Comparison of Flutter and PEP Mask on Chest Clearance, Dyspnea in Elderly Asthmatic Patients
NCT ID: NCT05618873
Last Updated: 2023-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-01
2023-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Effects of ACBT and Bubble Positive Expiratory Pressure Device in Asthmatic Patients
NCT06176742
Alternate Nostril Breathing With Incentive Spirometry on Lung Function Among Asthma Patients
NCT07110116
Comparative Effect of Box Breathing And Buteyko Breathing on Pulmonary Functions in Asthma
NCT07140458
Comparative Effects Of Buteyko Breathing Techniques And Papworth Method In Asthmatic Patients
NCT05931952
Outcomes for Medicare Asthma Patients Taking Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Xinafoate Combination Versus Inhaled Corticosteroids or Other Combination Therapy
NCT01347060
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
flutter device therapy
The flutter was used as follows. Sitting with a straight back and the elbows supported on the table, the patient held the flutter horizontally. The patient inhaled deeply, held their breath for 2 or 3 s and then took the mouthpiece into the mouth and exhaled quietly yet quickly enough to activate the flutter. The patient had to keep their cheeks as stiff as possible. This procedure was repeated 15 times, following which the patient huffed three times and evacuated sputum by a voluntary cough. This sequence was repeated five times. The patient obtained the maximal vibration sensation by tilting the flutter upwards or downwards by a few degrees.
Flutter device
The flutter was used as follows. Sitting with a straight back and the elbows supported on the table, the patient held the flutter horizontally. The patient inhaled deeply, held their breath for 2 or 3 s and then took the mouthpiece into the mouth and exhaled quietly yet quickly enough to activate the flutter. The patient had to keep their cheeks as stiff as possible. This procedure was repeated 15 times, following which the patient huffed three times and evacuated sputum by a voluntary cough. This sequence was repeated five times. The patient obtained the maximal vibration sensation by tilting the flutter upwards or downwards by a few degrees.
Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask
The PEP-mask was used as follows. Sitting with a straight back and the elbows supported on the table, the patient pressed the mask against the face with both hands. After a quiet inhalation, a slow active exhalation followed. The exhalation was restricted by a resistance selected to cause a positive expiratory pressure of 8-12 cmH2O. The patient exhaled 15 times through the mask.
Thereafter, the patient huffed three times and evacuated sputum by a voluntary cough. This sequence was repeated five times.
positive expiratory pressure mask
The PEP-mask was used as follows. Sitting with a straight back and the elbows supported on the table, the patient pressed the mask against the face with both hands. After a quiet inhalation, a slow active exhalation followed. The exhalation was restricted by a resistance selected to cause a positive expiratory pressure of 8-12 cmH2O. The patient exhaled 15 times through the mask.
Thereafter, the patient huffed three times and evacuated sputum by a voluntary cough. This sequence was repeated five times.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Flutter device
The flutter was used as follows. Sitting with a straight back and the elbows supported on the table, the patient held the flutter horizontally. The patient inhaled deeply, held their breath for 2 or 3 s and then took the mouthpiece into the mouth and exhaled quietly yet quickly enough to activate the flutter. The patient had to keep their cheeks as stiff as possible. This procedure was repeated 15 times, following which the patient huffed three times and evacuated sputum by a voluntary cough. This sequence was repeated five times. The patient obtained the maximal vibration sensation by tilting the flutter upwards or downwards by a few degrees.
positive expiratory pressure mask
The PEP-mask was used as follows. Sitting with a straight back and the elbows supported on the table, the patient pressed the mask against the face with both hands. After a quiet inhalation, a slow active exhalation followed. The exhalation was restricted by a resistance selected to cause a positive expiratory pressure of 8-12 cmH2O. The patient exhaled 15 times through the mask.
Thereafter, the patient huffed three times and evacuated sputum by a voluntary cough. This sequence was repeated five times.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both age above 40-60 years of age
* Both gender
* No previous surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurological problems
* Rib fracture
40 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Madiha younas, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
riphah internationl university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Allied hospital
Faisalābad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/ ALI HASSAN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.