Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Knee Arthritis
NCT ID: NCT05596591
Last Updated: 2025-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-13
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Radial Versus Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT03921749
Extracorporeal Focused Shock Wave Therapy for Primary Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT02904785
Treatment of Post Traumatic Knee Osteoarthritis With Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
NCT06686680
Shock Wave Treatment in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT07125430
Shock Waves in Knee Arthritis
NCT06833372
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: This is an exploratory pilot study to determine the efficacy and safety of f-ESWT for the treatment of BMLs in people with knee OA.
Participants: Fifteen subjects with knee OA who have history of knee pain at rest and during walking with the confirmed diagnosis of subchondral BML(s) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) despite at least 4 weeks of conservative treatment will be enrolled into this study.
Procedures: Subjects will receive a total of 4 focused ESWT sessions (at high energy level) over 4 consecutive weeks.
Outcome Measures: Participants will be evaluated for adverse events and changes in pain intensity and knee function, using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0-10, with anchors "no pain" and "pain as bad as you can imagine") and; the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS; five subscales: pain, other symptoms, function in activities of daily living, function in sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life), respectively. Subjects will be assessed with these outcome measures at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months after the treatment. MRI of the involved knee will be performed prior to treatment (baseline) and 3 months and 6 months after treatment.
Anticipated Outcomes: Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy is a safe alternative to treating BMLs and will significantly decrease knee pain intensity and improve function in people with knee OA- related BMLs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Participants will receive four sessions over four consecutive weeks (one per week) of focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy.
Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy
High energy level shockwaves (between 0.28-0.60 mJ/mm\^2) will be focused over the subchondral bone with the bone marrow lesion, previously localized on MRI.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy
High energy level shockwaves (between 0.28-0.60 mJ/mm\^2) will be focused over the subchondral bone with the bone marrow lesion, previously localized on MRI.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score grade 2-4 as diagnosed on X-Ray.
3. Presence of BML(s) on MRI in a weight-bearing region of the knee (medial/lateral femoral condyle or tibial plateau).
4. Knee pain for more than 2 months.
5. Knee pain intensity during the week leading up to the screening visit is at least 4 out of 10 on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS; 0, no pain; 10, maximum pain imaginable).
6. Patient pain confined to the same compartment as the BML(s).
7. Subjects would have failed a minimum of 4 weeks of conservative treatment including rest, analgesics, limited weight-bearing with or without an assistive device.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Primary cause of patient pain and loss of function is due to pathology other than BML(s), according to patient history and clinical evaluation.
3. Presence of bilateral BML(s).
4. Systemic autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.
5. Participants receiving glucocorticoids due to any other underlying disease.
6. Prior treatment for BMLs including:
1. Subchondroplasty in the involved knee.
2. Intraosseous and/or intra-articular injection of orthobiologics in the past 6 months, such as platelet rich plasma (PRP), bone marrow aspirate concentrates, micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) or stromal vascular fraction.
7. Prior use of bisphosphonates, except according to the washout schedule:
1. 2 years (if use \> 48 weeks).
2. 1 year (if used \> 8 weeks but \< 48 weeks)
3. 6 months (if used \> 2 weeks but \< 8 weeks)
4. 2 months (if used \< 2 weeks)
5. Any intravenous bisphosphonate within the prior 2 years.
8. Intra-articular steroid injection in the prior 3 months.
9. Previous knee surgery in the past 6 months.
10. Tumors
11. Infection or fracture on ipsilateral lower limb.
12. Pregnancy.
13. Contraindications to f-ESWT, such as severe coagulopathy, malignant tumor in the treatment area.
14. Contraindications to MRI scanning including:
* Presence of metal implants such as implanted pacemaker, metal sutures, metallic protheses (including metal pins and rods, heart valves), presence of shrapnel or iron filings in the eye, magnetic dental implants, cochlear implants, cerebral aneurysm clip, and deep brain stimulator.
* Claustrophobia.
* The patient has been informed by his/her doctor that it is medically unsafe to receive regular MRI as part of his/her medical care.
30 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
New Jersey Regenerative Institute, LLC
INDUSTRY
Kessler Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nathan Hogaboom, PhD
Research Scientist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
New Jersey Regenerative Institute
Cedar Knolls, New Jersey, United States
Nathan Hogaboom
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Jay Bowen, DO
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
R-1191-22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.