PRO-MR-RT Systematic Patient-reported Outcomes to Pelvic Online MRgRT
NCT ID: NCT05615909
Last Updated: 2024-08-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
156 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-11-19
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The acute toxicity is important when evaluating treatment tolerability. A prospective longitudinal observation of the acute treatment toxicity to online MR-guided radiotherapy is therefore essential in the evaluation of this new technology.
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are disease symptoms and treatment toxicity reported directly by patients themselves without clinician interpretation. Several studies have indicated that clinicians tend to underreport the incidence and severity of patient symptoms, thus a systematic use of PROs in clinical trials can provide valuable evidence to the clinicians. As online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a new technology there is limited research worldwide on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life.
The objective of this study is therefore to prospectively investigate the patient-reported acute toxicity and changes in quality of life during and after online MR-guided radiotherapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MR-linac Guided Ultra-hypofractionated RT for Prostate Cancer (SMART-P01 and SMART-P02)
NCT05183074
Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to Guide Differential-Dose Prostate Brachytherapy
NCT01913197
MR-simulation in Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
NCT03238170
Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging With Hyperpolarized 13C-Pyruvate +/- 13C,15N-Urea in Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT06391034
Prostate Radiotherapy Integrated With Simultaneous MRI (The PRISM Study)
NCT03658525
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2018 the first patients worldwide were treated with the first 1.5 T MR-linac. The MR-linac is innovative technology in cancer treatment making precision radiotherapy possible, as it is a linear accelerator mounted on a ring around a 1.5-Tesla MRI Scanner combined with an online adaptive radiotherapy planning system. When the patient is positioned in the MR-linac it is possible to get real-time MR images with high soft tissue contrast, adapt the radiotherapy plan and subsequently irradiate at each treatment fraction. The improved visualization on the MR images makes it possible to see how the tumour and the organs around it changes and adapt the treatment plan every day. This opens up for a reduction of safety margins needed to insure target coverage and increased use of hypo- fractionation. Cancer patients will hopefully benefit from this with decreased treatment toxicity and increased local tumor control rates.
Today, computed tomography (CT)-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy is standard treatment for patients with pelvic or abdominal tumors. However, the visualization of the tumor and surrounding tissue is poor due to low soft-tissue contrast in the cone-beam scans. When using MRI for online radiotherapy planning in pelvic and abdominal sites, the soft-tissue contrast will be high making it possible to improve contouring accuracy and reduce margins. The potential of the MR-linac lowering treatment toxicity can greatly impact survivorship and quality of life. This would particularly be beneficial for patients diagnosed with cancer in the pelvic region, like prostate cancer, having considerably high chances of survival.
The standard for toxicity monitoring in cancer clinical trials is the prospective clinician reporting of the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). CTCAE grading, as well as patient-reported outcomes (PRO), is also part of the proposed standard assessment methodology for clinical evaluation of radiotherapy innovations like online MRgRT. Several studies have identified discrepancies between clinician and patient reporting within systemic treatment where clinicians appear to underreport the severity of treatment toxicity, compared to patient-reported severity. Therefore, patient self-reports are an important supplement to the evaluation of online MRgRT as in other oncological settings where they have been used as direct indicators of worsening, persistence or improvement of symptoms and general well-being. Furthermore, patient self-reports reduces the risk of unanticipated treatment toxicities being undetected.
Methods:
Study Design:
The study is a prospective single-arm longitudinal observational study including all prostate cancer patients treated with online MR-guided radiotherapy or CT-guided radiotherapy in the study period.
Participants:
Patients with prostate cancer referred for radiotherapy at Odense University Hospital in the time period 15.11.2020 - 01.07.2022 will be eligible for inclusion.
Data collection:
A patient pathway app, My Hospital, will be used for data collection. A PRO item set for patients with prostate cancer has been developed and tested in a pilot study (PRO-CTCAE and EORTC items). The item set will be used weekly during treatment and 4 weeks following to capture expected and unanticipated symptoms of acute treatment toxicity. During follow-up patients wll be asked to report 8, 12 and 24 weeks after radiotherapy completion. Other questionnaires will be used to measure quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30+EORTC PR25), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), patient experience with ePRO (Patient Feedback Form) and patient experience with treatment on a 1.5 T Unity MR-linac (Patient Experience Questionnaire).
Data on clinician management of PROs will be drafted from the patient app My Hospital.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Online MR-guided radiotherapy
Prostate cancer patients treated with online MR-guided radiotherapy in the Unity MR-linac.
Online MR-guided radiotherapy
Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy in the Unity MR-linac for localized intermediate risk prostate cancer (60 Gy/20 fx) or low-volume metastatic prostate cancer (36 Gy/6 fx).
CT-guided radiotherapy
Prostate cancer patients treated with CT-guided radiotherapy (VMAT) in linear accerelators.
CT-guided radiotherapy
CT-guided radiotherapy in linear accelerators for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (78 Gy/39 fx), intermediate risk prostata cancer (60 Gy/20 Fx) or having salvage radiotherapy (70 Gy/35 fx)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Online MR-guided radiotherapy
Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy in the Unity MR-linac for localized intermediate risk prostate cancer (60 Gy/20 fx) or low-volume metastatic prostate cancer (36 Gy/6 fx).
CT-guided radiotherapy
CT-guided radiotherapy in linear accelerators for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (78 Gy/39 fx), intermediate risk prostata cancer (60 Gy/20 Fx) or having salvage radiotherapy (70 Gy/35 fx)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* referred for primary radiotherapy or salvage radiotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable ro read, understand and complete patient-reported surveys in Danish (electronic or paper-based)
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novo Nordisk A/S
INDUSTRY
AgeCare Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research
UNKNOWN
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pia Krause Møller
BN, MPH, Phd Student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pia KK Møller, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Research Unit of Oncology, Odense University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Odense University Hospital
Odense, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Pilot study conducted before this prospective longitudinal study
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OP_775
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.