Improving Sexual Quality of Life - Randomized Trial of Two vs Five MRI Guided SABR Treatments for Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT05600400
Last Updated: 2025-09-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
144 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-03-01
2029-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
5 Fractions of Pelvic SABR With Intra Prostatic SABR Boost:
NCT04245670
Phase II Randomized Trial of 2 Versus 5 Fraction Prostate Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT06835725
Proton-Based Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
NCT03159676
Stereotactic MRI-Guided Radiation for Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT03588819
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT00547339
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several trials have explored HDR as monotherapy, from 6-fractions to a single-fraction approach. Sunnybrook recently published a randomized trial of HDR monotherapy demonstrating superior biochemical control of a two-fraction over single-fraction approach. These and other data have informed the design of a phase III randomized controlled trial comparing two-fraction HDR monotherapy to low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy in patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer (NCT02960087) coordinated by the Canadian Clinical Trails Group (PR19). The investigators have shown that 2 fraction SABR has equivalent efficacy and tolerability to 2 fraction HDR but SABR does not require general anesthesia, is less invasive and cheaper.
UHRT is also supported by phase III data, including a large non-inferiority randomized trial (HYPO-RT-PC) demonstrating similar biochemical control with a 7-fraction versus conventionally-fractionated regimen. The non-inferiority PACE-B trial comparing 5-fraction SABR to conventionally-fractionated or moderately hypofractionated RT has demonstrated similar acute toxicity with use of contemporary SABR planning techniques. Sunnybrook has also conducted several iterative clinical trials testing increasingly hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy. The investigators observed in parallel cohort studies that 5 fractions of UHRT and 2 fractions of UHRT with a patented immobilization device (GU-Lok) had equal effectiveness but better tolerability with the 2 fraction technique. As this was a post hoc analysis, this study aims to validate those findings.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1
Two weekly fractions of 13.5 Gy
Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation
2 Fraction
Arm 2
Five every other day fractions of 8 Gy
Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation
2 Fraction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation
2 Fraction
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Low or favorable intermediate risk disease. Patient must meet one of the following categories:
* Low risk - T1-T2b, grade group 1, AND PSA \< 10 ng/ml;
* Favorable risk
1. Only one of the following intermediate risk factors - cT2c, grade group 2, or PSA 10-20 ng/ml; or
2. Grade group 3 AND PSA \< 20, AND \<cT2c AND absolute percentage pattern 4/5 is \<10%
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior pelvic radiotherapy
3. Anticoagulation medication (if unsafe to discontinue for gold seed insertion)
4. Diagnosis of bleeding diathesis
5. Large prostate (\>90cm3) on imaging
6. Immunosuppressive medications
7. Inflammatory bowel disease
8. Presence of dual hip prostheses
9. Contraindications to having MRI
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prostate Cure Foundation
UNKNOWN
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Danny Vesprini
Radiation Oncologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Danny Vesprini, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
iSMART
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.