very Often"). Scores can range from 33 to 86 for youths, where a high score represents high severity and a low score indicates low severity. Total scores are calculated by adding the rating and then divide the sum by the number of items to calculate the average score.The SFSS will be administered to clients aged 12-25 and caregivers. Outcomes report pre-intervention SFSS score (i.e., first instance of participant completing SFSS prior-to intervention) and 12-month follow-up SFSS score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Training Intervention
n=67 Participants
The single-arm intervention study will test an online asynchronous evidence-based training intervention called
The training is a modular online asynchronous training intervention designed to increase mental health providers' use of evidence-based practices with youth patients (ages 12-25). It was developed using community-engaged and human-centered design methods with key stakeholders (youth, their parents, mental health providers). In this open trial, the training will be offered to mental health providers at a multisite mental health clinic in the U.S. (referred to as "pilot site" herein).
|
|---|---|
|
Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)
Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
52.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.47
|
|
Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)
Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up
|
46 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.14
|
|
Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)
Parents of Youth Patients, Pre-intervention
|
44.58 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.89
|
|
Symptoms and Functionality Severity Scale (Client Symptomatology & Functioning)
Parents of Youth Patients, 12-month follow-up
|
38.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
Adverse Events
Providers
Youth Patient
Parents of Youth Patient
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Maggi Price, PI
Boston College School of Social Work
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place