Personalise Antidepressant Treatment for Unipolar Depression Combining Individual Choices, Risks and Big Data

NCT ID: NCT05608330

Last Updated: 2022-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

504 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-30

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PETRUSHKA is aimed at developing and subsequently testing a personalised approach to the pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder in adults, which can be used in everyday NHS clinical settings.

We have collected data from patients with major depressive disorder, obtained from diverse datasets, including randomised trials as well as real-world registries (registers that hold routinely collected NHS data from the UK). These data summarise the most reliable and most up-to-date scientific evidence about benefits and adverse effects of antidepressants for depression and have been used to inform the PETRUSHKA prediction model to produce individualised treatment recommendations. The prediction model underpins a web-based decision support tool (the PETRUSHKA tool) which incorporates the patient's and clinician's preferences in order to rank treatment options and tailor the treatment to each patient.

This trial will recruit participants from the NHS within primary care in England and investigate whether the use of the PETRUSHKA tool is better than 'usual care' treatment in terms of adherence to antidepressant treatment, clinical response and quality of life, and its cost-effectiveness over a 6-months follow up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The PETRUSHKA tool, employs a bespoke algorithm to identify the best antidepressant for each individual patient. The algorithm: (a) is based on a prediction model which uses a combination of advanced analytics (statistics) and machine learning methods (artificial intelligence); (b) uses a dataset which is a combination of real-world data (QResearch: https://www.qresearch.org/) from over 1 million primary care patients with depression in England and Wales, and individual participant data from about 40,000 patients recruited in randomised controlled trials; (c) incorporates preferences from patients and clinicians (especially about adverse events); (d) generates a ranked list of personalised treatment recommendations that will inform the clinical discussion between clinicians and patients, and the final treatment decision. The clinical decision aid tool is implemented in the form of a web-based application, accessible from any computer or tablet.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Assessors will be blind when administering rating scales at week 8 and 24, and statisticians will be blind to the allocated treatment during analysis.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PETRUSHKA tool

The intervention is the PETRUSHKA web-based App (also called PETRUSHKA tool), a clinical decision-support system that incorporates a personalised evidence-based prediction model with individual patient preferences, to prescribe the best antidepressant to adults with depression

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PETRUSHKA tool

Intervention Type OTHER

In the experimental arm, the PETRUSHKA tool will automatically select the antidepressants that have the best profile in terms of efficacy and acceptability for each individual participant (based on their baseline demographic and clinical characteristics) and then ask the participant to provide their preferences about common (and non-serious) adverse events. Based on patient's preferences and their individual characteristics, the PETRUSHKA tool will then identify the three best antidepressants for the participant. The clinician and the participant will be presented with an overall recommendation (in the format of a pictogram) showing how strongly each antidepressant is recommended for that individual patient. Via a shared decision-making process, the participant and the clinician will then agree on which antidepressant to choose from the shortlist.

Usual Care

Routine care delivered in the NHS (i.e. selection of the antidepressant based primarily on the clinicians' judgement) termed 'usual care' in this study.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Any antidepressant prescribed by clinician based upon their clinical judgement.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PETRUSHKA tool

In the experimental arm, the PETRUSHKA tool will automatically select the antidepressants that have the best profile in terms of efficacy and acceptability for each individual participant (based on their baseline demographic and clinical characteristics) and then ask the participant to provide their preferences about common (and non-serious) adverse events. Based on patient's preferences and their individual characteristics, the PETRUSHKA tool will then identify the three best antidepressants for the participant. The clinician and the participant will be presented with an overall recommendation (in the format of a pictogram) showing how strongly each antidepressant is recommended for that individual patient. Via a shared decision-making process, the participant and the clinician will then agree on which antidepressant to choose from the shortlist.

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual Care

Any antidepressant prescribed by clinician based upon their clinical judgement.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 18 - 74 years inclusive;
* Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial;
* Clinical diagnosis of depression (either single episode or recurrent), for which an antidepressant is clinically indicated;
* Willing to start antidepressant treatment as monotherapy;
* Able to read/understand and/or complete self-administered questionnaires online in English;
* Willing to meet any clinical requirements related to taking a specific medication

Exclusion Criteria

* Prescribed any antidepressant in the preceding 4 weeks;
* Current or historical diagnosis of ADHD, Alcohol/Substance Use Disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia, eating disorders, mania/hypomania, OCD, PTSD, psychosis/schizophrenia, Treatment Resistant Depression (having tried 2 or more antidepressants for the same depressive episode at adequate dose and time);
* Diagnosis of arrhythmias (including Q-T prolongation, heart block), recent MI, poorly controlled epilepsy, acute porphyrias;
* Require urgent mental care or admission (including suicidal intent/plans);
* Concurrently enrolled in another investigational medicinal product (IMP) trial or an interventional trial about depression;
* Participants who are currently pregnant, planning pregnancy or lactating;
* Has a medical, social or other condition which, in the investigator's opinion , may make the participant unable to comply with all the trial requirements (e.g., terminal illness - motor neuron disease).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

74 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, Harrell FE Jr, Martin GP, Reitsma JB, Moons KGM, Collins G, van Smeden M. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32188600 (View on PubMed)

Tervonen T, Naci H, van Valkenhoef G, Ades AE, Angelis A, Hillege HL, Postmus D. Applying Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis to Comparative Benefit-Risk Assessment: Choosing among Statins in Primary Prevention. Med Decis Making. 2015 Oct;35(7):859-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15587005. Epub 2015 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25986470 (View on PubMed)

Christodoulou E, Ma J, Collins GS, Steyerberg EW, Verbakel JY, Van Calster B. A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30763612 (View on PubMed)

Austin PC, Harrell FE Jr, Steyerberg EW. Predictive performance of machine and statistical learning methods: Impact of data-generating processes on external validity in the "large N, small p" setting. Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1465-1483. doi: 10.1177/09622802211002867. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33848231 (View on PubMed)

Chekroud AM, Zotti RJ, Shehzad Z, Gueorguieva R, Johnson MK, Trivedi MH, Cannon TD, Krystal JH, Corlett PR. Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;3(3):243-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00471-X. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26803397 (View on PubMed)

Califf RM, Robb MA, Bindman AB, Briggs JP, Collins FS, Conway PH, Coster TS, Cunningham FE, De Lew N, DeSalvo KB, Dymek C, Dzau VJ, Fleurence RL, Frank RG, Gaziano JM, Kaufmann P, Lauer M, Marks PW, McGinnis JM, Richards C, Selby JV, Shulkin DJ, Shuren J, Slavitt AM, Smith SR, Washington BV, White PJ, Woodcock J, Woodson J, Sherman RE. Transforming Evidence Generation to Support Health and Health Care Decisions. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2395-2400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1610128. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27974039 (View on PubMed)

Chekroud AM, Krystal JH. Personalised pharmacotherapy: an interim solution for antidepressant treatment? BMJ. 2015 May 14;350:h2502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2502. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25976040 (View on PubMed)

Lewis G, Pelosi AJ, Araya R, Dunn G. Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardized assessment for use by lay interviewers. Psychol Med. 1992 May;22(2):465-86. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700030415.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1615114 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

286484

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Precision Care for Major Depressive Disorder
NCT06580041 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
Major Depressive Disorder In The Elderly
NCT00093288 COMPLETED PHASE3
Personalized Ultrasonic Brain Stimulation for Depression
NCT05301036 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
A Study in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
NCT03642964 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2