Brain-Oscillation-Synchronized Stimulation to Enhance Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke

NCT ID: NCT05600374

Last Updated: 2023-11-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-06

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We will investigate the therapeutic efficacy of EEG-synchronized noninvasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the early subacute phase after ischemic stroke to improve upper limb motor rehabilitation. We hypothesize that synchronization of rTMS with the phase of the ongoing sensorimotor oscillation indicating high corticospinal excitability leads to significantly stronger improvement of paretic upper limb motor function than the same rTMS protocol non-synchronized to the ongoing sensorimotor oscillation or sham stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High-frequency rTMS will be applied to the ipsilesional motor cortex in 400 bursts of 100 Hz triplets with a mean inter-burst interval of 3 s (20 min treatment duration, 1,200 pulses per day) for 5 consecutive workdays (6,000 pulses total) at a stimulus intensity of 80% of resting motor threshold, in one of three conditions/arms, followed by 40 min task-specific hand/arm-physiotherapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ischemic Stroke, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multicenter randomized controlled double-blind three-arm parallel-group exploratory clinical trial Medical Device Regulation (MDR) clinical trail
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The study is a multicenter randomized controlled double-blind three-arm parallel-group exploratory clinical trial. The subjects as well as the as the rater in the post- and the follow-up assessment will be blinded to the intervention condition the patient receives.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Personalized stimulation

Each 100 Hz triplet is triggered when a real-time analyzed EEG-defined state of high corticospinal excitability is detected (i.e., the negative peak of the ongoing sensorimotor \~10 Hz μ-oscillation).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bossdevice

Intervention Type DEVICE

The bossdevice is a real-time digital signal processor consisting of hardware and software algorithms. It is designed to read-in a real-time raw data stream from a bio-signal amplifier (electroencephalography, EEG), to continuously analyze this data and to detect patterns based on oscillations in different frequencies. When such a specific bio-signal pattern is detected, the device indicates this through a standard output port. This enables a connected device to know with millisecond accuracy when a specific biosignal pattern occurs.

Non-personalized stimulation

The identical rTMS protocol as in Arm 1, but 100 Hz triplets are not synchronized to the ongoing sensorimotor μ-oscillation.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Sham stimulation

The same protocol as in arm 1 synchronized to the EEG-defined high excitability state, but with ineffective rTMS, using the sham side of an active/placebo TMS coil designed for double-blind clinical trials. Conditions/arm 2 and 3 are control conditions. Arm 2 controls for the specific effect of Condition/arm 1 to synchronize stimulation to the ongoing μ-oscillation. Arm 3 tests if auditory or somatosensory inputs (which are identical in the real and sham stimulation conditions) synchronized with the ongoing μ-oscillation are relevant for the effects of Arm 1.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bossdevice

The bossdevice is a real-time digital signal processor consisting of hardware and software algorithms. It is designed to read-in a real-time raw data stream from a bio-signal amplifier (electroencephalography, EEG), to continuously analyze this data and to detect patterns based on oscillations in different frequencies. When such a specific bio-signal pattern is detected, the device indicates this through a standard output port. This enables a connected device to know with millisecond accuracy when a specific biosignal pattern occurs.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects meeting all of the following criteria will be considered for admission to the trial:

1. Age ≥ 18 years at the time of signing the informed consent.
2. Cerebral ischemia identified by brain imaging (cerebral MRI or CT) occurred 1-14 days ago.
3. Subject understands and voluntarily signs an informed consent document prior to any study related assessments/procedures.
4. Stroke has resulted in a new arm-/hand motor deficit with ≤ 50 points in the FMA-UE.
5. Presence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the paretic hand. MEPs has to be obtained in the resting muscle

o If no MEPs can be obtained, MEP search procedure can be repeated later up to 14 days after stroke onset.
6. ● μ-oscillation (8-12 Hz) is recordable by EEG in the ipsilesional sensorimotor cortex with a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio of at least 3 dB
7. ● Subject is able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects presenting with any of the following criteria will not be included in the trial:

1. Hemorrhagic stroke (this refers to primary intracerebral hemorrhage only; hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic infarcts is not an exclusion criterion)
2. Estimated life expectancy \< 12 months
3. Presence of intracranial ferromagnetic metal (extracranial stents ≥10 cm away from the TMS coil are acceptable) in accordance with current safety guidelines \[18\]
4. Intraocular metal, cochlear implants
5. If TMS might interact with sensors of active implants (e.g., intra-cardiac defibrillators).
6. If a cranial bone gap affects currents induced by TMS (such as after craniotomy).
7. History of seizures or epilepsy.
8. Treatment intervention can't be started within 14 days after onset of stroke.
9. Women during pregnancy and lactation.
10. Participation in other studies if they are MDR or AMG studies or there is otherwise a high risk of insurance law issues intervening between two studies. In case of uncertainty, competing insurances must be contacted prior to participation
11. persistent addiction disorder (except for nicotine dependence)
12. CNS malignoma
13. If there is any concern by the investigator regarding the safe participation of the subject in the study or for any other reason the investigator considers the subject inappropriate for participation in the study.
14. The ability to consent for patients who are unable to speak will be assessed on the basis of the NIHS-Score by an independent physician (details see chapter 21 and appendix).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Tuebingen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uniklinik Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Zentrum der Neurologie und Neurochirurgie

Frankfurt a.M., , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie

Greifswald, , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Allgemeine Neurologie

Münster, , Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Klinik für Neurologie

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ulf Ziemann, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

+49 7071 29 ext. 82049

Sven Poli, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Gereon R. Fink, Prof.Dr.

Role: primary

Christian Grefkes-Hermann, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

Agnea Flöel, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

Joseph Claßen, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

Sergiu Groppa, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

Sonja Suntrup-Krueger, PD Dr.

Role: primary

Ulf Ziemann, Prof. Dr

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lieb A, Zrenner B, Zrenner C, Kozak G, Martus P, Grefkes C, Ziemann U. Brain-oscillation-synchronized stimulation to enhance motor recovery in early subacute stroke: a randomized controlled double-blind three- arm parallel-group exploratory trial comparing personalized, non- personalized and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Acronym: BOSS-STROKE). BMC Neurol. 2023 May 25;23(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12883-023-03235-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37231390 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CIV-22-01-038788

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

01KG2125

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BOSS-STROKE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id